Femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques - Is there an acutle angle effect?

被引:9
|
作者
Niedzwietzki, Patricia [1 ]
Zantop, Thore [1 ]
Weimann, Andre [1 ]
Herbort, Mirco [1 ]
Raschke, Michael J. [1 ]
Petersen, Wolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilhelm Univ Muenster, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconsturct surg, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2007年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
hamstring graft fixation; biomechanics; maximal load; tensile stress; failure mode; cyclic testing;
D O I
10.1177/0363546506297906
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The literature provides little biomechanical data about femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hypothesis: A hybrid fixation technique with use of an undersized screw has sufficient strength to provide secure fixation of posterior cruciate ligament grafts. Additional aperture fixation with a biodegradable interference screw can prevent graft damage that might be caused by an acute angle on the edge of the femoral tunnel. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In part 1, extracortical fixation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with quadrupled porcine flexor digitorum grafts to simulate human hamstring grafts was compared with hybrid fixation methods using 6-, 7-, and 8-mm screws. Groups were tested in cycling loading with the load applied in line with the bone tunnel. In part 2, extracortical fixation was compared with hybrid fixation using a 1-mm undersized screw anterior and posterior to the graft. Structural properties and graft abrasion were evaluated after cyclic loading with the load applied at 901 to the tunnel. In each group, 8 porcine knees were tested. Results: In part 1, stiffness, maximum load, and yield load were significantly higher for hybrid fixation than for extracortical fixation. Hybrid fixation with an 8-mm screw resulted in higher yield load than with a 7-mm screw. In part 2, graft laceration was more pronounced in specimens with extracortical fixation than with hybrid fixation. Posterior screw placement was superior to the anterior position. Conclusion: For all parameters, hybrid fixation with an interference screw provided superior structural results. No relevant disadvantages of undersized screws could be found. Graft damage due to abrasion at the edge of the femoral bone tunnel was reduced by use of an interference screw. The posterior screw placement seems favorable. Clinical Relevance: Hybrid fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to extracortical fixation alone with no relevant disadvantages of undersized screws. The results raise the suspicion of an acute angle effect of the femoral bone tunnel.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 786
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of Outcomes of Two Femoral Fixation Devices in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Angel Sanchez-Carrasco, Miguel
    Francisco Abellan, Juan
    Qudsi-Sinclair, Salima
    Ruiz-Merino, Guadalupe
    Javier Carrillo-Julia, Francisco
    Bo-Rueda, David
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 51 (05) : 487 - 492
  • [12] Endobutton Femoral Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Results
    Prodromos, Chadwick
    Joyce, Brian
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 233 - 237
  • [13] Biosteon Cross Pin Femoral Fixation and Tibial Interference Screw Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Stewart, Andrew M.
    Paulos, Lonnie E.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [14] Femoral press-fit fixation of the hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Jagodzinski, M
    Behfar, V
    Hurschler, C
    Albrecht, K
    Krettet, C
    Bosch, U
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (07): : 1723 - 1730
  • [15] Comparison of Outcomes of Two Femoral Fixation Devices in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Miguel Angel Sánchez-Carrasco
    Juan Francisco Abellán
    Salima Qudsi-Sinclair
    Guadalupe Ruiz-Merino
    Francisco Javier Carrillo-Juliá
    David Bo-Rueda
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2017, 51 : 487 - 492
  • [16] Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral cross-pin fixation
    Wolf, EM
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 7 (04) : 214 - 222
  • [17] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with short hamstring grafts: the choice of femoral fixation device matters in controlling overall lengthening
    Pacull, Romain
    Kalk, Etienne
    Rongieras, Frederic
    Bertani, Antoine
    Gras, Laure-Lise
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (07) : 2215 - 2226
  • [18] Interference screw divergence in femoral tunnel fixation during endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring grafts
    Miller, CM
    Tibone, JE
    Hewitt, M
    Kharrazi, FD
    ElAttrache, NS
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (05): : 510 - 514
  • [19] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with short hamstring grafts: the choice of femoral fixation device matters in controlling overall lengthening
    Romain Pacull
    Etienne Kalk
    Frédéric Rongieras
    Antoine Bertani
    Laure-Lise Gras
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 2215 - 2226
  • [20] Biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for reconstruction of tibial avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Ezechieli, Marco
    Schaefer, Madeline
    Becher, Christoph
    Dratzidis, Antonios
    Glaab, Richard
    Ryf, Christian
    Hurschler, Christof
    Ettinger, Max
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (05) : 919 - 923