Aortic valve replacement with sutureless prosthesis: better than root enlargement to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch?

被引:36
|
作者
Beckmann, Erik [1 ]
Martens, Andreas [1 ]
Alhadi, Firas [1 ]
Hoeffler, Klaus [1 ]
Umminger, Julia [1 ]
Kaufeld, Tim [1 ]
Sarikouch, Samir [1 ]
Koigeldiev, Nurbol [1 ]
Cebotari, Serghei [1 ]
Schmitto, Jan Dieter [1 ]
Haverich, Axel [1 ]
Shrestha, Malakh [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Cardiothorac Transplantat & Vasc Surg, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Aortic valve replacement; Patient-prosthesis mismatch; Aortic root enlargement; Sutureless valves; Sorin Perceval; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; ANNULUS;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivw041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus may result in patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). Aortic root enlargement (ARE) can reduce PPM, but leads to extended cardiac ischaemia times. Sutureless valves have the potential to prevent PPM while reducing cardiac ischaemia times. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2011, a total of 128 patients with a small aortic annulus underwent surgery for aortic valve stenosis at our centre. Thirty-six (17% male, n = 6) patients received conventional valve replacement with ARE and 92 (16% male, n = 18) subjects received sutureless valve implantation (Sorin Perceval). We conducted a comparative, retrospective study with follow-up. RESULTS: The sutureless group showed a significantly higher age (79 years) than the ARE patients (62 years, P < 0.001) and received significantly more concomitant cardiac procedures (33%, n = 30 vs 6%, n = 2, P = 0.001). The mean operation, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were significantly lower in sutureless patients (147 +/- 42, 67 +/- 26 and 35 +/- 13 min, respectively) than in ARE patients (181 +/- 41, 105 +/- 29 and 70 +/- 19 min, respectively, P < 0.001). The mean postoperative effective orifice area (EOA) indexed to the body surface area was 0.91 +/- 0.2 cm(2)/m(2) in ARE patients and 0.83 +/- 0.14 cm(2)/m(2) in sutureless patients (P = 0.040). The rate of patients with severe PPM was 6% (n = 2) in ARE patients and 11% (n = 8%) in sutureless patients (not significant, n.s.). The 30-day mortality rates were 2% (n = 2) in sutureless patients and 6% (n = 2) in ARE patients (n.s.). The 1- and 5-year survival rates of the sutureless group were 92 and 54% years, respectively, whereas the 1- and 5-year survival rates of the ARE group were 76% (n. s.). CONCLUSIONS: Although the sutureless valve patients received significantly more concomitant procedures, all operation-associated times were significantly shorter. Despite sutureless valve patients being older, the 30-day mortality and survival rates were comparable in the two groups. Since the indexed EOA was only slightly lower and the incidence of severe PPM was not significantly higher in the sutureless valve patients, we conclude that sutureless valve implantation is an alternative to conventional ARE to treat a small aortic annulus and avoid PPM, especially in geriatric patients who benefit from the quick implantation process.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 749
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors and outcomes of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Stamou, Sotiris C.
    Chen, Kai
    James, Taylor M.
    Rothenberg, Mark
    Kapila, Arvind
    Faber, Cristiano
    Nores, Marcos A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (02) : 360 - 366
  • [22] Can Perceval sutureless valve reduce the rate of patient-prosthesis mismatch?
    Belluschi, Igor
    Moriggia, Stefano
    Giacomini, Andrea
    Del Forno, Benedetto
    Di Sanzo, Stefania
    Blasio, Andrea
    Scafuri, Antonio
    Alfieri, Ottavio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (06) : 1093 - 1099
  • [23] Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Aortic Valve Intervention Another Win for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Prendergast, Bernard D.
    McConkey, Hannah Z. R.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (08) : 781 - 783
  • [24] Patient-prosthesis mismatch after transapical aortic valve implantation
    Kukucka, Marian
    Pasic, Miralem
    Dreysse, Stephan
    Buz, Semih
    Drews, Thorsten
    Mladenow, Alexander
    Habazettl, Helmut
    Kuppe, Hermann
    Unbehaun, Axel
    Hetzer, Roland
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 1 (02) : 172 - 175
  • [25] Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch can impact on mortality after aortic valve replacement
    Dumesnil, J. G.
    Magne, J.
    Girerd, N.
    HEART, 2009, 95 (07) : 592 - 592
  • [26] Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis of the PARTNER Trials
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Abbas, Amr E.
    Ternacle, Julien
    Hahn, Rebecca T.
    Makkar, Raj
    Kodali, Susheel K.
    George, Isaac
    Kapadia, Samir
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Szeto, Wilson Y.
    Herrmann, Howard C.
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    Blanke, Philipp
    Webb, John
    Jaber, Wael A.
    Russo, Mark
    Malaisrie, S. Chris
    Yadav, Pradeep
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Khalique, Omar K.
    Weissman, Neil J.
    Douglas, Pamela
    Bax, Jeroen
    Dahou, Abdellaziz
    Xu, Ke
    Bapat, Vinayak
    Alu, Maria C.
    Leon, Martin B.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 117 (06): : 1164 - 1171
  • [27] Patient-prosthesis mismatch following mechanical mitral valve replacement
    Chan, Vincent
    Lam, Buu-Khanh
    Mesana, Thierry
    Ruel, Marc
    Hendry, Paul
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 314A - 314A
  • [28] Suture Techniques and Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch for Aortic Valve Surgery
    Iscan, Sahin
    Eygi, Bortecin
    Yesilkaya, Nihan
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (05): : 1781 - 1781
  • [29] Aortic Valve Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Obesity: Is it Time to Reconsider?
    Gupta, Amit K.
    Strom, Joel A.
    CIRCULATION, 2016, 134
  • [30] Patient-prosthesis mismatch increases the mean platelet volume in patients with aortic valve replacement
    Bayram, Huseyin
    Hidiroglu, Mete
    Cetin, Levent
    Cicek, Omer Faruk
    Kucuker, Aslihan
    Uguz, Emrah
    Erdogan, Kemal Esref
    Sener, Erol
    SURGERY TODAY, 2015, 45 (05) : 559 - 563