Screening colonoscopy similarly prevented distal and proximal colorectal cancer: a prospective study among 55-69-year-olds

被引:6
|
作者
Braitmaier, Malte [1 ]
Schwarz, Sarina [2 ]
Kollhorst, Bianca [1 ]
Senore, Carlo [3 ]
Didelez, Vanessa [1 ,4 ]
Haug, Ulrike [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Biometry & Data Management, Bremen, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Citta Salute & Sci, Epidemiol & Screening Unit CPO, Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Bremen, Fac Math & Comp Sci, Bremen, Germany
[5] Univ Bremen, Fac Human & Hlth Sci, Bremen, Germany
[6] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Achterstr 30, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
关键词
Screening colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Observational study; Effectiveness; Target trial emulation; Proximal; SERRATED POLYPS; RISK; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.024
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing incidence of distal vs. proximal colorectal cancer (CRC) in persons aged 55-69 years. Study Design and Setting: Using observational data from a German claims database (German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database), we emulated a target trial with two arms: Colonoscopy screening vs. no-screening at baseline. Adjusted cumulative incidence of total, distal, and proximal CRC over 11 years of follow-up was estimated in 55 -69-year-olds at an average CRC risk and without co-lonoscopy, polypectomy, or fecal occult blood test before baseline. Results: Overall, 307,158 persons were included (screening arm: 198,389 and control arm: 117,399). The adjusted 11-year risk of any CRC was 1.62% in the screening group and 2.38% in the no-screening group resulting in a relative risk of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63-0.73). The relative risk was 0.67 for distal CRC (95% CI: 0.62-0.73) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.79) for proximal CRC. The cumulative incidence curves of the groups crossed after 6.7 (distal CRC) and 5.0 years (proximal CRC). Conclusion: Our results suggest that colonoscopy is effective in preventing distal and proximal CRC. Unlike previous studies not using a target trial approach, we found no relevant difference in the effectiveness by location.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 126
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COLORECTAL CANCER AND ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE SCREENING STUDY COMPARING FAECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTING (FIT) FOR OCCULT BLOOD WITH COLONOSCOPY
    Collins, M.
    Bampton, P.
    Chan, C.
    Cole, S.
    Young, G.
    Russ, G.
    McDonald, S.
    Coates, T.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 15 : 28 - 28
  • [32] Regret on Choice of Colorectal Cancer Screening Modality Was Associated with Poorer Screening Compliance: A 4-Year Prospective Cohort Study
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Ching, Jessica Y. L.
    Chan, Victor C. W.
    Bruggemann, Renee
    Lam, Thomas Y. T.
    Luk, Arthur K. C.
    Wu, Justin C. Y.
    Chan, Francis K. L.
    Sung, Joseph J. Y.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [33] 5-year surveillance of patients with adenomas or colorectal cancer at screening colonoscopy: Results from the VA cooperative study # 380
    Lieberman, DA
    Weiss, D
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A22 - A22
  • [34] Temporal decline of social support among colorectal cancer survivors: 1-year prospective study
    Chen, Hong
    Tian, Jinglun
    Cai, Lin
    Zeng, Benqiang
    Zheng, Shaojun
    Tian, Xiaobing
    Zeng, Enquan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (09): : 18479 - 18485
  • [35] Three-year follow up on a colorectal cancer screening program in Hong Kong: a prospective cohort study
    Lam, T. Y. T.
    Sung, J. J. Y.
    Tsoi, K. K. F.
    Ng, S. C.
    Wu, J. C. Y.
    Ching, J. Y. L.
    Chan, F. K. L.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 6 - 7
  • [36] Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP)
    Gondal, G
    Grotmol, T
    Hofstad, B
    Bretthauer, M
    Eide, TJ
    Hoff, G
    GUT, 2003, 52 (03) : 398 - 403
  • [37] The role of high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening: A prospective "back-to-back" endoscopic study
    Hurlstone, DP
    Karajeh, M
    Cross, SS
    McAlindon, ME
    Brown, S
    Hunter, MD
    Sanders, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (10): : 2167 - 2173
  • [38] Colorectal cancer surveillance by colonoscopy in a prospective, population-based long-term Swiss screening study - outcomes, adherence, and costs
    Zgraggen, Armin
    Stoffel, Sandro Tiziano
    Barbier, Michaela Carla
    Marbet, Urs Albert
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2022, 60 (05): : 761 - 778
  • [39] High prevalence of colorectal adenomas among asymptomatic HIV-infected patients 50 years of age and older: A prospective screening colonoscopy study
    Bini, EJ
    Green, B
    Poles, MA
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB247 - AB247
  • [40] 13-Year colorectal cancer risk after lower-quality, higher-quality and no screening colonoscopy: a cohort study
    Schwarz, Sarina
    Braitmaier, Malte
    Pox, Christian
    Kollhorst, Bianca
    Didelez, Vanessa
    Haug, Ulrike
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 176