Partial breast brachytherapy after lumpectomy: Low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate experience

被引:129
|
作者
Arthur, DW
Koo, D
Zwicker, RD
Tong, SD
Bear, HD
Kaplan, BJ
Kavanagh, BD
Warwicke, LA
Holdford, D
Amir, C
Archer, KJ
Schmidt-Ullrich, RK
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biostat, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Div Surg Oncol, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
brachytherapy; breast cancer; breast-conserving therapy; accelerated partial breast irradiation;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00120-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The use of partial breast brachytherapy (PBB) after lumpectomy for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer reduces the adjuvant radiotherapy treatment time to <1 week. Despite the advantages of accelerated treatment, maintaining an acceptable cosmetic outcome is important. In a cohort of patients who received low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) PBB after lumpectomy, the clinical characteristics and treatment parameters were analyzed to identify predictors for an unfavorable cosmetic outcome. Methods and Materials: Early-stage breast cancer patients with clear resection margins and 0-3 positive lymph nodes were eligible for PBB. Uniform guidelines for target definition and brachytherapy catheter placement were applied. The HDR PBB dose was 34 Gy in 10 fractions within 5 days, and the LDR dose was 45 Gy given at a rate of 50 cGy/h. The end points included incidence of radiation recall reaction, telangiectasias, and cosmetic-altering fibrosis. Results: Between 1995 and 2000, 44 patients with early-stage breast cancer received PBB without adjuvant external beam radiotherapy after lumpectomy (31 HDR PBB, 13 LDR PBB). After a median follow-up of 42 months (range 18-86), all patients remained locally controlled. The overall rate of good/excellent cosmetic outcome was 79.6% overall and 90% with HDR PBB. Radiation recall reactions occurred in 43% of patients (6 of 14) who received adriamycin. LDR PBB and adriamycin were significant predictors for late unfavorable cosmetic changes in univariate analysis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusion: Although a high rate of local control and good/excellent cosmetic outcome is provided with HDR PBB, the risk of unfavorable cosmetic changes when treated with both LDR PBB and adriamycin is noteworthy. This suggests that HDR PBB is preferred in patients for whom adriamycin is indicated. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 689
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OUR EXPERIENCE IN LOW-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY PREVIOUSLY TO START THE HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST TECHNIQUE BREAST CANCER
    Castro, J. E.
    Gonzalez Patino, E.
    Salvador Garrido, N.
    Luna Vega, V.
    Varela Pazos, A.
    Anido Herranz, U.
    Lobato Busto, R.
    Porto Vazquez, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S201 - S201
  • [2] Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is superior to high-dose-rate brachytherapy for bladder cancer
    Pos, FJ
    Horenblas, S
    Lebesque, J
    Moonen, L
    Schneider, C
    Sminia, P
    Bartelink, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (03): : 696 - 705
  • [3] Postoperative management of keloids: Low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    De Cicco, Luigi
    Vischioni, Barbara
    Vavassori, Andrea
    Gherardi, Federica
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    Lazzari, Roberta
    Cattani, Federica
    Comi, Stefania
    De Lorenzi, Francesca
    Martella, Stefano
    Orecchia, Roberto
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2014, 13 (05) : 508 - 513
  • [4] INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY WITH LOW-DOSE-RATE AND HIGH-DOSE-RATE AFTERLOADING IN GYNECOLOGY
    BAUER, M
    GYNAKOLOGE, 1987, 20 (04): : 228 - 236
  • [5] Sigmoid dose delivered by high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Holloway, C. L.
    O'Farrell, D. A.
    Cormack, R. A.
    Viswanathan, A. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S165 - S165
  • [6] Comparison of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma
    Fayed, Alaa
    Mutch, David G.
    Rader, Janet S.
    Gibb, Randall K.
    Powell, Matthew A.
    Wright, Jason D.
    ElNaqa, Issam
    Zoberi, Imran
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (02): : 480 - 484
  • [7] HIGH-DOSE-RATE VERSUS LOW-DOSE-RATE INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX
    FU, KK
    PHILLIPS, TL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (03): : 791 - 796
  • [8] Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options
    Skowronek, Janusz
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 5 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [9] Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer
    Barnes, Justin
    Kennedy, William R.
    Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W.
    Baumann, Brian C.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Gay, Hiram A.
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (04) : 320 - 328
  • [10] Current controversies in high-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Stewart, Alexandra J.
    Viswanathan, Akila N.
    CANCER, 2006, 107 (05) : 908 - 915