Screening colonoscopy similarly prevented distal and proximal colorectal cancer: a prospective study among 55-69-year-olds

被引:6
|
作者
Braitmaier, Malte [1 ]
Schwarz, Sarina [2 ]
Kollhorst, Bianca [1 ]
Senore, Carlo [3 ]
Didelez, Vanessa [1 ,4 ]
Haug, Ulrike [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Biometry & Data Management, Bremen, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Citta Salute & Sci, Epidemiol & Screening Unit CPO, Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Bremen, Fac Math & Comp Sci, Bremen, Germany
[5] Univ Bremen, Fac Human & Hlth Sci, Bremen, Germany
[6] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Achterstr 30, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
关键词
Screening colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Observational study; Effectiveness; Target trial emulation; Proximal; SERRATED POLYPS; RISK; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.024
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing incidence of distal vs. proximal colorectal cancer (CRC) in persons aged 55-69 years. Study Design and Setting: Using observational data from a German claims database (German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database), we emulated a target trial with two arms: Colonoscopy screening vs. no-screening at baseline. Adjusted cumulative incidence of total, distal, and proximal CRC over 11 years of follow-up was estimated in 55 -69-year-olds at an average CRC risk and without co-lonoscopy, polypectomy, or fecal occult blood test before baseline. Results: Overall, 307,158 persons were included (screening arm: 198,389 and control arm: 117,399). The adjusted 11-year risk of any CRC was 1.62% in the screening group and 2.38% in the no-screening group resulting in a relative risk of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63-0.73). The relative risk was 0.67 for distal CRC (95% CI: 0.62-0.73) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.79) for proximal CRC. The cumulative incidence curves of the groups crossed after 6.7 (distal CRC) and 5.0 years (proximal CRC). Conclusion: Our results suggest that colonoscopy is effective in preventing distal and proximal CRC. Unlike previous studies not using a target trial approach, we found no relevant difference in the effectiveness by location.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 126
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uptake and detection rate of colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy in China: A population-based, prospective cohort study
    Yu, Zhikai
    Li, Bibo
    Zhao, Shenglin
    Du, Jia
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Xiu
    Guo, Qing
    Zhou, Hong
    He, Mei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2024, 153
  • [22] Strong Reduction of Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy: Prospective Cohort Study From Germany
    Guo, Feng
    Chen, Chen
    Holleczek, Bernd
    Schoettker, Ben
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Brenner, Hermann
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 (05): : 967 - 975
  • [23] Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Serum Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Results from a Two-Year Prospective Colonoscopy Trial
    Ritchie, Shawn
    Tonita, Jon
    Alvi, Riaz
    McHattie, James
    Lehotay, Denis C.
    Elshoni, Hoda
    St George, Catherine
    Su-Myat, Khine
    Goodenowe, Dayan
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S135 - S136
  • [24] Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention, one year results from a prospective health care service research in Bavaria (Germany)
    Birkner, BR
    Kleff, S
    Thomas, J
    Fritsche, R
    Munte, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A348 - A348
  • [25] Screening colonoscopy among persons 50 to 60 years of age with and without familial risk of colorectal cancer - a prospective multicenter trial
    Sieg, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2003, 41 (11): : 1077 - 1082
  • [26] Symptoms and signs of colorectal cancer, with differences between proximal and distal colon cancer: a prospective cohort study of diagnostic accuracy in primary care
    Knut Holtedahl
    Lars Borgquist
    Gé A. Donker
    Frank Buntinx
    David Weller
    Christine Campbell
    Jörgen Månsson
    Victoria Hammersley
    Tonje Braaten
    Ranjan Parajuli
    BMC Family Practice, 22
  • [27] Symptoms and signs of colorectal cancer, with differences between proximal and distal colon cancer: a prospective cohort study of diagnostic accuracy in primary care
    Holtedahl, Knut
    Borgquist, Lars
    Donker, Ge A.
    Buntinx, Frank
    Weller, David
    Campbell, Christine
    Mansson, Jorgen
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Braaten, Tonje
    Parajuli, Ranjan
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [28] Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening:: A prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin colonoscopy project 1, BECOP 1)
    Adler, Andreas
    Roll, Stephanie
    Marowski, Bernhard
    Drossel, Rolf
    Rehs, Hans-Ulrich
    Willich, Stefan N.
    Riese, Jutta
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    Roesch, Thomas
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (10) : 1628 - 1638
  • [29] The Temporal Decline of Social Support among Colorectal Cancer Survivors: First Year Prospective Study
    Chen Hong
    Tian Jing-Lun
    Lin, Cai
    Zeng Ben-Qiang
    Zheng Shaojun
    Tian Xiao-Bing
    Zeng En-Quan
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 45 (10) : 1367 - 1368
  • [30] Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Faecal Immunochemical Testing Versus Colonoscopy
    Collins, Michael G.
    Teo, Edward
    Chan, Choy
    Young, Graeme P.
    Cole, Stephen R.
    McDonald, Stephen P.
    Russ, Graeme R.
    Bampton, Peter A.
    Coates, Patrick T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 : 472 - 472