Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment

被引:27
|
作者
Jones, D
Domotor, S
Higley, K
Kocher, D
Bilyard, G
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] US DOE, Off Environm Policy & Guidance, Washington, DC USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Nucl Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Life Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[5] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA USA
关键词
ecological risk assessment; ERA; graded approach; biota; dose assessment; radionuclides;
D O I
10.1016/S0265-931X(02)00114-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a bridge between the fields of ecological risk assessment (ERA) and radioecology by presenting key biota dose assessment issues identified in the US Department of Energy's Graded Approach for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota in a manner consistent with the US Environmental Protection Agency's framework for ERA. Current radiological ERA methods and data are intended for use in protecting natural populations of biota, rather than individual members of a population. Potentially susceptible receptors include vertebrates and terrestrial plants. One must ensure that all media, radionuclides (including short-lived radioactive decay products), types of radiations (i.e., alpha particles, electrons, and photons), and pathways (i.e., internal and external contamination) are combined in each exposure scenario. The relative biological effectiveness of alpha particles with respect to deterministic effects must also be considered. Expected safe levels of exposure are available for the protection of natural populations of aquatic biota (10 mGy d(-1)) and terrestrial plants (10 mGy d(-1)) and animals (1 mGy d(-1)) and are appropriate for use in all radiological ERA tiers, provided that appropriate exposure assumptions are used. Caution must be exercised (and a thorough justification provided) if more restrictive limits are selected, to ensure that the supporting data are of high quality, reproducible, and clearly relevant to the protection of natural populations. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the NESHAP radiological risk assessment
    Wahl, LE
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1996, 71 (03): : 279 - 283
  • [32] RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC RISK
    SEARLE, AG
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1977, 14 (05) : 307 - 308
  • [33] Radiological Risk Assessment and Environmental Analysis
    Wawzyniecki, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2009, 16 (02): : 40 - 40
  • [34] Radiological Risk Assessment of Environmental Radon
    Khalid, Norafatin
    Ab Majid, Amran
    Yahaya, Redzuwan
    Yasir, Muhammad Samudi
    2013 UKM FST POSTGRADUATE COLLOQUIUM, 2013, 1571 : 169 - 176
  • [35] Radiological Risk Assessment and Environmental Analysis
    Wawzyniecki, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2009, 16 (01): : 49 - 49
  • [36] Key issues on watershed ecological security assessment
    GAO JiXI~1 ZHANG XiangHui~(2*) JIANG Yun~1 OU XiaoKun~3 HE DaMing~4 SHI JianBin~5 1 Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
    2 Civil and Environmental Engineering School
    3 School of Resource Environment & Earth Science
    4 Asian International River Center
    5 EU-China Biodiversity Programme
    Science Bulletin, 2007, (S2) : 251 - 261
  • [37] Evaluation of Pressing Issues in Ecological Momentary Assessment
    Stone, Arthur A.
    Schneider, Stefan
    Smyth, Joshua M.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 19 : 107 - 131
  • [38] Key issues on watershed ecological security assessment
    Gao Jixi
    Zhang XiangHui
    Jiang Yun
    Ou XiaoKun
    He DaMing
    Shi JianBin
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2007, 52 : 251 - 261
  • [39] PFAS Experts Symposium 2: PFAS Toxicology and Risk Assessment in 2021 and risk assessment in 2021-Contemporary issues in human and ecological risk assessment of PFAS COMMENT
    Zodrow, Jean
    Vedagiri, Usha
    Sorell, Tamara
    McIntosh, Lisa
    Larson, Emily
    Hall, Linda
    Dourson, Michael
    Dell, Linda
    Cox, Douglas
    Barfoot, Krista
    Anderson, Janet
    REMEDIATION-THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP COSTS TECHNOLOGIES & TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (1-2): : 29 - 44
  • [40] Ecological risk assessment of pesticides
    Solomon, KR
    Giesy, JP
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2001, 7 (03): : 493 - 495