Return-on-Investment Potential for US Army Missile Health Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Simmons, David R. [1 ]
Marotta, Stephen A. [2 ]
机构
[1] CGI Fed Inc, 7067 Old Madison Pike, Huntsville, AL 35806 USA
[2] US Army Aviat & Missile Res, Dev & Engn Ctr, RDMR SER, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Application of health monitoring technology and the capability to predict failures can potentially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of US Army missile sustainment. Sustainment functions throughout the weapon's lifecycle and across the spectrum of different Army missiles such as field testing, lab testing, inspections, retrograde, maintenance, reliability improvements, and supply functions offer many opportunities to better the sustainment status quo in both cost and performance. New technology solutions must however accrue benefits associated with metrics such as total life cycle cost, as well as other readiness-type metrics such as reporting accuracy, timeliness, uncertainty, and other factors. Application of health monitoring and failure prediction must provide an acceptably high return in benefits as compared to the investments needed upfront for development and deployment. Given those constraints, only the most innovative and well engineered applications of existing, emerging, and new technology will suffice in context even though overall sustainment improvements are highly desired. The information in this paper is intended to notionally describe the US Army's missile logistics and supply such that feasible and effective technology solutions can be targeted at specific processes, and thereby provide maximal quantifiable effect. The paper will also briefly address applied research currently being conducted that targets Return-on-Investment (ROI) risks and thereby better enable technology transition.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health monitoring of US Army Missile systems
    Vandiver, TL
    STRUCTURAL HEALT H MONITORING: CURRENT STATUS AND PERSPECTIVES, 1997, : 191 - 196
  • [2] Simplified return-on-investment
    Moonen, J
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2003, 11 (02) : 147 - 165
  • [3] Return-on-investment models
    Stone, PW
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2005, 18 (03) : 186 - 189
  • [4] Turning research into return-on-investment
    Mondello, M
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (04) : RC2 - RC6
  • [5] A Return-on-Investment Analysis of the Health Promotion Program At the University of Minnesota
    Nyman, John A.
    Barleen, Nathan A.
    Dowd, Bryan E.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 51 (01) : 54 - 65
  • [6] MODULARITY - IMPROVING NAVYS RETURN-ON-INVESTMENT
    JONS, OP
    DREWRY, JT
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1975, 87 (01) : 8 - 9
  • [7] ESTIMATED RETURN-ON-INVESTMENT OF OIL TANKSHIPS
    WALSH, RG
    MARINE TECHNOLOGY AND SNAME NEWS, 1978, 15 (01): : 51 - 74
  • [8] Improving alcohol management in primary health care in Mexico: A return-on-investment analysis
    Solovei, Adriana
    Rovira, Pol
    Anderson, Peter
    Jane-Llopis, Eva
    Rey, Guillermina Natera
    Arroyo, Miriam
    Medina, Perla
    Mercken, Liesbeth
    Rehm, Jurgen
    de Vries, Hein
    Manthey, Jakob
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2023, : 680 - 690
  • [9] Pharmaceutical marketing return-on-investment: a European perspective
    Rod, Michel
    Ashill, Nicholas J.
    Carruthers, Janet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTHCARE MARKETING, 2007, 1 (02) : 174 - +
  • [10] Return-on-investment (ROI) criteria for network design
    Menezes, Mozart B. C.
    Kim, Seokjin
    Huang, Rongbing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 245 (01) : 100 - 108