AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY

被引:3
|
作者
Kervroedan, Lea [1 ]
Houben, David [1 ]
Guidet, Julien [1 ]
Denier, Julia [1 ]
Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti [1 ]
Marraccini, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Deligey, Amandine [2 ,4 ]
Journel, Charlotte [4 ]
Lamerre, Justine [4 ]
Faucon, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, AGHYLE SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[2] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, InTerACT 2018 C102, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Agrotransfert Ressources & Terr, 2 Chaussee Brunehaut, F-80200 Estrees Mons, France
关键词
alternative cropping systems; bioeconomy; biogas; biomass production; fertilization autonomy; greenhouse gas assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SORGHUM BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; BALANCE; YIELD;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2021435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy, currently the largest renewable energy source in the EU (64% of the total renewable energy consumption), has sparked great interest to meet the 32% renewable resources for the 2030 bioeconomy goal. The design of innovative cropping systems informed by bioeconomy imperatives requires the evaluate of the effects of introducing crops for bioenergy into conventional crop rotations. This study aimed to assess the impacts of changes in conventional cropping systems in mixed dairy cattle farms redesigned to introduce bioenergy crops either by increasing the biomass production through an increase of cover crops, while keeping main feed/food crops, or by substituting food crops with an increase of the crop rotation length. The assessment is based on the comparison between conventional and innovative systems oriented to feed and biogas production, with and without tillage, to evaluate their agri-environmental performances (biomass production, nitrogen fertilization autonomy, greenhouse gas emissions and biogas production). The result showed higher values in the biogas cropping system than in the conventional and feed ones for all indicators, biomass productivity (27% and 20% higher, respectively), nitrogen fertilization autonomy (26% and 73% higher, respectively), methanogenic potential (77% and 41% higher, respectively) and greenhouse gas emissions (15% and 3% higher, respectively). There were no negative impacts of no-till compared to the tillage practice, for all tested variables. The biogas cropping system showed a better potential in terms of agri-environmental performance, although its greenhouse gas emissions were higher. Consequently, it would be appropriate to undertake a multicriteria assessment integrating agri-environmental, economic and social performances. (C) The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 294
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agri-environmental implications of N- and P-based manure application to perennial and annual cropping systems
    Vivekananthan Kokulan
    Dupe Ige
    Olalekan O. Akinremi
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2022, 122 : 205 - 218
  • [22] Agri-environmental implications of N- and P-based manure application to perennial and annual cropping systems
    Kokulan, Vivekananthan
    Ige, Dupe
    Akinremi, Olalekan O.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2022, 122 (02) : 205 - 218
  • [23] METHODICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES
    Galnaityte, Aiste
    MANAGEMENT THEORY AND STUDIES FOR RURAL BUSINESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 36 (04): : 810 - 822
  • [24] Economic assessment of rewilding versus agri-environmental nature management
    Schou, Jesper Solver
    Bladt, Jesper
    Ejrnaes, Rasmus
    Thomsen, Maria Nygard
    Vedel, Suzanne Elizabeth
    Flojgaard, Camilla
    AMBIO, 2021, 50 (05) : 1047 - 1057
  • [25] A multitaxa assessment of the effectiveness of agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity management
    Boetzl, Fabian A.
    Krauss, Jochen
    Heinze, Jonathan
    Hoffmann, Hannes
    Juffa, Jan
    Konig, Sebastian
    Krimmer, Elena
    Prante, Maren
    Martin, Emily A.
    Holzschuh, Andrea
    Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (10)
  • [26] Economic assessment of rewilding versus agri-environmental nature management
    Jesper Sølver Schou
    Jesper Bladt
    Rasmus Ejrnæs
    Maria Nygård Thomsen
    Suzanne Elizabeth Vedel
    Camilla Fløjgaard
    Ambio, 2021, 50 : 1047 - 1057
  • [27] Professional farmer collectives for effective agri-environmental management: an assessment
    Dik, L.
    Westerink, J.
    van der Linde, A. W.
    Olieman, A. A. M.
    Termeer, C. J. A. M.
    Runhaar, H. A. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [28] Agri-environmental assessment of extractable soil phosphorus at the regional scale
    Castoldi, N.
    Stein, A.
    Bechini, L.
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2009, 56 (04) : 325 - 343
  • [29] A Comparative View of Agri-Environmental Indicators and Stakeholders' Assessment of Their Quality
    Spanu, Ionut-Alexandru
    Ozunu, Alexandru
    Petrescu, Dacinia Crina
    Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [30] Agri-environmental policy systems in transition and preparation for EU membership
    Zellei, A
    Gorton, M
    Lowe, P
    LAND USE POLICY, 2005, 22 (03) : 225 - 234