Evaluation of Integrating SWAT Model into a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards Reliable Rainwater Harvesting Systems

被引:14
|
作者
Doulabian, Shahab [1 ]
Tousi, Erfan Ghasemi [2 ]
Aghlmand, Reza [3 ]
Alizadeh, Babak [4 ]
Bafti, Alireza Ghaderi [3 ]
Abbasi, Ali [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shahrood Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Shahrood 3619995161, Semnan, Iran
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn & Mech, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Mashhad 9177948974, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[4] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Water Resources Sect, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
rainwater harvesting; multi-criteria decision analysis; geospatial techniques; SWAT model; arid and semi-arid regions; GIS-BASED APPROACH; IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL SITES; STATE GROUNDWATER INFLOW; RIVER-BASIN; LAND-USE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; SCS-CN; IDENTIFICATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/w13141935
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rainwater harvesting (RWH) has been recognized as one of the most reliable and efficient methods for water supply, especially in arid and semi-arid regions (ASARs) facing freshwater scarcity. Nevertheless, due to the inherent uncertainty of input data and subjectivity involved in the selection of influential parameters, the identification of RWH potential areas is a challenging procedure. In this study, two approaches for locating potential RWH sites were implemented. In the first approach, a frequently-used method of the multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information system (MCDA-GIS) was utilized, while, in the second approach, a novel strategy of integrating the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model as a hydrology model into an MCDA-GIS method was proposed to evaluate its performance in locating potential RWH sites. The Mashhad Plain Basin (MPB) was selected as a case study area. The developed potential RWH maps of the two approaches indicated similar patterns for potential RWH areas; in addition, the correlation coefficient (CC) between the two obtained maps were relatively high (i.e., CC = 0.914) revealing that integration of SWAT as a comprehensive hydrologic model does not necessarily result in very different outputs from the conventional method of MCDA-GIS for RWH evaluation. The overlap of developed maps of the two approaches indicated that 3394 km(2) of the study area, mainly located in the northern parts, was identified as high-potential RWH areas. The performed sensitivity analysis indicated that rainfall and slope criteria, with weights of 0.329 and 0.243, respectively, had the greatest sensitivity on the model in the first approach while in the second approach, the criterion of runoff coefficient (with weights of 0.358) had the highest impact. Based on results from the identification of the potential locations for conventional RWH techniques, pond and pan techniques are the most proper options, covering high-potential areas of RWH more effectively than other techniques over MPB.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Introduction to Minitrack: Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Support Systems
    Chin, Amita Goyal
    Ghosh, Preetam
    Roy, Nirmalya
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 1789 - 1790
  • [22] Introduction to Minitrack: Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Support Systems
    Chin, Amita Goyal
    Weistroffer, H. Roland
    Sarin, Rakesh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2018, : 1462 - 1462
  • [23] Multi-criteria decision analysis towards robust service quality measurement
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Yazdani, Morteza
    Montero-Simo, Mara Jose
    Araque-Padilla, Rafael A.
    Mohammed, Ahmed
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 170
  • [24] Groundwater Potential Mapping Using SWAT and GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yifru, Bisrat Ayalew
    Mitiku, Dereje Birhanu
    Tolera, Mesfin Benti
    Chang, Sun Woo
    Chung, Il-Moon
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 24 (08) : 2546 - 2559
  • [25] Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for a GIS-based Urban Firehouse
    Wu, Qiaoyan
    Zhang, Jiquan
    Tong, Zhijun
    Liu, Xingpeng
    CHINESE PERSPECTIVE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2010, 13 : 302 - +
  • [26] Groundwater Potential Mapping Using SWAT and GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Bisrat Ayalew Yifru
    Dereje Birhanu Mitiku
    Mesfin Benti Tolera
    Sun Woo Chang
    Il-Moon Chung
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 24 : 2546 - 2559
  • [27] Integrating the Stochastic Multi-criteria Acceptability Analysis with the MULTIMOORA Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Mi, Xiaomei
    Liao, Huchang
    Al-Barakati, Abdullah
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL 1, 2020, 1001 : 558 - 565
  • [28] Appendix A: Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Linkov, I
    Steevens, J.
    CYANOBACTERIAL HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: STATE OF THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH NEEDS, 2008, 619 : 815 - 829
  • [29] Presumption of model adequacy in fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis
    Yatsalo, B.
    Korobov, A.
    Martinez, L.
    DEVELOPMENTS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPUTATION AND ROBOTICS, 2020, 12 : 759 - 766
  • [30] Multi-species duck harvesting using dynamic programming and multi-criteria decision analysis
    Johnson, Fred A.
    Zimmerman, Guthrie S.
    Huang, Min T.
    Padding, Paul I.
    Balkcom, Gregory D.
    Runge, Michael C.
    Devers, Patrick K.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (06) : 1447 - 1459