Predictive Utility of an Emergency Department Decision Support Tool in Patients With Active Suicidal Ideation

被引:15
|
作者
Boudreaux, Edwin D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larkin, Celine [1 ]
Kini, Nisha [3 ,12 ]
Capoccia, Lisa [4 ]
Allen, Michael H. [5 ]
Grumet, Julie Goldstein [4 ]
Silverman, Morton M. [4 ]
McKeon, Richard [6 ]
Barton, Bruce [3 ]
Miller, Ivan [7 ,8 ]
Formica, Scott W. [9 ]
Camargo, Carlos A., Jr. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[4] Educ Dev Ctr, Waltham, MA USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Subst Abuse & Mental Hlth Serv Adm, Rockville, MD USA
[7] Brown Univ, Brown Med Sch, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[8] Butler Hosp, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[9] Social Sci Res & Evaluat Inc, Burlington, MA USA
[10] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[11] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[12] Terumo Europe NV, European Med & Clin Div, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
emergency department; suicide; decision support; prediction; RISK;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000236
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Emergency department (ED) clinicians routinely decide the disposition of patients with suicidal ideation, with potential consequences for patient safety, liability, and system costs and resources. An expert consensus panel recently created a 6-item decision support tool for patients with passive or active suicidal ideation. Individuals scoring a 0 (exhibiting none of the tool's 6 items) are considered "lower risk" and suitable for discharge, while those with non-0 scores are considered "elevated risk" and should receive further evaluation. The current study tested the predictive utility of this tool using existing data from the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation. ED patients with active suicide ideation (n = 1368) were followed for 12 months after an index visit using telephone assessment and medical chart review. About 1 in 5 patients had attempted suicide during follow-up. Because of the frequency of serious warning signs and risk factors in this population, only three patients met tool criteria for "lower risk" at baseline. The tool had perfect sensitivity, but exceptionally low specificity, in predicting suicidal behavior within 6 weeks and 12 months. In logistic regressoion analyses, several tool items were significantly associated with suicidal behavior within 6 weeks (suicide plan, past attempt) and 12 months (suicide plan, past attempt, suicide intent, significant mental health condition, irritability/agitation/aggression). Although the tool did not perform well as a binary instrument among those with active suicidal ideation, having a suicide plan identified almost all attempters while suicide plan and past attempt identified over four-fifths of near-term attempts.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 278
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEPRESSION, SUICIDAL IDEATION, AND SUICIDAL ATTEMPT PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT; DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE COHORTS
    Chakravarthy, B.
    Hoonpongsimanont, W.
    Anderson, C. L.
    Habicht, M.
    Bruckner, T.
    Lotfipour, S.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2012, 18
  • [22] The Effect of an Electronic Decision Support Tool on Emergency Department Prescribing of Naloxone
    Kreshak, A. A.
    Tolia, V. M.
    Chan, T. C.
    Powell, R. A.
    Brennan, J. J.
    Killeen, J. P.
    Castillo, E. M.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : S143 - S143
  • [23] Depression, Suicidal Ideation, and Suicidal Attempt Presenting to the Emergency Department: Differences Between These Cohorts
    Chakravarthy, Bharath
    Hoonpongsimanont, Wirachin
    Anderson, Craig L.
    Habicht, Michael
    Bruckner, Tim
    Lotfipour, Shahram
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (02) : 211 - 216
  • [24] DEPRESSION, SUICIDAL IDEATION, AND SUICIDAL ATTEMPT PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT; DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE COHORTS
    Chakravarthy, B.
    Hoonpongsimanont, W.
    Anderson, C. L.
    Habicht, M.
    Bruckner, T.
    Lotfipour, S.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2015, 21
  • [25] DEPRESSION, SUICIDAL IDEATION, AND SUICIDAL ATTEMPT PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT; DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE COHORTS
    Chakravarthy, B.
    Hoonpongsimanont, W.
    Anderson, C. L.
    Habicht, M.
    Bruckner, T.
    Lotfipour, S.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2015, 21 : A34 - A34
  • [26] Trends in suicidal ideation in an emergency department during COVID-19
    Grossman, Mila N.
    Fry, Carrie E.
    Sorg, Emily
    MacLean, Rachel L.
    Nisavic, Mladen
    McDowell, Michal J.
    Masaki, Charles
    Bird, Suzanne
    Smith, Felicia
    Beach, Scott R.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2021, 150
  • [27] Rising Emergency Department Visits for Suicidal Ideation and Self-harm
    Kuehn, Bridget M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (10): : 917 - 917
  • [28] Demographic characteristics of individuals admitted to the Hospital for Suicidal Ideation in the emergency department
    Chang, Bernard P.
    Sano, Ellen D.
    Suh, Edward H.
    Tichter, Aleksandr
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (06): : 1174 - 1175
  • [29] Identification of avoidable patients at triage in a Paediatric Emergency Department: a decision support system using predictive analytics
    Viana, Joao
    Souza, Julio
    Rocha, Ruben
    Santos, Almeida
    Freitas, Alberto
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [30] Predictive-collaborative model as recovery and validation tool. Case of study: Psychiatric emergency department decision support
    Cano, Jose-Ramon
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (04) : 4044 - 4048