Adaptation and evaluation of the Chinese hospital nursing department disaster preparedness scale: a cross-sectional scale development study

被引:5
|
作者
Shi, Lan [1 ]
Li, Mingxuan [2 ]
Xu, Xiaofeng [3 ]
Wang, Zhengdong [4 ]
Li, Sijian [5 ]
Feng, Xianqiong [6 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Prov Hosp, Med Intens Care Unit, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Emergency Dept, West China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Operating Room, West China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Neonatol Dept, West China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Nursing, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
accident & emergency medicine; public health; organisation of health services;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043636
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study was to adapt the Chinese version of Hospital Nursing Department Disaster Preparedness Scale (HNDDPS) and evaluate the psychometric properties among hospital nurses in China. Two specific objectives were (1) to adapt the HNDDPS from Sadiq's Organisational Disaster Preparedness Scale (SODPS) to fit the context of Chinese hospital nursing system and (2) to establish its validity and reliability. Design Instrument design study. Settings and participants 2657 nurses belonging to 50 nursing organisations of tertiary hospitals spread across seven administrative regions of China. Methods We adapted the Chinese version of HNDDPS through translation of the SODPS, back translation and cultural adaptation. Subsequently, we evaluated the validity of the scale through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), each performed on half of the original sample. We also evaluated the internal consistency reliability of the scale. Results The Chinese version of HNDDPS comprised five dimensions, with 72 items. Exploratory factor analysis yielded five factors explaining 61% of the items' variance. CFA confirmed five dimensions of the scale and produced appropriate Goodness of Fit Indexes. Cronbach's alpha-coefficient was 0.930 for the total scale and ranged from 0.908 to 0.964 for the five dimensions of the scale. Conclusion HNDDPS demonstrates good internal consistency and construct validity. It is a promising, valid and reliable tool for nurses and nursing managers to evaluate hospital nursing department disaster preparedness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Emergency Department Staff to Preparedness of Disaster and Emergency in Saudi Arabia: Multicenter Cross-sectional Study
    Alhamaid, Yousef A.
    Aljawi, Huda
    Alsughayyir, Ghala
    Alshammari, Meshal H.
    Albatshan, Reem S.
    Alabbad, Fatemah E.
    Aljohani, Ruba M.
    Almahfoodh, Noor H.
    Alotaibi, Abdulelah
    Almulhim, Nasser A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 28 (11) : 1023 - 1027
  • [32] Development and validation of pharmaceutical care barriers scale in Chinese hospitals: a cross-sectional survey
    Chen, Liangjiang
    Yang, Nan
    Huang, Yuankai
    Xi, Xiaoyu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [33] Undergraduate nursing students' perceptions about disaster preparedness and response in Istanbul, Turkey, and Miyazaki, Japan: A cross-sectional study
    Oztekin, Seher Deniz
    Larson, Eric Edwin
    Yuksel, Serpil
    Altun Ugras, Gulay
    JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE, 2015, 12 (02) : 145 - 153
  • [34] Psychometric properties of the Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale: A multicentre cross-sectional study
    Romero-Garcia, Marta
    Alcala-Jimenez, Isidro
    Martinez-Momblan, Maria Antonia
    de la Cueva-Ariza, Laura
    Cuzco, Cecilia
    Alonso, Sergio
    Benito-Aracil, Llucia
    Delgado-Hito, Pilar
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 36 (04) : 550 - 557
  • [35] Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
    A. Parseliunas
    S. Paskauskas
    V. Simatoniene
    J. Vaitekunas
    D. Venskutonis
    Hernia, 2022, 26 : 735 - 744
  • [36] Adaptation and validation of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study
    Parseliunas, A.
    Paskauskas, S.
    Simatoniene, V.
    Vaitekunas, J.
    Venskutonis, D.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (03) : 735 - 744
  • [37] Emergency preparedness capacity of a university hospital in Ghana: a cross-sectional study
    Boateng-Osei, Estella Antoinette
    Osei, Isaac
    Diji, Abigail Kusi-Amponsah
    Pambour, Bernice Agyeman
    Wireko-Gyebi, Rejoice
    Okyere, Portia
    Lomotey, Alberta Yemotsoo
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (03) : 152 - 156
  • [38] Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Nursing Student Contributions to Clinical Settings scale and analysis of factors influencing nurses' perceptions of nursing students' contributions: a cross-sectional study
    Xu, Kaiyan
    Tong, Huijuan
    Zhang, Chunyan
    Qiu, Feng
    Liu, Yaoyao
    BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [39] Mental health nurses' disaster nursing competencies: A cross-sectional study
    Jang, Sun Joo
    Kim, Heejeong
    Lee, Haeyoung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2022, 31 (01) : 142 - 152
  • [40] Psychometric evaluation of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale in Chinese adults with rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study
    Tsai, Tzung-Yi
    Lu, Ming-Chi
    Livneh, Hanoch
    Lin, Miao-Chiu
    Lai, Ning-Seng
    Guo, How-Ran
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):