Is a Distal Resection Margin of ≤ 1 cm Safe in Patients with Intermediate- to Low-Lying Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Yan, Han [1 ]
Wang, Peng-Yuan [1 ]
Wu, Ying-Chao [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Cun [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Xishiku St 8, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Distal resection margin; Rectal cancer; Meta-analysis; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; INTRAMURAL SPREAD; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOWER; 3RD; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-022-05342-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is generally accepted that the distal resection margin of intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer should be greater than 2 cm and at least 1 cm in special cases. This study intends to investigate whether a distal resection margin <= 1 cm affects tumor outcomes for patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Sixteen studies included data for distal resection margins <= 1 cm (1684 cases) and > 1 cm (5877 cases), and 5 studies included survival data. Meta-analysis was used to compare the local recurrence rate and long-term survival of patients with distal resection margins > or <= 1 cm. Results The local recurrence rate in the <= 1-cm margin group (9.5%) was 2.3% higher than that in the > 1-cm margin group (7.2%) according to a fixed-effects model (RR [95% CI] 1.42 [1.18, 1.70], P < 0.001). The overall survival results of the five 1-cm margin studies showed an HR (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.75, 1.24) (P = 0.78). Subgroup analysis showed that the local recurrence rate in the subgroup with perioperative treatment was 1.2% lower in the <= 1-cm margin group (8.3%) than in the > 1-cm margin group (9.5%) (RR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.63, 1.49], P = 0.90). In the surgery alone subgroup, the local recurrence rate was 4.7% higher in the <= 1-cm margin group (12.4%) than in the > 1-cm group (7.7%) (RR [95% CI] 1.76 [1.09, 2.83], P = 0.02). Conclusions For patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer undergoing surgery alone, a distal resection margin <= 1 cm may be not safe.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1803
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intersphincteric Resection Versus Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Peng Baifu
    Lu Jiabao
    Wu Zixin
    Li Guanwei
    Wei Fang
    Cao Jie
    Li Wanglin
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (04) : 392 - 401
  • [42] Distal Bowel Surgical Margin Shorter than 1 cm After Preoperative Radiation for Rectal Cancer: Is It Safe?
    Andrzej Rutkowski
    Krzysztof Bujko
    Marek P. Nowacki
    Ewa Chmielik
    Anna Nasierowska-Guttmejer
    Andrzej Wojnar
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15 : 3124 - 3131
  • [43] Comparison of Operative Time Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Zhen
    Yu, Hua
    Wu, Huaping
    Wang, Pingxi
    Zeng, Fanwei
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2023, 30 (03) : 390 - 397
  • [44] Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bobkiewicz, Adam
    Banasiewicz, Tomasz
    Krokowicz, Lukasz
    Paszkowski, Jacek
    Hermann, Jacek
    Malinger, Stanislaw
    Drews, Michal
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (02) : E18 - E18
  • [45] Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Musters, Gijsbert D.
    Buskens, Christianne J.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (09) : 1129 - 1139
  • [46] Extralevator vs conventional abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Negoi, Ionut
    Hostiuc, Sorin
    Paun, Sorin
    Negoi, Ruxandra I.
    Beuran, Mircea
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 212 (03): : 511 - 526
  • [47] Local resection versus radical resection for early-stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shufa Tan
    Chenxi Xu
    Hongbo Ma
    Shikai Chen
    Yunyi Yang
    Yanrong Zhan
    Jiyun Wu
    Zhenfu Sun
    Bozhi Ren
    Qi Zhou
    Yaping Cu
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2022, 37 : 1467 - 1483
  • [48] Oncologic outcomes of intersphincteric resection versus abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du, Qiang
    Yang, Wenming
    Zhang, Jianhao
    Qiu, Siyuan
    Liu, Xueting
    Wang, Yong
    Yang, Lie
    Zhou, Zongguang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (04) : 2338 - 2348
  • [49] Local resection versus radical resection for early-stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Shufa
    Xu, Chenxi
    Ma, Hongbo
    Chen, Shikai
    Yang, Yunyi
    Zhan, Yanrong
    Wu, Jiyun
    Sun, Zhenfu
    Ren, Bozhi
    Zhou, Qi
    Cu, Yaping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (07) : 1467 - 1483
  • [50] Ultra Low Anterior Resection for Distal Rectal Cancer - the End of the 1CM Rule?
    Ceelen, W.
    Van Nieuwenhove, Y.
    Putte, D. Vande
    Elshout, P. J.
    Pattyn, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S401 - S401