Partial breast brachytherapy after lumpectomy: Low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate experience

被引:129
|
作者
Arthur, DW
Koo, D
Zwicker, RD
Tong, SD
Bear, HD
Kaplan, BJ
Kavanagh, BD
Warwicke, LA
Holdford, D
Amir, C
Archer, KJ
Schmidt-Ullrich, RK
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Div Surg Oncol, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
brachytherapy; breast cancer; breast-conserving therapy; accelerated partial breast irradiation;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00120-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The use of partial breast brachytherapy (PBB) after lumpectomy for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer reduces the adjuvant radiotherapy treatment time to <1 week. Despite the advantages of accelerated treatment, maintaining an acceptable cosmetic outcome is important. In a cohort of patients who received low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) PBB after lumpectomy, the clinical characteristics and treatment parameters were analyzed to identify predictors for an unfavorable cosmetic outcome. Methods and Materials: Early-stage breast cancer patients with clear resection margins and 0-3 positive lymph nodes were eligible for PBB. Uniform guidelines for target definition and brachytherapy catheter placement were applied. The HDR PBB dose was 34 Gy in 10 fractions within 5 days, and the LDR dose was 45 Gy given at a rate of 50 cGy/h. The end points included incidence of radiation recall reaction, telangiectasias, and cosmetic-altering fibrosis. Results: Between 1995 and 2000, 44 patients with early-stage breast cancer received PBB without adjuvant external beam radiotherapy after lumpectomy (31 HDR PBB, 13 LDR PBB). After a median follow-up of 42 months (range 18-86), all patients remained locally controlled. The overall rate of good/excellent cosmetic outcome was 79.6% overall and 90% with HDR PBB. Radiation recall reactions occurred in 43% of patients (6 of 14) who received adriamycin. LDR PBB and adriamycin were significant predictors for late unfavorable cosmetic changes in univariate analysis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusion: Although a high rate of local control and good/excellent cosmetic outcome is provided with HDR PBB, the risk of unfavorable cosmetic changes when treated with both LDR PBB and adriamycin is noteworthy. This suggests that HDR PBB is preferred in patients for whom adriamycin is indicated. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 689
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate monotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: The case for low-dose-rate monotherapy - Counterpoint
    Stock, Richard G.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2006, 5 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [22] A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hathout, Lara
    Mahmoud, Omar
    Wang, Yaqun
    Vergalasova, Irina
    Barkati, Maroie
    Despres, Philippe
    Martin, Andre-Guy
    Foster, William
    Lacroix, Frederic
    Delouya, Guila
    Taussky, Daniel
    Morton, Gerard
    Vigneault, Eric
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 4 (04) : 631 - 640
  • [23] High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Yamada, Kei
    Okihara, Koji
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Yoshida, Ken
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Otani, Keisuke
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 162 - 170
  • [24] Comparing low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix: Results from a randomized controlled study
    Shrivastava, S.
    Dinshaw, K.
    Mahantshetty, U.
    Engineer, R.
    Patil, N.
    Deshpande, D.
    Tongaonkar, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S42 - S42
  • [25] Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy after breast conserving surgery
    Rulli, Antonio
    Barberini, Francesco
    Scialpi, Michele
    Izzo, Luciano
    D'Angeli, Ilaria
    Gori, Stefania
    Sidoni, Angelo
    Rondelli, Fabio
    Noya, Giuseppe
    Aristei, Cinzia
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2010, 24 (02) : 417 - 422
  • [26] INTRINSIC RADIOSENSITIVITY OF NORMAL HUMAN FIBROBLASTS AND LYMPHOCYTES AFTER HIGH-DOSE-RATE AND LOW-DOSE-RATE IRRADIATION
    GEARA, FB
    PETERS, LJ
    ANG, KK
    WIKE, JL
    SIVON, SS
    GUTTENBERGER, R
    CALLENDER, DL
    MALAISE, EP
    BROCK, WA
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1992, 52 (22) : 6348 - 6352
  • [27] Interstitial brachytherapy for lip carcinomas: Comparison between Ir-192 low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate treatment
    Cuenin, M.
    Salleron, J.
    Peiffert, D.
    Meknaci, E.
    Gallet, P.
    Abushama, Y.
    Py, J. -F
    Renard, S.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2024, 28 (02): : 145 - 151
  • [28] Adjuvant high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiation in soft tissue sarcoma: A comparison of outcomes
    Pohar, Surjeet
    Haq, Rashid
    Liu, Lizhong
    Koniarczyk, Michael
    Hahn, Seung
    Damron, Timothy
    Aronowitz, Jesse N.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2007, 6 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [29] Low-Dose-Rate and High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer in ABO-Incompatible Renal Transplant Recipients
    Tasaki, M.
    Kasahara, T.
    Kaidu, M.
    Kawaguchi, G.
    Hara, N.
    Yamana, K.
    Maruyama, R.
    Takizawa, I.
    Ishizaki, F.
    Saito, K.
    Nakagawa, Y.
    Ikeda, M.
    Umezu, H.
    Nishiyama, T.
    Aoyama, H.
    Tomita, Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 51 (03) : 774 - 778
  • [30] Initial Experience With Directional Low-Dose-Rate Intraoperative Brachytherapy
    Cavanaugh, S. X.
    Rothley, D. J.
    Dick, J. S.
    Swanson, J. W.
    Watkins, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E688 - E688