Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: A review with emphasis on cost estimation

被引:576
|
作者
Mahamuni, Naresh N. [1 ]
Adewuyi, Yusuf G. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina Agr & Tech State Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Greensboro, NC 27411 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cost estimation; AOP; Ultrasound; Sonochemistry; Waste water treatment; SONOCHEMICAL DEGRADATION; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; PHENOL; OZONE; DECOMPOSITION; POLLUTANTS; DISINFECTION; TECHNOLOGIES; ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Two things are needed for any technology to be suitable for use in the industry, viz. 1. Technical feasibility and 2. Economical feasibility. The use of ultrasound for waste water treatment has been shown to be technically feasible by numerous reports in the literature over the years. But there are hardly any exhaustive reports which address the issue of economical feasibility of the use of ultrasound for waste water treatment on industrial scale. Hence an attempt was made to estimate the cost for the waste water treatment using ultrasound. The costs have been calculated for 1000 L/min capacity treatment plant. The costs were calculated based upon the rate constants for pollutant degradation. The pollutants considered were phenol, trichloroethylene (ICE) and reactive azo dyes. Time required for ninety percent degradation of pollutant was taken as the residence time. The amount of energy required to achieve the target degradation was calculated from the energy density (watt/ml) used in the treatability study. The cost of treatment was calculated by considering capital cost and operating cost involved for the waste water treatment. Quotations were invited from vendors to ascertain the capital cost of equipments involved and operating costs were calculated based on annual energy usage. The cost was expressed in dollars per 1000 gallons of waste water treated. These treatment costs were compared with other established Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) technologies. The cost of waste water treatment for phenol was in the range of $89 per 1000 gallons for UV/US/O-3 to $15,536 per 1000 gallons for US alone. These costs for ICE were in the range of $25 per 1000 gallons to $91 for US + UV treatment and US alone, respectively. The cost of waste water treatment for reactive azo dyes was in the range of $65 per 1000 gallon for US + UV + H2O2 to $14,203 per 1000 gallon for US alone. This study should help in quantifying the economics of waste water treatment using ultrasound on industrial scale. We strongly believe that this study will immensely help the researchers working in the area of applications of ultrasound for waste water treatment in terms of where the technology stands today as compared to other available commercial AOP technologies. This will also help them think for different ways to improve the efficiency of using ultrasound or search for other ways of generating cavitation which may be more efficient and help reduce the cost of treatment in future. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 1003
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Generation of oxidative radicals by advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in wastewater treatment: a mechanistic, environmental and economic review
    Feijoo, Sara
    Yu, Xiaobin
    Kamali, Mohammadreza
    Appels, Lise
    Dewil, Raf
    REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 22 (01) : 205 - 248
  • [22] Recent trends in applications of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in bioenergy production: Review
    M'Arimi, M. M.
    Mecha, C. A.
    Kiprop, A. K.
    Ramkat, R.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 121 (121):
  • [23] A comprehensive review on reactive oxygen species (ROS) in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs)
    Dong, Chencheng
    Fang, Wenzhang
    Yi, Qiuying
    Zhang, Jinlong
    Chemosphere, 2022, 308
  • [24] A comprehensive review on reactive oxygen species (ROS) in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs)
    Dong, Chencheng
    Fang, Wenzhang
    Yi, Qiuying
    Zhang, Jinlong
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 308
  • [25] Cost estimation and economic evaluations of advanced oxidation processes for emerging water pollutants
    Adewuyi, Yusuf
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [26] Treatment of Landfill Leachate via Advanced Oxidation Process (AOPs) - A Review
    Roudi, Anita Maslahati
    Akhlaghi, Ebrahim
    Chelliapan, Shreeshivadasan
    Kaboli, Ahmadreza
    Roudi, Amin Maslahati
    Aslani, Hasan
    Selvam, Sivathass Bannir
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 6 (04): : 260 - 271
  • [27] Review on integrated advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment
    Dhamorikar, Rushikesh S.
    Lade, Vikesh G.
    V. Kewalramani, Pratik
    Bindwal, Ankush B.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2024, 138 : 104 - 122
  • [28] Hydroxylamine driven advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: A review
    Duan, Jiebin
    Pang, Su-yan
    Wang, Zhen
    Zhou, Yang
    Gao, Yuan
    Li, Juan
    Guo, Qin
    Jiang, Jin
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2021, 262
  • [29] Band engineering of BiOBr based materials for photocatalytic wastewater treatment via advanced oxidation processes (AOPs)-A review
    Saddique, Zohaib
    Imran, Muhammad
    Javaid, Ayesha
    Latif, Shoomaila
    Hussain, Nazim
    Kowal, Przemys law
    Boczkaj, Grzegorz
    WATER RESOURCES AND INDUSTRY, 2023, 29
  • [30] Heterogeneous Catalysis and Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) for Environmental Protection (VOC Oxidation, Air and Water Purification)
    Fiorenza, Roberto
    CATALYSTS, 2022, 12 (03)