Femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques - Is there an acutle angle effect?

被引:9
|
作者
Niedzwietzki, Patricia [1 ]
Zantop, Thore [1 ]
Weimann, Andre [1 ]
Herbort, Mirco [1 ]
Raschke, Michael J. [1 ]
Petersen, Wolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilhelm Univ Muenster, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconsturct surg, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2007年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
hamstring graft fixation; biomechanics; maximal load; tensile stress; failure mode; cyclic testing;
D O I
10.1177/0363546506297906
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The literature provides little biomechanical data about femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hypothesis: A hybrid fixation technique with use of an undersized screw has sufficient strength to provide secure fixation of posterior cruciate ligament grafts. Additional aperture fixation with a biodegradable interference screw can prevent graft damage that might be caused by an acute angle on the edge of the femoral tunnel. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In part 1, extracortical fixation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with quadrupled porcine flexor digitorum grafts to simulate human hamstring grafts was compared with hybrid fixation methods using 6-, 7-, and 8-mm screws. Groups were tested in cycling loading with the load applied in line with the bone tunnel. In part 2, extracortical fixation was compared with hybrid fixation using a 1-mm undersized screw anterior and posterior to the graft. Structural properties and graft abrasion were evaluated after cyclic loading with the load applied at 901 to the tunnel. In each group, 8 porcine knees were tested. Results: In part 1, stiffness, maximum load, and yield load were significantly higher for hybrid fixation than for extracortical fixation. Hybrid fixation with an 8-mm screw resulted in higher yield load than with a 7-mm screw. In part 2, graft laceration was more pronounced in specimens with extracortical fixation than with hybrid fixation. Posterior screw placement was superior to the anterior position. Conclusion: For all parameters, hybrid fixation with an interference screw provided superior structural results. No relevant disadvantages of undersized screws could be found. Graft damage due to abrasion at the edge of the femoral bone tunnel was reduced by use of an interference screw. The posterior screw placement seems favorable. Clinical Relevance: Hybrid fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to extracortical fixation alone with no relevant disadvantages of undersized screws. The results raise the suspicion of an acute angle effect of the femoral bone tunnel.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 786
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for reconstruction of tibial avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Marco Ezechieli
    Madeline Schäfer
    Christoph Becher
    Antonios Dratzidis
    Richard Glaab
    Christian Ryf
    Christof Hurschler
    Max Ettinger
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 919 - 923
  • [22] Suspensory Fixation of Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Implants
    Kamelger, Florian S.
    Onder, Ursula
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Tecklenburg, Katja
    Arora, Rohit
    Fink, Christian
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (07): : 767 - 776
  • [23] The effect of screw length and position on fixation of four-stranded hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Harvey, AR
    Thomas, NP
    Amis, AA
    KNEE, 2003, 10 (01): : 97 - 102
  • [24] Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques
    Hamner, DL
    Brown, CH
    Steiner, ME
    Hecker, AT
    Hayes, WC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04): : 549 - 557
  • [25] Interference screw fixation of hamstring vs patellar tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Aune A.K.
    Ekeland A.
    Cawley P.W.
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1998, 6 (2) : 99 - 102
  • [26] A Novel Graft Fixation Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts
    Li, Guoan
    Hosseini, Ali
    Gadikota, Hemanth
    Gill, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL DEVICES-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 12 (01):
  • [27] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Fixation Techniques
    McDermott, Emily R.
    Aman, Zachary S.
    Dekker, Travis J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2024, 40 (02): : 201 - 203
  • [28] Fastlok Tibial Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Gobbi, Alberto
    Francisco, Ramces
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 274 - 277
  • [29] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Assessment of the hamstring autograft femoral fixation using the EndoButton CL®
    Plaweski, S.
    Rossi, J.
    Merloz, P.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2009, 95 (08) : 606 - 613
  • [30] Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques:: The impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading
    Scheffler, SU
    Südkamp, NP
    Göckenjan, A
    Hoffmann, RFG
    Weiler, A
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (03): : 304 - 315