Evaluation of Integrating SWAT Model into a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards Reliable Rainwater Harvesting Systems

被引:14
|
作者
Doulabian, Shahab [1 ]
Tousi, Erfan Ghasemi [2 ]
Aghlmand, Reza [3 ]
Alizadeh, Babak [4 ]
Bafti, Alireza Ghaderi [3 ]
Abbasi, Ali [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shahrood Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Shahrood 3619995161, Semnan, Iran
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn & Mech, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Mashhad 9177948974, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[4] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Water Resources Sect, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
rainwater harvesting; multi-criteria decision analysis; geospatial techniques; SWAT model; arid and semi-arid regions; GIS-BASED APPROACH; IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL SITES; STATE GROUNDWATER INFLOW; RIVER-BASIN; LAND-USE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; SCS-CN; IDENTIFICATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/w13141935
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rainwater harvesting (RWH) has been recognized as one of the most reliable and efficient methods for water supply, especially in arid and semi-arid regions (ASARs) facing freshwater scarcity. Nevertheless, due to the inherent uncertainty of input data and subjectivity involved in the selection of influential parameters, the identification of RWH potential areas is a challenging procedure. In this study, two approaches for locating potential RWH sites were implemented. In the first approach, a frequently-used method of the multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information system (MCDA-GIS) was utilized, while, in the second approach, a novel strategy of integrating the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model as a hydrology model into an MCDA-GIS method was proposed to evaluate its performance in locating potential RWH sites. The Mashhad Plain Basin (MPB) was selected as a case study area. The developed potential RWH maps of the two approaches indicated similar patterns for potential RWH areas; in addition, the correlation coefficient (CC) between the two obtained maps were relatively high (i.e., CC = 0.914) revealing that integration of SWAT as a comprehensive hydrologic model does not necessarily result in very different outputs from the conventional method of MCDA-GIS for RWH evaluation. The overlap of developed maps of the two approaches indicated that 3394 km(2) of the study area, mainly located in the northern parts, was identified as high-potential RWH areas. The performed sensitivity analysis indicated that rainfall and slope criteria, with weights of 0.329 and 0.243, respectively, had the greatest sensitivity on the model in the first approach while in the second approach, the criterion of runoff coefficient (with weights of 0.358) had the highest impact. Based on results from the identification of the potential locations for conventional RWH techniques, pond and pan techniques are the most proper options, covering high-potential areas of RWH more effectively than other techniques over MPB.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards multi-criteria decision support for modelling and simulation
    Rajabally, E
    Dalton, J
    Sen, P
    Whittle, S
    1ST INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SIMULATION CONFERENCE 2003, 2003, : 83 - 87
  • [32] Evaluation of decision trees: a multi-criteria approach
    Osei-Bryson, KM
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (11) : 1933 - 1945
  • [33] Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Recommender Systems
    Zheng, Yong
    Wang, David
    COMPANION PROCEEDINGS OF 2023 28TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES, IUI 2023 COMPANION, 2023, : 181 - 184
  • [34] Towards a generic multi-criteria evaluation model for low carbon cities
    Azizalrahman, Hossny
    Hasyimi, Valid
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 39 : 275 - 282
  • [35] Quantification and Evaluation of Automation Concepts based on a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Neb, Alexander
    Remling, Dominik
    29TH CIRP DESIGN CONFERENCE 2019, 2019, 84 : 624 - 629
  • [37] Brain Drain: A Multi-criteria Decision Model
    Incekas, Ayse Basak
    Kadaifci, Cigdem
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 271 - 282
  • [38] Using multi-criteria decision analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems
    Talukder, Byomkesh
    Hipel, Keith W.
    vanLoon, Gary W.
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 26 (06) : 781 - 799
  • [39] Evaluation of Total Artificial Heart Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Denker, Ali
    Almasri, Abdullah
    Ozsahin, Dilber Uzun
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS (ICAAM 2020), 2021, 2325
  • [40] Decision analysis and multi-criteria evaluation using complex DEA models
    Pieter, Michal
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2018), 2018, : 416 - 421