The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:59
|
作者
Chaudhry, Mohammad [1 ,4 ]
McGinty, Katrina A. [4 ]
Mervak, Benjamin [4 ]
Lerebours, Reginald [6 ]
Li, Cai [6 ]
Shropshire, Erin [1 ]
Ronald, James [1 ]
Commander, Leah [5 ]
Hertel, Johann [5 ]
Luo, Sheng [6 ]
Bashir, Mustafa R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Burke, Lauren M. B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 200 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, 200 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Magnet Dev, 200 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
关键词
LOCOREGIONAL THERAPIES; HCC; CT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019191581
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is used to assess presumed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after local-regional therapy, but its performance has not been extensively assessed. Purpose: To assess the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 TRA in the evaluation of HCC after ablation. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent ablation therapy for presumed HCC followed by liver transplantation between January 2011 and December 2015 at a single tertiary care center were identified. Lesions were categorized as completely (100%) or incompletely (<= 99%) necrotic based on transplant histology. Three radiologists assessed pre- and post-treatment MRI findings using LI-RADS version 2018 and the TRA, respectively. Interreader agreement was assessed by using the Fleiss k test. Performance characteristics for predicting necrosis category based on LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) category(viable or nonviable) were calculated by using generalized mixed-effects models to account for clustering by subject. Results: A total of 36 patients (mean age, 58 years +/- 5 [standard deviation]; 32 men) with 53 lesions was included. Interreader agreement for pretreatment LI-RADS category was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15, 0.67; P,.01) and was lower than the interreader agreement for TRA category (kappa = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.84; P<.01). After accounting for clustering by subject,sensitivity of tumor necrosis across readers ranged from 40% to 77%, and specificity ranged from 85% to 97% when LR-TR equivocal assessments were treated as nonviable. When LR-TR equivocal assessments were treated as viable, sensitivity of tumor necrosis across readers ranged from 81% to 87%, and specificity ranged from 81% to 85% across readers. Six (11%) of 53 treated lesions were LR-TR equivocal by consensus, with most (five of six) incompletely necrotic at histopathology. Conclusion: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm can be used to predict viable or nonviable hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation. Most ablated lesions rated as treatment response equivocal were incompletely necrotic at histopathology. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 326
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Leyao
    Feng, Bing
    Liang, Meng
    Li, Dengfeng
    Cong, Rong
    Chen, Zhaowei
    Wang, Sicong
    Ma, Xiaohong
    Zhao, Xinming
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (06) : 1918 - 1928
  • [42] Up-to-Date Role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, 2021, 8 : 513 - 527
  • [43] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the 2017 and 2018 versions of LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI
    Ko, A.
    Park, H. J.
    Lee, E. S.
    Park, S. B.
    Kim, Y. K.
    Choi, S-Y
    Ahn, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (04) : 319.e1 - 319.e9
  • [44] LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy
    Shropshire, Erin L.
    Chaudhry, Mohammad
    Miller, Chad M.
    Allen, Brian C.
    Bozdogan, Erol
    Cardona, Diana M.
    King, Lindsay Y.
    Janas, Gemini L.
    Do, Richard K.
    Kim, Charles Y.
    Ronald, James
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (01) : 226 - 234
  • [45] Man or machine? Prospective comparison of the version 2018 EASL, LI-RADS criteria and a radiomics model to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Liu, Xijiao
    Chen, Jie
    Wei, Yi
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Cao, Likun
    Wu, Yuanan
    Duan, Ting
    Li, Xin
    Ma, Ling
    Song, Bin
    CANCER IMAGING, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [46] Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10–19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?
    Sidong Xie
    Yao Zhang
    Jingbiao Chen
    Ting Jiang
    Weimin Liu
    Dailin Rong
    Lin Sun
    Linqi Zhang
    Bingjun He
    Jin Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 596 - 607
  • [47] Man or machine? Prospective comparison of the version 2018 EASL, LI-RADS criteria and a radiomics model to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hanyu Jiang
    Xijiao Liu
    Jie Chen
    Yi Wei
    Jeong Min Lee
    Likun Cao
    Yuanan Wu
    Ting Duan
    Xin Li
    Ling Ma
    Bin Song
    Cancer Imaging, 19
  • [48] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Do, Richard K.
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Singal, Amit G.
    Tang, An
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 816 - 830
  • [49] New Progress toward Validation of LI-RADS Version 2018
    Furlan, Alessandro
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (01) : 80 - 81
  • [50] Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study
    Rong, Dailin
    He, Bingjun
    Tang, Wenjie
    Xie, Sidong
    Kuang, Sichi
    Grazioli, Luigi
    Hussain, Shahid M.
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Jin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 687 - 698