Aortic valve replacement with sutureless prosthesis: better than root enlargement to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch?

被引:36
|
作者
Beckmann, Erik [1 ]
Martens, Andreas [1 ]
Alhadi, Firas [1 ]
Hoeffler, Klaus [1 ]
Umminger, Julia [1 ]
Kaufeld, Tim [1 ]
Sarikouch, Samir [1 ]
Koigeldiev, Nurbol [1 ]
Cebotari, Serghei [1 ]
Schmitto, Jan Dieter [1 ]
Haverich, Axel [1 ]
Shrestha, Malakh [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Cardiothorac Transplantat & Vasc Surg, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Aortic valve replacement; Patient-prosthesis mismatch; Aortic root enlargement; Sutureless valves; Sorin Perceval; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; ANNULUS;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivw041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus may result in patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). Aortic root enlargement (ARE) can reduce PPM, but leads to extended cardiac ischaemia times. Sutureless valves have the potential to prevent PPM while reducing cardiac ischaemia times. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2011, a total of 128 patients with a small aortic annulus underwent surgery for aortic valve stenosis at our centre. Thirty-six (17% male, n = 6) patients received conventional valve replacement with ARE and 92 (16% male, n = 18) subjects received sutureless valve implantation (Sorin Perceval). We conducted a comparative, retrospective study with follow-up. RESULTS: The sutureless group showed a significantly higher age (79 years) than the ARE patients (62 years, P < 0.001) and received significantly more concomitant cardiac procedures (33%, n = 30 vs 6%, n = 2, P = 0.001). The mean operation, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were significantly lower in sutureless patients (147 +/- 42, 67 +/- 26 and 35 +/- 13 min, respectively) than in ARE patients (181 +/- 41, 105 +/- 29 and 70 +/- 19 min, respectively, P < 0.001). The mean postoperative effective orifice area (EOA) indexed to the body surface area was 0.91 +/- 0.2 cm(2)/m(2) in ARE patients and 0.83 +/- 0.14 cm(2)/m(2) in sutureless patients (P = 0.040). The rate of patients with severe PPM was 6% (n = 2) in ARE patients and 11% (n = 8%) in sutureless patients (not significant, n.s.). The 30-day mortality rates were 2% (n = 2) in sutureless patients and 6% (n = 2) in ARE patients (n.s.). The 1- and 5-year survival rates of the sutureless group were 92 and 54% years, respectively, whereas the 1- and 5-year survival rates of the ARE group were 76% (n. s.). CONCLUSIONS: Although the sutureless valve patients received significantly more concomitant procedures, all operation-associated times were significantly shorter. Despite sutureless valve patients being older, the 30-day mortality and survival rates were comparable in the two groups. Since the indexed EOA was only slightly lower and the incidence of severe PPM was not significantly higher in the sutureless valve patients, we conclude that sutureless valve implantation is an alternative to conventional ARE to treat a small aortic annulus and avoid PPM, especially in geriatric patients who benefit from the quick implantation process.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 749
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Association between severe patient-prosthesis mismatch and prosthetic valve dysfunction following aortic valve replacement surgery with a biological prosthesis
    Mahia, M.
    Politi, T.
    Castro, F.
    Sciancalepore, A.
    Ronderos, R.
    Avegliano, G.
    Vranic, J. M.
    Camporrotondo, M.
    Piccinini, F.
    Navia, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 125 - 126
  • [42] Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement
    Bakhtiary, Farhad
    Schiemann, Mirko
    Dzemali, Omer
    Dogan, Selami
    Schaechinger, Volker
    Ackermann, Hans
    Moritz, Anton
    Kleine, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (07) : 790 - 796
  • [43] Aortic root enlargement versus stentless valve implantation for avoidance of patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with small aortic root: protocol for a systematic review
    Meneas, Christophe
    Voisine, Pierre
    Mestres, Carlos
    Sall, Fatouma
    Kabore, Remi
    N'guessan, Anon
    Yangni-Angate, Herve
    Mohammadi, Siamak
    Dagenais, Francois
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (08): : 1 - 4
  • [44] Patient-prosthesis mismatch: surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high risk patients with aortic stenosis
    Ghanta, Ravi K.
    Kron, Irving L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (10) : E1441 - E1443
  • [45] Effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on longterm survival with aortic valve replacement: Assessment to 15 years
    Jamieson, W.
    Pibarot, P.
    Dumesnil, J. G.
    Ye, J.
    Cheung, A.
    Germann, E.
    Chan, F.
    MacNab, J. S.
    Stanford, E. A.
    Bryson, L. A.
    Licthentstein, S. V.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 23 : 83C - 83C
  • [46] Impact of Left Ventricular Function on Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Chen, Kai
    James, Taylor Michiko
    Rothenberg, Mark
    Kapilla, Arvind
    Faber, Cristiano
    Nores, Marcos A.
    Stamou, Sotiris C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2019, 25 (08) : S41 - S41
  • [47] Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable? Appendix A. Conference discussion
    Redzepagic, S
    Garcia-Fuster
    Hazekamp, MG
    Deac, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 27 (03) : 449 - 449
  • [48] Patient-prosthesis mismatch after mitral valve replacement: Myth or reality?
    Totaro, Pasquale
    Argano, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 134 (03): : 697 - 701
  • [49] Patient-prosthesis mismatch after mitral valve replacement: Is it a fact or myth?
    Mattr, Rehab M.
    Abdelwahab, Amr A.
    Elnasr, Mohamed A.
    Wahby, Ehab
    Taha, Abdelhady
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (02): : 676 - 683
  • [50] Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch on Long-term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement
    Graser, Michaela
    Bleiziffer, Sabine
    Zittermann, Armin
    Mayr, Benedikt
    Sideris, Konstantinos
    Puluca, Nazan
    Krane, Markus
    Prinzing, Anatol
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 118 (05):