GnRH Antagonist Protocol Enhances Coagulation During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF

被引:2
|
作者
Pirog, Magdalena [1 ]
Kacalska-Janssen, Olga [1 ]
Jach, Robert [1 ]
Wyroba, Jakub [1 ]
Chrostowski, Bartosz [1 ]
Zabczyk, Michal [2 ,3 ]
Natorska, Joanna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Gynecol Endocrinol Dept, Ul Kopernika 23, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Inst Cardiol, Krakow, Poland
[3] John Paul 2 Hosp, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Fibrin clot; Fibrinolysis; Thrombin generation; Ovarian stimulation; Infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; INFERTILE WOMEN; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FIBRINOLYSIS; HEMOSTASIS; SYSTEM; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s43032-022-01026-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been reported in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) supporting a potential hypercoagulable condition related to this treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the changes in fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation induced by two different COH protocols: long with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant). Primary outcomes included determination of plasma fibrin clot properties, including clot permeability (K-s) and efficiency of fibrinolysis using clot lysis time (CLT), along with thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1 + 2) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and fibrinolysis inhibitor levels. One hundred twenty-nine infertile women were included in the final analysis. The GnRH-ant protocol resulted in increased ETP (+9.8%) and reduced K-s (-2.4%). Conversely, COH with the GnRH-a protocol reduced thrombin generation by decreasing both ETP (-6.6%) and F1 + 2 (-30.8%) together with favorably altered fibrin clot properties represented by increased K-s (+21.7%) and reduced CLT (-13.8%) as well as decreased PAI-1 levels (by 2.5 times). The GnRH-ant compared to the GnRH-a protocol increased PAI-1 levels (+ 77.3%), thrombin generation (9.3% higher ETP), and K-s (+13.7%). In the GnRH-a group, post-COH K-s was 14.3% higher (K-s >= 7.92 x 10(-9) cm(2)) in women with positive vs. negative pregnancy outcomes. Our results show that the GnRH-ant protocol enhanced thrombin generation and slightly decreased fibrin clot density. COH with the GnRH-a reduced thrombin generation and improved fibrin clot features.
引用
收藏
页码:3521 / 3531
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ovarian response prediction in controlled ovarian stimulation with 150 μg corifollitropin alfa in a GnRH-antagonist protocol
    Lerman, T.
    Depenbusch, M.
    Kamischke, A.
    Koenig, I.
    Macek, M.
    Schultze-Mosgau, A.
    Schwennicke, A.
    Segerer, S.
    von Otte, S.
    Griesinger, G.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 339 - 339
  • [22] LONG-ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL; LUTEAL ADMINISTRATION OF A SINGLE DOSE OF DEGARELIX (LONG-ACTING GNRH-ANTAGONIST) FOR CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION. A NEW PROTOCOL FOR IVF.
    Papanikolaou, E.
    Timotheou, E.
    Tatsi, P.
    Chartomatsidou, T.
    Najdecki, R.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E336 - E337
  • [23] GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF
    Tarlatzis, B. C.
    Fauser, B. C.
    Kolibianakis, E. M.
    Diedrich, K.
    Devroey, P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2006, 12 (04) : 333 - 340
  • [24] FREQUENCY OF LOW SERUM LH LEVEL DURING OVARIAN STIMULATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS IN IVF/ICSI CYCLES WITH A GNRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL
    Chen, S.
    Chiang, Y.
    Jou, G.
    Chang, C.
    Chen, C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E116 - E117
  • [25] A short ovarian stimulation does not negatively impact IVF pregnancy rates when utilizing a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Eaton, JL
    Zimon, A
    Von Wald, T
    Goldman, M
    Alper, MM
    Reindollar, RH
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S251 - S252
  • [26] Improving the patient's experience of IVF/ICSI: a proposal for an ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist co-treatment
    Devroey, Paul
    Aboulghar, Mohamed
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan
    Griesinger, Georg
    Humaidan, Peter
    Kolibianakis, Efstratios
    Ledger, William
    Tomas, Candido
    Fauser, Bart C. J. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (04) : 764 - 774
  • [27] A prospective randomised study comparing a GnRH-antagonist versus a GnRH-agonist short protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients referred for IVF
    Gordts, S.
    Van Turnhout, C.
    Campo, R.
    Puttemans, P.
    Valkenburg, M.
    Gordts, S.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2012, 4 (02): : 82 - 87
  • [28] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY COMPARING A GNRH-ANTAGONIST VERSUS A GNRH-AGONIST SHORT PROTOCOL FOR OVARIAN STIMULATION IN PATIENTS REFERRED FOR IVF
    Gordts, S.
    Puttemans, P.
    Campo, R.
    Valkenburg, M.
    Gordts, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S176 - S176
  • [29] Comparison of GnRH Agonist, GnRH Antagonist, and GnRH Antagonist Mild Protocol of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in Good Prognosis Patients
    Stimpfel, Martin
    Vrtacnik-Bokal, Eda
    Pozlep, Barbara
    Virant-Klun, Irma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [30] COMPARISON OF FSH AND FSH-HMG REGIMEN IN GnRH ANTAGONIST USING CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION PROTOCOL
    Fujiwara, T.
    Tabata, C.
    Tsutsumi, O.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S278 - S278