Benchmark parameters for CMB polarization experiments

被引:145
|
作者
Hu, W [1 ]
Hedman, MM
Zaldarriaga, M
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Ctr Cosmol Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Ctr Astron & Astrophys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Enrico Fermi Inst, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] NYU, Dept Phys, New York, NY 10003 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2003年 / 67卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.67.043004
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The recently detected polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) holds the potential for revealing the physics of inflation and gravitationally mapping the large-scale structure of the universe, if so called B-mode signals below 10(-7), or tenths of a muK, can be reliably detected. We provide a language for describing systematic effects which distort the observed CMB temperature and polarization fields and so contaminate the B modes. We identify 7 types of effects, described by 11 distortion fields, and show their association with known instrumental systematics such as common mode and differential gain fluctuations, line cross-coupling, pointing errors, and differential polarized beam effects. Because of aliasing from the small-scale structure in the CMB, even uncorrelated fluctuations in these effects can affect the large-scale B modes relevant to gravitational waves. Many of these problems are greatly reduced by having an instrumental beam that resolves the primary anisotropies (full width at half maximum <10(')). To reach the ultimate goal of an inflationary energy scale of 3x10(15) GeV, polarization distortion fluctuations must be controlled at the 10(-2)-10(-3) level and temperature leakage to the 10(-4)-10(-3) level depending on the effect. For example, pointing errors must be controlled to 1.5(') rms for arcminute scale beams or a percent of the Gaussian beam width for larger beams; low spatial frequency differential gain fluctuations or line cross-coupling must be eliminated at the level of 10(-4) rms.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Early Universe with CMB polarization
    Souradeep, Tarun
    BULLETIN OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2011, 39 (01): : 163 - 180
  • [42] CMB polarization with BOOMERANG 2003
    Piacentini, F.
    Ade, P. A. R.
    Bock, J. J.
    Bond, J. R.
    Borrill, J.
    Boscaleri, A.
    Cabella, P.
    Contaldi, C. R.
    Crill, B. P.
    de Bernardis, P.
    De Gasperis, G.
    de Oliveira-Costa, A.
    De Troia, G.
    Di Stefano, G.
    Hivon, E.
    Jaffe, A. H.
    Kisner, T. S.
    Jones, W. C.
    Lange, A. E.
    Marini-Bettolo, C.
    Masi, S.
    Mauskopf, P. D.
    MacTavish, C. J.
    Melchiorri, A.
    Montroy, T. E.
    Nati, F.
    Nati, L.
    Natoli, P.
    Netterfield, C. B.
    Pascale, E.
    Pogosyan, D.
    Polenta, G.
    Prunet, S.
    Ricciardi, S.
    Romeo, G.
    Ruhl, J. E.
    Santini, P.
    Tegmark, M.
    Veneziam, M.
    Vittorio, N.
    NEW ASTRONOMY REVIEWS, 2007, 51 (3-4) : 244 - 249
  • [43] Nonlinear electrodynamics and CMB polarization
    Mosquera Cuesta, Herman J.
    Lambiase, G.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2011, (03):
  • [44] Likelihood Methods for CMB Experiments
    Gerbino, Martina
    Lattanzi, Massimiliano
    Migliaccio, Marina
    Pagano, Luca
    Salvati, Laura
    Colombo, Loris
    Gruppuso, Alessandro
    Natoli, Paolo
    Polenta, Gianluca
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2020, 8 (08):
  • [45] CMB POLARIZATION: THE NEXT DECADE
    Winstein, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2007, 16 (12B): : 2563 - 2571
  • [46] Nonlinear Electrodynamics and CMB Polarization
    Cuesta, Herman J. Mosquera
    Lambiase, Gaetano
    NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, VOLS I-III, 2010, 1281 : 864 - +
  • [47] Measuring CMB polarization with BOOMERANG
    Montroy, T
    Ade, PAR
    Balbi, A
    Bock, JJ
    Bond, JR
    Borrill, J
    Boscaleri, A
    Cabella, P
    Contaldi, CR
    Crill, BP
    de Bernardis, P
    De Gasperis, G
    de Oliveira-Costa, A
    De Troia, G
    di Stefano, G
    Ganga, K
    Hivon, E
    Hristov, VV
    Iacoangeli, A
    Jaffe, AH
    Kisner, TS
    Jones, WC
    Lange, AE
    Masi, S
    Mauskopf, PD
    MacTavish, C
    Melchiorri, A
    Nati, F
    Natoli, P
    Netterfield, CB
    Pascale, E
    Piacentini, F
    Pogosyan, D
    Polenta, G
    Prunet, S
    Ricciardi, S
    Romeo, G
    Ruhl, JE
    Torbet, E
    Tegmark, M
    Vittorio, N
    NEW ASTRONOMY REVIEWS, 2003, 47 (11-12) : 1057 - 1065
  • [48] Bianchi model CMB polarization and its implications for CMB anomalies
    Pontzen, Andrew
    Challinor, Anthony
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 380 (04) : 1387 - 1398
  • [49] Obstructions to Bell CMB experiments
    Martin, Jerome
    Vennin, Vincent
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2017, 96 (06)
  • [50] Readout system with on-board demodulation for CMB polarization experiments using coherent polarimeter array
    Ishidoshiro, Koji
    Nagai, Makoto
    Higuchi, Takeo
    Hasegawa, Masaya
    Hazumi, Masashi
    Ikeno, Masahiro
    Tajima, Osamu
    Tanaka, Manobu
    Uchida, Tomohisa
    2011 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2011, : 1244 - 1251