Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients

被引:37
|
作者
Sahin, Afsun [1 ]
Niyaz, Leyla [1 ]
Yildirim, Nilgun [1 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Eskisehir, Meselik, Turkey
来源
关键词
glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometer; intraocular pressure; rebound tonometer;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01451.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the agreement between the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) by the rebound tonometer (RBT) and by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and to find out the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) values on IOP measurements in glaucoma patients. Methods: IOP was measured with the RBT and GAT, respectively, in 61 eyes of 61 glaucoma patients. CCT was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter after all IOP determinations had been made. The mean IOP measurement by the RBT was compared with the measurement by the GAT, by Student's t-test. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the clinical agreement between the two methods. The effect of CCT on measured IOP was explored by linear regression analysis. Results: The mean patient age was 56.7 +/- 21.1 years (range: 30-80 years). There were 32 (52.46%) women and 29 (47.54%) men in the study group. The mean IOP readings were 18.70 +/- 4.76 mmHg using the RBT, and 18.27 +/- 3.49 mmHg using the GAT. The difference was not statistically significant (mean difference 0.43 +/- 2.55, P = 0.2). A frequency distribution of the differences demonstrated that in more than 80% of cases the IOP readings differed by < 2.3 mmHg between the RBT and GAT. There was a strong correlation between the RBT and GAT readings (r = 0.852, P < 0.0001). The IOP measurements with the two methods were correlated with CCT (r = 0.40, P = 0.02 for the RBT and r = 0.48, P < 0.0001 for the GAT). The IOP increased 1.1 mmHg and 8 mmHg for every 100-mu m increase in CCT for the GAT and RBT, respectively. Conclusion: The RBT slightly overestimated the IOP value by 0.43 mmHg on average when compared with the GAT. Nevertheless, the RBT readings appeared to be more affected by the various thicknesses of different corneas when compared with those obtained using the GAT.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 339
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Handheld Applanation Tonometer in Congenital Glaucoma
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    Saenz-Frances, Federico
    Vizzeri, Gianmarco
    Fernandez-Vidal, Ana
    Mendez-Hernandez, Carmen
    Garcia-Sanchez, Julian
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2009, 18 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [2] Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Gao, Feng
    Liu, Hu
    Zhao, Qing
    Pan, Yingzhe
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2017, 13 (05) : 1912 - 1916
  • [3] Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients
    Brusini, P
    Salvetat, ML
    Zeppieri, M
    Tosoni, C
    Parisi, L
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (03) : 213 - 217
  • [4] Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma
    Slack, J. M.
    Stiles, J.
    Moore, G. E.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2012, 171 (15) : 373 - +
  • [5] Comparison of Rebound Tonometer Icare-Pro and Goldmann Handheld Applanation Tonometer in Congenital Glaucoma
    Morales-Fernandez, Laura
    Borrego, Lara
    Martinez de la Casa, Jose
    Saenz-Frances, Federico
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [6] Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting
    Kim, Kyoung Nam
    Jeoung, Jin Wook
    Park, Ki Ho
    Yang, Min Kyu
    Kim, Dong Myung
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 91 (05) : E392 - E396
  • [7] Comparison of IOPen rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer at different IOP levels
    Fereydoun Farrahi
    Farideh Sharifipour
    Mohammad Malekahmadi
    Bahman Cheraghian
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013, (05) : 637 - 640
  • [8] Comparison of IOPen rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer at different IOP levels
    Farrahi, Fereydoun
    Sharifipour, Farideh
    Malekahmadi, Mohammad
    Cheraghian, Bahman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 6 (05) : 637 - 640
  • [9] Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists
    Abraham, L. M.
    Epasinghe, N. C. R.
    Selva, D.
    Casson, R.
    EYE, 2008, 22 (04) : 503 - 506
  • [10] Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists
    L M Abraham
    N C R Epasinghe
    D Selva
    R Casson
    Eye, 2008, 22 : 503 - 506