Partial breast brachytherapy after lumpectomy: Low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate experience

被引:129
|
作者
Arthur, DW
Koo, D
Zwicker, RD
Tong, SD
Bear, HD
Kaplan, BJ
Kavanagh, BD
Warwicke, LA
Holdford, D
Amir, C
Archer, KJ
Schmidt-Ullrich, RK
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Div Surg Oncol, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
brachytherapy; breast cancer; breast-conserving therapy; accelerated partial breast irradiation;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00120-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The use of partial breast brachytherapy (PBB) after lumpectomy for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer reduces the adjuvant radiotherapy treatment time to <1 week. Despite the advantages of accelerated treatment, maintaining an acceptable cosmetic outcome is important. In a cohort of patients who received low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) PBB after lumpectomy, the clinical characteristics and treatment parameters were analyzed to identify predictors for an unfavorable cosmetic outcome. Methods and Materials: Early-stage breast cancer patients with clear resection margins and 0-3 positive lymph nodes were eligible for PBB. Uniform guidelines for target definition and brachytherapy catheter placement were applied. The HDR PBB dose was 34 Gy in 10 fractions within 5 days, and the LDR dose was 45 Gy given at a rate of 50 cGy/h. The end points included incidence of radiation recall reaction, telangiectasias, and cosmetic-altering fibrosis. Results: Between 1995 and 2000, 44 patients with early-stage breast cancer received PBB without adjuvant external beam radiotherapy after lumpectomy (31 HDR PBB, 13 LDR PBB). After a median follow-up of 42 months (range 18-86), all patients remained locally controlled. The overall rate of good/excellent cosmetic outcome was 79.6% overall and 90% with HDR PBB. Radiation recall reactions occurred in 43% of patients (6 of 14) who received adriamycin. LDR PBB and adriamycin were significant predictors for late unfavorable cosmetic changes in univariate analysis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusion: Although a high rate of local control and good/excellent cosmetic outcome is provided with HDR PBB, the risk of unfavorable cosmetic changes when treated with both LDR PBB and adriamycin is noteworthy. This suggests that HDR PBB is preferred in patients for whom adriamycin is indicated. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 689
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-dose-rate, high-dose-rate, and pulsed-dose-rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: The very first comparison study
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Kumar, Pavnesh
    Subramani, Vellaiyan
    Giridhar, Prashanth
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2024, 16 (04) : 273 - 278
  • [32] TLD skin dose measurements and acute and late effects after lumpectomy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy only for early breast cancer
    Perera, F
    Chisela, F
    Stitt, L
    Engel, J
    Venkatesan, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (05): : 1283 - 1290
  • [33] High-dose-rate brachytherapy and pulsed brachytherapy
    Mazeron, JJ
    EUROCANCER 2002, 2002, : 57 - 58
  • [34] Unexpected lower biochemical control of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost than low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Yoshida, Ken
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 24 : 10 - 10
  • [35] DOSE EQUIVALENCE FOR HIGH-DOSE-RATE TO LOW-DOSE-RATE INTRACAVITARY IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX
    AKINE, Y
    TOKITA, N
    OGINO, T
    KAJIURA, Y
    TSUKIYAMA, I
    EGAWA, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (06): : 1511 - 1514
  • [36] Low-Dose-Rate versus High-Dose-Rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervical cancer - Final Results of a Phase III randomized trial
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Lewis, Shirley
    Engineer, Reena
    Swamidas, Jamema
    Chopra, Supriya
    Gurram, Lavanya
    Kinhikar, Rajesh
    Deshpande, Deepak
    Kirisits, Christian
    Shrivastava, Shyamkishore
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (06) : 1146 - 1155
  • [37] PATIENT SPECIFIC MONTE CARLO DOSE CALCULATIONS OF HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY OF PARTIAL BREAST IRRADIATION
    Terribilini, D.
    Isaak, B.
    Manser, P.
    Frei, D.
    Volken, W.
    Mini, R.
    Fix, M. K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S517 - S517
  • [38] Relapse patterns after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Lamb, David S.
    Greig, Lynne
    FitzJohn, Trevor
    Russell, Grant L.
    Nacey, John N.
    Iupati, Douglas
    Woods, Lisa
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [39] EROS study: evaluation between high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate vaginal interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in terms of overall survival and rate of stenosis
    Autorino, Rosa
    Tagliaferri, Luca
    Campitelli, Maura
    Smaniotto, Daniela
    Nardangeli, Alessia
    Mattiucci, Gian Carlo
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Gui, Benedetta
    Micco, Maura
    Mascilini, Floriana
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Kovacs, Gyorgy
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (04) : 315 - 320
  • [40] The potential of low-dose-rate brachytherapy with iodine-1 25 in the treatment of local recurrences of prostate cancer after primary high-dose-rate monotherapy
    Burchardt, Wojciech M.
    Chyrek, Artur J.
    Bieleda, Grzegorz M.
    Burchardt, Ewa
    Chichel, Adam
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2023, 15 (02) : 103 - 109