Femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques - Is there an acutle angle effect?

被引:9
|
作者
Niedzwietzki, Patricia [1 ]
Zantop, Thore [1 ]
Weimann, Andre [1 ]
Herbort, Mirco [1 ]
Raschke, Michael J. [1 ]
Petersen, Wolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilhelm Univ Muenster, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconsturct surg, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2007年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
hamstring graft fixation; biomechanics; maximal load; tensile stress; failure mode; cyclic testing;
D O I
10.1177/0363546506297906
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The literature provides little biomechanical data about femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hypothesis: A hybrid fixation technique with use of an undersized screw has sufficient strength to provide secure fixation of posterior cruciate ligament grafts. Additional aperture fixation with a biodegradable interference screw can prevent graft damage that might be caused by an acute angle on the edge of the femoral tunnel. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In part 1, extracortical fixation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with quadrupled porcine flexor digitorum grafts to simulate human hamstring grafts was compared with hybrid fixation methods using 6-, 7-, and 8-mm screws. Groups were tested in cycling loading with the load applied in line with the bone tunnel. In part 2, extracortical fixation was compared with hybrid fixation using a 1-mm undersized screw anterior and posterior to the graft. Structural properties and graft abrasion were evaluated after cyclic loading with the load applied at 901 to the tunnel. In each group, 8 porcine knees were tested. Results: In part 1, stiffness, maximum load, and yield load were significantly higher for hybrid fixation than for extracortical fixation. Hybrid fixation with an 8-mm screw resulted in higher yield load than with a 7-mm screw. In part 2, graft laceration was more pronounced in specimens with extracortical fixation than with hybrid fixation. Posterior screw placement was superior to the anterior position. Conclusion: For all parameters, hybrid fixation with an interference screw provided superior structural results. No relevant disadvantages of undersized screws could be found. Graft damage due to abrasion at the edge of the femoral bone tunnel was reduced by use of an interference screw. The posterior screw placement seems favorable. Clinical Relevance: Hybrid fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to extracortical fixation alone with no relevant disadvantages of undersized screws. The results raise the suspicion of an acute angle effect of the femoral bone tunnel.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 786
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical evaluation of different anterior cruciate ligament fixation techniques for hamstring graft
    Monaco, E.
    Labianca, L.
    Speranza, A.
    Agro, A. M.
    Camillieri, G.
    D'Arrigo, C.
    Ferretti, A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2010, 15 (01) : 125 - 131
  • [2] Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Aperture Femoral Fixation
    Mutnal, Amar
    Leo, Brian M.
    Vargas, Luis
    Colbrunn, Robb W.
    Butler, Robert S.
    Uribe, John W.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [3] Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Fixation Techniques
    Kleweno, Conor P.
    Jacir, Alberto M.
    Gardner, Thomas R.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    Levine, William N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02): : 339 - 345
  • [4] Cross-pin femoral fixation for hamstring posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    In, Y
    Bahk, WJ
    Kwon, OS
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2004, 20 (04): : E29 - E33
  • [5] A biomechanical evaluation of transcondylar femoral fixation of anterior cruciate ligament grafts
    Camillieri, G
    McFarland, EG
    Jasper, LE
    Belkoff, SM
    Kim, TK
    Rauh, PB
    Mariani, PP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (04): : 950 - 955
  • [6] Biomechanical Properties of Different Fixation Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures
    Domnick, Christoph
    Koesters, Clemens
    Franke, Friederike
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Petersen, Wolf
    Fink, Christian
    Herbort, Mirco
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (06): : 1065 - 1071
  • [7] A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL TECHNIQUES OF GRAFT FIXATION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    KUROSAKA, M
    YOSHIYA, S
    ANDRISH, JT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1987, 15 (03): : 225 - 229
  • [8] Tibial Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Paulos, Lonnie E.
    Stewart, Andrew M.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 303 - 305
  • [9] Biomechanical testing of hybrid hamstring graft tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yoo, Jae Chul
    Ahn, Jin Hwan
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Byung Kwan
    Choi, Kui Won
    Bae, Tae Soo
    Lee, Chang Yang
    KNEE, 2006, 13 (06): : 455 - 459
  • [10] THE BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENT POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
    Guo, Na
    Qi, Yansong
    Yang, Biao
    Han, Zhonghao
    Hu, Lei
    Xu, Yongsheng
    Wang, Tianmiao
    Yu, Jiakuo
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 18 (08)