AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY

被引:3
|
作者
Kervroedan, Lea [1 ]
Houben, David [1 ]
Guidet, Julien [1 ]
Denier, Julia [1 ]
Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti [1 ]
Marraccini, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Deligey, Amandine [2 ,4 ]
Journel, Charlotte [4 ]
Lamerre, Justine [4 ]
Faucon, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, AGHYLE SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[2] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, InTerACT 2018 C102, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Agrotransfert Ressources & Terr, 2 Chaussee Brunehaut, F-80200 Estrees Mons, France
关键词
alternative cropping systems; bioeconomy; biogas; biomass production; fertilization autonomy; greenhouse gas assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SORGHUM BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; BALANCE; YIELD;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2021435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy, currently the largest renewable energy source in the EU (64% of the total renewable energy consumption), has sparked great interest to meet the 32% renewable resources for the 2030 bioeconomy goal. The design of innovative cropping systems informed by bioeconomy imperatives requires the evaluate of the effects of introducing crops for bioenergy into conventional crop rotations. This study aimed to assess the impacts of changes in conventional cropping systems in mixed dairy cattle farms redesigned to introduce bioenergy crops either by increasing the biomass production through an increase of cover crops, while keeping main feed/food crops, or by substituting food crops with an increase of the crop rotation length. The assessment is based on the comparison between conventional and innovative systems oriented to feed and biogas production, with and without tillage, to evaluate their agri-environmental performances (biomass production, nitrogen fertilization autonomy, greenhouse gas emissions and biogas production). The result showed higher values in the biogas cropping system than in the conventional and feed ones for all indicators, biomass productivity (27% and 20% higher, respectively), nitrogen fertilization autonomy (26% and 73% higher, respectively), methanogenic potential (77% and 41% higher, respectively) and greenhouse gas emissions (15% and 3% higher, respectively). There were no negative impacts of no-till compared to the tillage practice, for all tested variables. The biogas cropping system showed a better potential in terms of agri-environmental performance, although its greenhouse gas emissions were higher. Consequently, it would be appropriate to undertake a multicriteria assessment integrating agri-environmental, economic and social performances. (C) The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 294
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY
    Léa KERVRO?DAN
    David HOUBEN
    Julien GUIDET
    Julia DENIER
    Anne-Ma?miti DULAURENT
    Elisa MARRACCINI
    Amandine DELIGEY
    Charlotte JOURNEL
    Justine LAMERRE
    Michel-Pierre FAUCON
    Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2022, 9 (02) : 284 - 294
  • [2] Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Guichard, Laurence
    Makowski, David
    Aveline, Anne
    Girardin, Philippe
    Plantureux, Sylvain
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 28 (01) : 139 - 149
  • [3] Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review
    Christian Bockstaller
    Laurence Guichard
    David Makowski
    Anne Aveline
    Philippe Girardin
    Sylvain Plantureux
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2008, 28 : 139 - 149
  • [4] An agri-environmental assessment of trade liberalization
    Johansson, Robert C.
    Cooper, Joseph
    Peters, Mark
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 58 (01) : 37 - 48
  • [5] Selecting agri-environmental indicators to facilitate monitoring and assessment of EU agri-environmental measures effectiveness
    Zalidis, GC
    Tsiafouli, MA
    Takavakoglou, V
    Bilas, G
    Misopolinos, N
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 70 (04) : 315 - 321
  • [6] Agri-environmental evaluation of traditional and alternative corn production systems in Chiapas, Mexico
    Ernesto Aguilar-Jimenez, Carlos
    Tolon-Becerra, Alfredo
    Bolivar Lastra-Bravo, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS, 2011, 112 (02) : 71 - 86
  • [7] Comparative productivity of alternative cellulosic bioenergy cropping systems in the North Central USA
    Sanford, Gregg R.
    Oates, Lawrence G.
    Jasrotia, Poonam
    Thelen, Kurt D.
    Robertson, G. Philip
    Jackson, Randall D.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 216 : 344 - 355
  • [8] Assessing the impact of agri-environmental payments on green productivity in Germany
    Sidhoum, Amer Ait
    Mennig, Philipp
    Frick, Fabian
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 219
  • [9] Uptake of agri-environmental measures on organic and conventional farms in Switzerland
    Schader, Christian
    Pfiffner, Lukas
    Schlatter, Christian
    Stolze, Matthias
    AGRARFORSCHUNG, 2008, 15 (10): : 506 - 511
  • [10] Scale changes and model linking methods for integrated assessment of agri-environmental systems
    Ewert, Frank
    van Ittersum, Martin K.
    Heckelei, Thomas
    Therond, Olivier
    Bezlepkina, Irina
    Andersen, Erling
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 142 (1-2) : 6 - 17