GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF

被引:2
|
作者
Pirog, Magdalena [1 ]
Kacalska-Janssen, Olga [1 ]
Jach, Robert [1 ]
Wyroba, Jakub [1 ]
Chrostowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Zabczyk, Michal [2 ,3 ]
Natorska, Joanna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Gynecol Endocrinol Dept, Ul Kopernika 23, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Inst Cardiol, Krakow, Poland
[3] John Paul 2 Hosp, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Fibrin clot; Fibrinolysis; Thrombin generation; Ovarian stimulation; Infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; INFERTILE WOMEN; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FIBRINOLYSIS; HEMOSTASIS; SYSTEM; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s43032-022-01026-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been reported in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) supporting a potential hypercoagulable condition related to this treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the changes in fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation induced by two different COH protocols: long with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant). Primary outcomes included determination of plasma fibrin clot properties, including clot permeability (K-s) and efficiency of fibrinolysis using clot lysis time (CLT), along with thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and fibrinolysis inhibitor levels. One hundred twenty-nine infertile women were included in the final analysis. The GnRH-ant protocol resulted in increased ETP (+9.8%) and reduced K-s (-2.4%). Conversely, COH with the GnRH-a protocol reduced thrombin generation by decreasing both ETP (-6.6%) and F1 + 2 (-30.8%) together with favorably altered fibrin clot properties represented by increased K-s (+21.7%) and reduced CLT (-13.8%) as well as decreased PAI-1 levels (by 2.5 times). The GnRH-ant compared to the GnRH-a protocol increased PAI-1 levels (+ 77.3%), thrombin generation (9.3% higher ETP), and K-s (+13.7%). In the GnRH-a group, post-COH K-s was 14.3% higher (K-s >= 7.92 x 10(-9) cm(2)) in women with positive vs. negative pregnancy outcomes. Our results show that the GnRH-ant protocol enhanced thrombin generation and slightly decreased fibrin clot density. COH with the GnRH-a reduced thrombin generation and improved fibrin clot features.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3531
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Wang, Ningling
    Zhu, Qianqian
    Ma, Meng
    Liang, Zhou
    Tao, Yu
    Wang, Yun
    Kuang, Yanping
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [42] DOES EXTENDING CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPER-STIMULATION DURING A GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN VITRO FERTILIZATION CYCLE AFFECT OOCYTE QUALITY?
    Chang, Sydney
    Nazem, Taraneh Gharib
    Hernandez-Nieto, Carlos
    Gounko, Dmitry
    McAvey, Beth
    Stein, Daniel E.
    Copperman, Alan B.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (03) : E217 - E217
  • [43] Does the Length of Ovarian Stimulation or Duration of GnRH Antagonist Use Affect Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles Using a GnRH Antagonist?
    Royster, G. D., IV
    Robinson, R. D.
    Propst, A. M.
    Retzloff, M. G.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 : S19 - S19
  • [44] GnRH-Agonist Ovulation Trigger in Patients Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF with Stop GnRH-Agonist Combined with Multidose GnRH-Antagonist Protocol
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Nahum, Ravit
    Zohav, Efraim
    Liberty, Gad
    Anteby, Eyal Y.
    Meltcer, Simion
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2021, 86 (05) : 427 - 431
  • [45] Comparison of the Effects and Safety of Mild Ovarian Stimulation and Conventional Ovarian Stimulation with A Long GnRH Agonist Protocol on IVF Outcomes
    Rong-rong TAN
    Dan-hua PU
    Jia-yin LIU
    Jie WU
    Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 2013, (03) : 159 - 172
  • [46] ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation
    Bercaire, Ludmila
    Nogueira, Sara M. B.
    Lima, Priscila C. M.
    Alves, Vanessa R.
    Donadio, Nilka
    Dzik, Artur
    Cavagna, Mario
    Fanchin, Renato
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2018, 22 (01): : 52 - 55
  • [47] RELATION BETWEEN THE TIME OF CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION IN PROGESTIN AND GnRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOLS AND THE OUTCOMES OF IVF-A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Ramos Seixas, N.
    Baldin, C.
    Feliciano Orlandini, M.
    Ingold, C.
    Parete Barbosa, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [48] GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial
    Cheung, LP
    Lam, PM
    Lok, IH
    Chiu, TTY
    Yeung, SY
    Tjer, CC
    Haines, CJ
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) : 616 - 621
  • [49] Influence of the duration of GnRH-antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol on IVF outcomes in patients with anovulation, endometriosis, premature ovarian failure (POF) and idiopathic infertility
    Gomez, J.
    Martinez-Sanchis, J. V.
    Iniesta Miron, I.
    Fernandez-Colom, P. J.
    Rubio Rubio, J. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 52 - 52
  • [50] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in IVF/ICSI compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study
    Huang, Pinxiu
    Tang, Minling
    Qin, Aiping
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 48 (02) : 99 - 102