Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment

被引:27
|
作者
Jones, D
Domotor, S
Higley, K
Kocher, D
Bilyard, G
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] US DOE, Off Environm Policy & Guidance, Washington, DC USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Nucl Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Life Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[5] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA USA
关键词
ecological risk assessment; ERA; graded approach; biota; dose assessment; radionuclides;
D O I
10.1016/S0265-931X(02)00114-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a bridge between the fields of ecological risk assessment (ERA) and radioecology by presenting key biota dose assessment issues identified in the US Department of Energy's Graded Approach for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota in a manner consistent with the US Environmental Protection Agency's framework for ERA. Current radiological ERA methods and data are intended for use in protecting natural populations of biota, rather than individual members of a population. Potentially susceptible receptors include vertebrates and terrestrial plants. One must ensure that all media, radionuclides (including short-lived radioactive decay products), types of radiations (i.e., alpha particles, electrons, and photons), and pathways (i.e., internal and external contamination) are combined in each exposure scenario. The relative biological effectiveness of alpha particles with respect to deterministic effects must also be considered. Expected safe levels of exposure are available for the protection of natural populations of aquatic biota (10 mGy d(-1)) and terrestrial plants (10 mGy d(-1)) and animals (1 mGy d(-1)) and are appropriate for use in all radiological ERA tiers, provided that appropriate exposure assumptions are used. Caution must be exercised (and a thorough justification provided) if more restrictive limits are selected, to ensure that the supporting data are of high quality, reproducible, and clearly relevant to the protection of natural populations. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ecological Risk Assessment Issues Identified During the US Environmental Protection Agency's Examination of Risk Assessment Practices
    Dearfield, Kerry L.
    Bender, Edward S.
    Kravitz, Michael
    Wentsel, Randy
    Slimak, Michael W.
    Farland, William H.
    Gilman, Paul
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (01) : 73 - 76
  • [22] An assessment of the risk assessment paradigm for ecological risk assessment
    Menzie, CA
    Freshman, JS
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1997, 3 (05): : 853 - 892
  • [23] Ecological models and ecological risk assessment
    Campbell, KR
    Bartell, SM
    RISK ASSESSMENT: LOGIC AND MEASUREMENT, 1998, : 69 - 100
  • [24] ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    LACKEY, RT
    FISHERIES, 1994, 19 (09) : 14 - 19
  • [25] Ecological Risk Assessment
    Shea, Damian
    Thorsen, Waverly
    TOXICOLOGY AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS, 2012, 112 : 323 - 348
  • [26] Ecological risk assessment
    Cura, JJ
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1998, 70 (04) : 968 - 971
  • [27] Ecological risk assessment
    Andreasen, JK
    Norton, SB
    RISK-BASED DECISION MAKING IN WATER RESOURCES VIII, 1998, : 143 - 151
  • [28] Issues of uncertainty in ecological risk assessments
    WarrenHicks, WJ
    Butcher, JB
    ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS, 1997, : 199 - 210
  • [29] Principles of risk assessment
    Purchase, IFH
    Randall, GLP
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1998, 70 (09) : 1671 - 1683
  • [30] Principles of risk assessment
    Richardson, M.L.
    Kemija u industriji/Journal of Chemists and Chemical Engineers, 1994, 43 (03): : 164 - 166