Predictive Utility of an Emergency Department Decision Support Tool in Patients With Active Suicidal Ideation

被引:15
|
作者
Boudreaux, Edwin D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larkin, Celine [1 ]
Kini, Nisha [3 ,12 ]
Capoccia, Lisa [4 ]
Allen, Michael H. [5 ]
Grumet, Julie Goldstein [4 ]
Silverman, Morton M. [4 ]
McKeon, Richard [6 ]
Barton, Bruce [3 ]
Miller, Ivan [7 ,8 ]
Formica, Scott W. [9 ]
Camargo, Carlos A., Jr. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[4] Educ Dev Ctr, Waltham, MA USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Subst Abuse & Mental Hlth Serv Adm, Rockville, MD USA
[7] Brown Univ, Brown Med Sch, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[8] Butler Hosp, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[9] Social Sci Res & Evaluat Inc, Burlington, MA USA
[10] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[11] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[12] Terumo Europe NV, European Med & Clin Div, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
emergency department; suicide; decision support; prediction; RISK;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000236
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Emergency department (ED) clinicians routinely decide the disposition of patients with suicidal ideation, with potential consequences for patient safety, liability, and system costs and resources. An expert consensus panel recently created a 6-item decision support tool for patients with passive or active suicidal ideation. Individuals scoring a 0 (exhibiting none of the tool's 6 items) are considered "lower risk" and suitable for discharge, while those with non-0 scores are considered "elevated risk" and should receive further evaluation. The current study tested the predictive utility of this tool using existing data from the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation. ED patients with active suicide ideation (n = 1368) were followed for 12 months after an index visit using telephone assessment and medical chart review. About 1 in 5 patients had attempted suicide during follow-up. Because of the frequency of serious warning signs and risk factors in this population, only three patients met tool criteria for "lower risk" at baseline. The tool had perfect sensitivity, but exceptionally low specificity, in predicting suicidal behavior within 6 weeks and 12 months. In logistic regressoion analyses, several tool items were significantly associated with suicidal behavior within 6 weeks (suicide plan, past attempt) and 12 months (suicide plan, past attempt, suicide intent, significant mental health condition, irritability/agitation/aggression). Although the tool did not perform well as a binary instrument among those with active suicidal ideation, having a suicide plan identified almost all attempters while suicide plan and past attempt identified over four-fifths of near-term attempts.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 278
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing and managing suicidal patients in the emergency department
    Ryan, Christopher James
    Large, Matthew
    Gribble, Robert
    Macfarlane, Matthew
    Ilchef, Ralf
    Tietze, Tad
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 23 (05) : 513 - 516
  • [42] Improving Management of Suicidal Patients in the Emergency Department
    Heyland, Michelle
    Swanson, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION, 2018, 24 (04) : 394 - 395
  • [43] Reducing Admission for Anaphylaxis in a Pediatric Emergency Department Using a Clinical Decision Support Tool
    Wolpert, Katherine H.
    Kestle, Rebecca
    Weaver, Nicholas
    Huynh, Kelly
    Yoo, Minkyoung
    Nelson, Richard
    Lane, Roni D.
    PEDIATRIC QUALITY & SAFETY, 2022, 7 (05)
  • [44] Use of a simulation-based decision support tool to improve emergency department throughput
    Oh, Chongsun
    Novotny, April M.
    Carter, Pamela L.
    Ready, Ray K.
    Campbell, Diane D.
    Leckie, Maureen C.
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH FOR HEALTH CARE, 2016, 9 : 29 - 39
  • [45] Examining the predictive utility of suicidal ideation characteristics in relation to real-time monitoring of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts at follow-up
    Rogers, Megan L.
    Bozzay, Melanie L.
    Hughes, Christopher D.
    Schatten, Heather T.
    Armey, Michael F.
    SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2024, 54 (06) : 982 - 992
  • [46] Which Chart Elements Accurately Identify Emergency Department Visits for Suicidal Ideation or Behavior?
    Arias, Sarah A.
    Boudreaux, Edwin D.
    Chen, Elizabeth
    Miller, Ivan
    Camargo, Carlos A., Jr.
    Jones, Richard N.
    Uebelacker, Lisa
    ARCHIVES OF SUICIDE RESEARCH, 2019, 23 (03) : 382 - 390
  • [47] A rapid review of emergency department interventions for children and young people presenting with suicidal ideation
    Virk, Farazi
    Waine, Julie
    Berry, Clio
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2022, 8 (02):
  • [48] Emergency Department Visits for Suicidal Ideation and Self-Harm in Rural and Urban Youths
    Hoffmann, Jennifer A.
    Hall, Matt
    Lorenz, Doug
    Berry, Jay G.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2021, 238 : 282 - +
  • [49] IS SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR ON THE RISE? CHILD AND ADOLESCENT TRENDS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS FOR SUICIDAL IDEATION AND SELF-HARM
    Kennedy, Allison
    Watson, Shannon T.
    Cloutier, Paula F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 58 (10): : S211 - S212
  • [50] Utility of predictive scales for emergency department patients with a new diagnosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
    Perry, Jeffrey J.
    English, Shane
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2025,