Benchmark parameters for CMB polarization experiments

被引:145
|
作者
Hu, W [1 ]
Hedman, MM
Zaldarriaga, M
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Ctr Cosmol Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Ctr Astron & Astrophys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Enrico Fermi Inst, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] NYU, Dept Phys, New York, NY 10003 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2003年 / 67卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.67.043004
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The recently detected polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) holds the potential for revealing the physics of inflation and gravitationally mapping the large-scale structure of the universe, if so called B-mode signals below 10(-7), or tenths of a muK, can be reliably detected. We provide a language for describing systematic effects which distort the observed CMB temperature and polarization fields and so contaminate the B modes. We identify 7 types of effects, described by 11 distortion fields, and show their association with known instrumental systematics such as common mode and differential gain fluctuations, line cross-coupling, pointing errors, and differential polarized beam effects. Because of aliasing from the small-scale structure in the CMB, even uncorrelated fluctuations in these effects can affect the large-scale B modes relevant to gravitational waves. Many of these problems are greatly reduced by having an instrumental beam that resolves the primary anisotropies (full width at half maximum <10(')). To reach the ultimate goal of an inflationary energy scale of 3x10(15) GeV, polarization distortion fluctuations must be controlled at the 10(-2)-10(-3) level and temperature leakage to the 10(-4)-10(-3) level depending on the effect. For example, pointing errors must be controlled to 1.5(') rms for arcminute scale beams or a percent of the Gaussian beam width for larger beams; low spatial frequency differential gain fluctuations or line cross-coupling must be eliminated at the level of 10(-4) rms.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Berkeley CMB experiments
    Richards, P. L.
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2007, 22 (25-28) : 1893 - 1900
  • [22] CMB polarization theory
    Hu, Wayne
    GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND COSMOLOGY, 2020, 200 : 217 - 237
  • [23] Future CMB experiments
    Halpern, M
    Scott, D
    MICROWAVE FOREGROUNDS, 1999, 181 : 283 - 298
  • [24] CMB anisotropy experiments
    Parijskij, YN
    Chepurnov, AV
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 1995, 74 (3-4) : 269 - 276
  • [25] Demonstration of anti-reflective structures over a large area for CMB polarization experiments
    Takaku, Ryota
    Hanany, Shaul
    Hoshino, Yurika
    Imada, Hiroaki
    Ishino, Hirokazu
    Katayama, Nobuhiko
    Komatsu, Kunimoto
    Konishi, Kuniaki
    Gonokami, Makoto Kuwata
    Matsumura, Tomotake
    Mitsuda, Kazuhisa
    Sakurai, Haruyuki
    Sakurai, Yuki
    Wen, Qi
    Yamasaki, Noriko
    Young, Karl
    Yumoto, Junji
    MILLIMETER, SUBMILLIMETER, AND FAR-INFRARED DETECTORS AND INSTRUMENTATION FOR ASTRONOMY X, 2020, 11453
  • [26] Discovery of CMB, sakharov oscillations and polarization of the CMB Anisotropy
    Novikov, D
    HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN COSMOLOGY, 2002, 252 : 43 - 53
  • [27] Amplifier arrays for CMB polarization
    Gaier, T
    Lawrence, CR
    Seiffert, MD
    Wells, MM
    Kangaslahti, P
    Dawson, D
    NEW ASTRONOMY REVIEWS, 2003, 47 (11-12) : 1167 - 1171
  • [28] Calibrating CMB polarization telescopes
    Staggs, ST
    Barkats, D
    Gundersen, JO
    Hedman, MM
    Herzog, CP
    McMahon, JJ
    Winstein, B
    ASTROPHYSICAL POLARIZED BACKGROUNDS, 2002, 609 : 183 - 186
  • [29] CMB polarization constraints on inflation
    Kinney, WH
    COSMO-98: SECOND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PARTICLE PHYSICS AND THE EARLY UNIVERSE, 1999, 478 : 168 - 171
  • [30] Magnetized birefringence and CMB polarization
    Giovannini, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2005, 71 (02): : 021301 - 1