AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY

被引:3
|
作者
Kervroedan, Lea [1 ]
Houben, David [1 ]
Guidet, Julien [1 ]
Denier, Julia [1 ]
Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti [1 ]
Marraccini, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Deligey, Amandine [2 ,4 ]
Journel, Charlotte [4 ]
Lamerre, Justine [4 ]
Faucon, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, AGHYLE SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[2] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, InTerACT 2018 C102, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Agrotransfert Ressources & Terr, 2 Chaussee Brunehaut, F-80200 Estrees Mons, France
关键词
alternative cropping systems; bioeconomy; biogas; biomass production; fertilization autonomy; greenhouse gas assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SORGHUM BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; BALANCE; YIELD;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2021435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy, currently the largest renewable energy source in the EU (64% of the total renewable energy consumption), has sparked great interest to meet the 32% renewable resources for the 2030 bioeconomy goal. The design of innovative cropping systems informed by bioeconomy imperatives requires the evaluate of the effects of introducing crops for bioenergy into conventional crop rotations. This study aimed to assess the impacts of changes in conventional cropping systems in mixed dairy cattle farms redesigned to introduce bioenergy crops either by increasing the biomass production through an increase of cover crops, while keeping main feed/food crops, or by substituting food crops with an increase of the crop rotation length. The assessment is based on the comparison between conventional and innovative systems oriented to feed and biogas production, with and without tillage, to evaluate their agri-environmental performances (biomass production, nitrogen fertilization autonomy, greenhouse gas emissions and biogas production). The result showed higher values in the biogas cropping system than in the conventional and feed ones for all indicators, biomass productivity (27% and 20% higher, respectively), nitrogen fertilization autonomy (26% and 73% higher, respectively), methanogenic potential (77% and 41% higher, respectively) and greenhouse gas emissions (15% and 3% higher, respectively). There were no negative impacts of no-till compared to the tillage practice, for all tested variables. The biogas cropping system showed a better potential in terms of agri-environmental performance, although its greenhouse gas emissions were higher. Consequently, it would be appropriate to undertake a multicriteria assessment integrating agri-environmental, economic and social performances. (C) The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 294
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing climate-resilient agri-environmental production systems
    Khalil, Mohammad Ibrahim
    Osborne, Bruce
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2022, 123 (1-2) : 1 - 4
  • [32] Interaction of important agri-environmental indicators in sugarbeet cultivation systems
    Deumelandt, Peter
    Christen, Olaf
    ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2008, 133 (11): : 719 - 728
  • [33] Developing climate-resilient agri-environmental production systems
    Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil
    Bruce Osborne
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2022, 123 : 1 - 4
  • [34] A goal oriented indicator framework to support integrated assessment of new policies for agri-environmental systems
    Olsson, Johanna Alkan
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Stapleton, Lee M.
    Ewert, Frank
    Knapen, Rob
    Therond, Olivier
    Geniaux, Ghislain
    Bellon, Stephane
    Correira, Teresa Pinto
    Turpin, Nadine
    Bezlepkina, Irina
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2009, 12 (05) : 562 - 572
  • [35] Productivity and Nutrient Dynamics in Bioenergy Double-Cropping Systems
    Heggenstaller, Andrew H.
    Anex, Robert P.
    Liebman, Matt
    Sundberg, David N.
    Gibson, Lance R.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (06) : 1740 - 1748
  • [36] Technoeconomic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Biorefineries for Bioenergy and Polyphenolic Production from Pomace Biomass
    Okoro, Oseweuba Valentine
    Nie, Lei
    Podstawczyk, Daria
    Shavandi, Amin
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (03) : 1639 - 1653
  • [37] Technoeconomic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Biorefineries for Bioenergy and Polyphenolic Production from Pomace Biomass
    Oseweuba Valentine Okoro
    Lei Nie
    Daria Podstawczyk
    Amin Shavandi
    BioEnergy Research, 2023, 16 : 1639 - 1653
  • [38] Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change
    Burton, Rob J. F.
    Schwarz, G.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) : 628 - 641
  • [39] Indicator-based agri-environmental direct payments: Assessment of three systems of different complexity levels
    Roesch, Andreas
    Flury, Christian
    Nemecek, Thomas
    Mann, Stefan
    Ritzel, Christian
    Gilgen, Anina
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 147
  • [40] Agri-Environmental impact on main productivity traits of the Valdostana breed raised in Transylvanian area
    Onaciu, Grigore
    Vidu, Livia
    Jurco, Eugen
    ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 2016, 21 (03): : 11462 - 11470