Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients

被引:37
|
作者
Sahin, Afsun [1 ]
Niyaz, Leyla [1 ]
Yildirim, Nilgun [1 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Eskisehir, Meselik, Turkey
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2007年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometer; intraocular pressure; rebound tonometer;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01451.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the agreement between the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) by the rebound tonometer (RBT) and by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and to find out the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) values on IOP measurements in glaucoma patients. Methods: IOP was measured with the RBT and GAT, respectively, in 61 eyes of 61 glaucoma patients. CCT was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter after all IOP determinations had been made. The mean IOP measurement by the RBT was compared with the measurement by the GAT, by Student's t-test. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the clinical agreement between the two methods. The effect of CCT on measured IOP was explored by linear regression analysis. Results: The mean patient age was 56.7 +/- 21.1 years (range: 30-80 years). There were 32 (52.46%) women and 29 (47.54%) men in the study group. The mean IOP readings were 18.70 +/- 4.76 mmHg using the RBT, and 18.27 +/- 3.49 mmHg using the GAT. The difference was not statistically significant (mean difference 0.43 +/- 2.55, P = 0.2). A frequency distribution of the differences demonstrated that in more than 80% of cases the IOP readings differed by < 2.3 mmHg between the RBT and GAT. There was a strong correlation between the RBT and GAT readings (r = 0.852, P < 0.0001). The IOP measurements with the two methods were correlated with CCT (r = 0.40, P = 0.02 for the RBT and r = 0.48, P < 0.0001 for the GAT). The IOP increased 1.1 mmHg and 8 mmHg for every 100-mu m increase in CCT for the GAT and RBT, respectively. Conclusion: The RBT slightly overestimated the IOP value by 0.43 mmHg on average when compared with the GAT. Nevertheless, the RBT readings appeared to be more affected by the various thicknesses of different corneas when compared with those obtained using the GAT.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 339
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    MOSES, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1958, 46 (06) : 865 - 869
  • [22] Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes
    Subramaniam, Arjun Gopal
    Allen, Penelope
    Toh, Tze'Yo
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2021, 64 (02) : 321 - 326
  • [23] Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population
    Fernandes, P
    Díaz-Rey, JA
    Queirós, A
    Gonzalez-Meijome, JM
    Jorge, J
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (05) : 436 - 440
  • [24] Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients
    Valero, B.
    Fenolland, J. -R.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Sendon, D.
    Mesnard, C.
    Sigaux, M.
    Giraud, J. -M.
    Renard, J. -P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2017, 40 (10): : 865 - 875
  • [25] Dynamic contour tonometer versus Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Erdurmus, Mesut
    Yagci, Ramazan
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (05) : 471 - 471
  • [26] THE MINIFIED GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    ODONOGHUE, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 78 (09) : 664 - 665
  • [27] Comparison of IOP Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare Rebound Tonometer, and Tono-Pen in Keratoconus Patients after MyoRing Implantation
    Rateb, Mahmoud
    Abdel-Radi, Mahmoud
    Eldaly, Zeiad
    Elmohamady, Mohamed Nagy
    El Din, Asaad Noor
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 2019
  • [28] CLINICAL COMPARISON OF THE XPERT(TM) NONCONTACT TONOMETER AND THE CONVENTIONAL GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    HANSEN, MK
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 73 (02): : 176 - 180
  • [29] Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Renier C.
    Zeyen T.
    Fieuws S.
    Vandenbroeck S.
    Stalmans I.
    International Ophthalmology, 2010, 30 (6) : 651 - 659
  • [30] IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma
    Gautam Sinha
    Shikha Gupta
    Shreyas Temkar
    Veena Pandey
    Ramanjit Sihota
    Tanuj Dada
    International Ophthalmology, 2015, 35 : 89 - 93