Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: A review with emphasis on cost estimation

被引:576
|
作者
Mahamuni, Naresh N. [1 ]
Adewuyi, Yusuf G. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina Agr & Tech State Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Greensboro, NC 27411 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cost estimation; AOP; Ultrasound; Sonochemistry; Waste water treatment; SONOCHEMICAL DEGRADATION; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; PHENOL; OZONE; DECOMPOSITION; POLLUTANTS; DISINFECTION; TECHNOLOGIES; ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Two things are needed for any technology to be suitable for use in the industry, viz. 1. Technical feasibility and 2. Economical feasibility. The use of ultrasound for waste water treatment has been shown to be technically feasible by numerous reports in the literature over the years. But there are hardly any exhaustive reports which address the issue of economical feasibility of the use of ultrasound for waste water treatment on industrial scale. Hence an attempt was made to estimate the cost for the waste water treatment using ultrasound. The costs have been calculated for 1000 L/min capacity treatment plant. The costs were calculated based upon the rate constants for pollutant degradation. The pollutants considered were phenol, trichloroethylene (ICE) and reactive azo dyes. Time required for ninety percent degradation of pollutant was taken as the residence time. The amount of energy required to achieve the target degradation was calculated from the energy density (watt/ml) used in the treatability study. The cost of treatment was calculated by considering capital cost and operating cost involved for the waste water treatment. Quotations were invited from vendors to ascertain the capital cost of equipments involved and operating costs were calculated based on annual energy usage. The cost was expressed in dollars per 1000 gallons of waste water treated. These treatment costs were compared with other established Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) technologies. The cost of waste water treatment for phenol was in the range of $89 per 1000 gallons for UV/US/O-3 to $15,536 per 1000 gallons for US alone. These costs for ICE were in the range of $25 per 1000 gallons to $91 for US + UV treatment and US alone, respectively. The cost of waste water treatment for reactive azo dyes was in the range of $65 per 1000 gallon for US + UV + H2O2 to $14,203 per 1000 gallon for US alone. This study should help in quantifying the economics of waste water treatment using ultrasound on industrial scale. We strongly believe that this study will immensely help the researchers working in the area of applications of ultrasound for waste water treatment in terms of where the technology stands today as compared to other available commercial AOP technologies. This will also help them think for different ways to improve the efficiency of using ultrasound or search for other ways of generating cavitation which may be more efficient and help reduce the cost of treatment in future. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 1003
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment - A critical review
    Miklos, David B.
    Remy, Christian
    Jekel, Martin
    Linden, Karl G.
    Drewes, Joerg E.
    Huebner, Uwe
    WATER RESEARCH, 2018, 139 : 118 - 131
  • [42] Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based wastewater treatment - unexpected nitration side reactions - a serious environmental issue: A review
    Rayaroth, Manoj P.
    Aravindakumar, Charuvila T.
    Shah, Noor S.
    Boczkaj, Grzegorz
    Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 430
  • [43] Synergistic effects of hybrid advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on hydrodynamic cavitation phenomenon - A review
    Fedorov, Kirill
    Dinesh, Kumaravel
    Sun, Xun
    Soltani, Reza Darvishi Cheshmeh
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Sonawane, Shirish
    Boczkaj, Grzegorz
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 432
  • [44] ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES FOR WATER PURIFICATION: REVIEW
    Albarran, Guadalupe
    Mendoza, Edith
    AVANCES EN CIENCIAS E INGENIERIA, 2022, 13 (02): : 21 - 41
  • [45] Triggering nanoconfinement effect in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for boosted degradation of organic contaminants: A review
    Li, Junsuo
    Wang, Yongshuo
    Wang, Ziqian
    Ding, Dahu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 503
  • [46] The application of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) to treat unconventional water for fit-for-purpose reuse
    Gao, Jiong
    Qin, Tian
    Waclawek, Stanislaw
    Duan, Xiaodi
    Huang, Ying
    Liu, Haizhou
    Dionysiou, Dionysios
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 42
  • [47] ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES AGAINST PHENOLIC-COMPOUNDS IN WASTE-WATER TREATMENT
    PREIS, S
    KAMENEV, S
    KALLAS, J
    MUNTER, R
    OZONE-SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 1995, 17 (04) : 399 - 418
  • [48] Novel Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) as Lignocellulosic Biomass Pretreatment Approaches and Their Sustainability Assessment: A Review
    Toghiani, Javad
    Malekzadeh, Sajjad
    Jamali, Neda
    Afsham, Neda
    Fallah, Narges
    Mahboubi, Amir
    Nasernejad, Bahram
    Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
    Oladzad, Sepideh
    CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2024, 10 (02) : 207 - 246
  • [49] Activated persulfate and peroxymonosulfate based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for antibiotics degradation-A review
    Honarmandrad, Zhila
    Sun, Xun
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Naushad, M.
    Boczkaj, Grzegorz
    WATER RESOURCES AND INDUSTRY, 2023, 29
  • [50] Review on effect of different type of dyes on advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for textile color removal
    Ismail, Guntur Adisurya
    Sakai, Hiroshi
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 291