The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:59
|
作者
Chaudhry, Mohammad [1 ,4 ]
McGinty, Katrina A. [4 ]
Mervak, Benjamin [4 ]
Lerebours, Reginald [6 ]
Li, Cai [6 ]
Shropshire, Erin [1 ]
Ronald, James [1 ]
Commander, Leah [5 ]
Hertel, Johann [5 ]
Luo, Sheng [6 ]
Bashir, Mustafa R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Burke, Lauren M. B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 200 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, 200 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Magnet Dev, 200 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
关键词
LOCOREGIONAL THERAPIES; HCC; CT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019191581
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is used to assess presumed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after local-regional therapy, but its performance has not been extensively assessed. Purpose: To assess the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 TRA in the evaluation of HCC after ablation. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent ablation therapy for presumed HCC followed by liver transplantation between January 2011 and December 2015 at a single tertiary care center were identified. Lesions were categorized as completely (100%) or incompletely (<= 99%) necrotic based on transplant histology. Three radiologists assessed pre- and post-treatment MRI findings using LI-RADS version 2018 and the TRA, respectively. Interreader agreement was assessed by using the Fleiss k test. Performance characteristics for predicting necrosis category based on LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) category(viable or nonviable) were calculated by using generalized mixed-effects models to account for clustering by subject. Results: A total of 36 patients (mean age, 58 years +/- 5 [standard deviation]; 32 men) with 53 lesions was included. Interreader agreement for pretreatment LI-RADS category was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15, 0.67; P,.01) and was lower than the interreader agreement for TRA category (kappa = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.84; P<.01). After accounting for clustering by subject,sensitivity of tumor necrosis across readers ranged from 40% to 77%, and specificity ranged from 85% to 97% when LR-TR equivocal assessments were treated as nonviable. When LR-TR equivocal assessments were treated as viable, sensitivity of tumor necrosis across readers ranged from 81% to 87%, and specificity ranged from 81% to 85% across readers. Six (11%) of 53 treated lesions were LR-TR equivocal by consensus, with most (five of six) incompletely necrotic at histopathology. Conclusion: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm can be used to predict viable or nonviable hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation. Most ablated lesions rated as treatment response equivocal were incompletely necrotic at histopathology. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 326
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of CT and MR Imaging in Assessment of Loco-regional Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma using LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm (version 2018)
    Zarad, Carmen Ali
    Elagawy, Waleed
    Hasan, Basma Badreldin
    Abd-Elsalam, Sherief
    Shanab, Waleed Abo S.
    CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (03) : 260 - 270
  • [2] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Song, Christopher
    Gavlin, Alexander
    Roudenko, Alexandra
    Lu, Lina
    Askin, Gulce
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1085 - 1092
  • [3] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Evaluation of Pediatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Khanna, Geetika
    Chavhan, Govind B.
    Schooler, Gary R.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Alazraki, Adina L.
    Squires, Judy H.
    Salter, Amber
    Podberesky, Daniel J.
    Towbin, Alexander J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (01) : 190 - 199
  • [4] LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm: The Evidence Is Accumulating
    Do, Richard K.
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (02) : 327 - 328
  • [5] Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI
    Patel, Richa
    Aslam, Anum
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Mervak, Benjamin
    Mubarak, Eman
    Higgins, Lily
    Lala, Kayli
    Conner, Jack F.
    Khaykin, Valerie
    Bashir, Mustafa
    Do, Richard Kinh Gian
    Burke, Lauren M. B.
    Smith, Elainea N.
    Kim, Charles Y.
    Shampain, Kimberly L.
    Owen, Dawn
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (06) : 1641 - 1654
  • [6] LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium enhanced MRI
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (03) : 655 - 663
  • [7] Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Kyoung Bun
    Kim, Haeryoung
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (02) : 336 - 345
  • [8] Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm
    Ania Kielar
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Sara Lewis
    Vahid Yaghmai
    Frank H. Miller
    Hooman Yarmohammadi
    Charles Kim
    Victoria Chernyak
    Takeshi Yokoo
    Jeffrey Meyer
    Isabel Newton
    Richard K. Do
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 218 - 230
  • [9] Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm
    Kielar, Ania
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Lewis, Sara
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Miller, Frank H.
    Yarmohammadi, Hooman
    Kim, Charles
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Newton, Isabel
    Do, Richard K.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 218 - 230
  • [10] LI-RADS Version 2018 Ancillary Features at MRI
    Cerny, Milena
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Olivie, Damien
    Billiard, Jean-Sebastien
    Murphy-Lavallee, Jessica
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Bourque, Laurence
    Hooker, Jonathan C.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Tang, An
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2018, 38 (07) : 1973 - 2001