Is a Distal Resection Margin of ≤ 1 cm Safe in Patients with Intermediate- to Low-Lying Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Yan, Han [1 ]
Wang, Peng-Yuan [1 ]
Wu, Ying-Chao [1 ]
Liu, Yu-Cun [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Xishiku St 8, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Distal resection margin; Rectal cancer; Meta-analysis; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; INTRAMURAL SPREAD; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOWER; 3RD; SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-022-05342-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is generally accepted that the distal resection margin of intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer should be greater than 2 cm and at least 1 cm in special cases. This study intends to investigate whether a distal resection margin <= 1 cm affects tumor outcomes for patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Sixteen studies included data for distal resection margins <= 1 cm (1684 cases) and > 1 cm (5877 cases), and 5 studies included survival data. Meta-analysis was used to compare the local recurrence rate and long-term survival of patients with distal resection margins > or <= 1 cm. Results The local recurrence rate in the <= 1-cm margin group (9.5%) was 2.3% higher than that in the > 1-cm margin group (7.2%) according to a fixed-effects model (RR [95% CI] 1.42 [1.18, 1.70], P < 0.001). The overall survival results of the five 1-cm margin studies showed an HR (95% CI) of 0.96 (0.75, 1.24) (P = 0.78). Subgroup analysis showed that the local recurrence rate in the subgroup with perioperative treatment was 1.2% lower in the <= 1-cm margin group (8.3%) than in the > 1-cm margin group (9.5%) (RR [95% CI] 0.97 [0.63, 1.49], P = 0.90). In the surgery alone subgroup, the local recurrence rate was 4.7% higher in the <= 1-cm margin group (12.4%) than in the > 1-cm group (7.7%) (RR [95% CI] 1.76 [1.09, 2.83], P = 0.02). Conclusions For patients with intermediate- to low-lying rectal cancer undergoing surgery alone, a distal resection margin <= 1 cm may be not safe.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1803
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer
    Chan, D. S. Y.
    Reid, T. D.
    Howell, I.
    Lewis, W. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (04) : 456 - 464
  • [32] Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mechera, Robert
    Schuster, Tibor
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Speich, Benjamin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 72 : 84 - 94
  • [33] Risk factors for severe low anterior resection syndrome in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-preserving resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Lu-Lu
    Cheng, Tian-Cheng
    Xiang, Neng-Jun
    Chen, Peng
    Jiang, Zhi-Wei
    Liu, Xin-Xin
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [34] Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mechera, R.
    Schuster, T.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Speich, B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 5 - 5
  • [35] Prognostic Significance of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Jie
    Chen, Qi-Xun
    Teng, Li-song
    Krasna, Mark J.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (02): : 446 - 453
  • [36] Prognostic Significance of Circumferential Resection Margin Status in Oesophageal Cancer - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rotimi, O.
    Greenwood, D. C.
    Tu, Y. K.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2012, 228 : S8 - S8
  • [37] ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES IN RECTAL CANCER PATIENTS WITH DISTAL RESECTION MARGINS ≤ 1CM.
    Kang, D.
    Kwak, H.
    Sung, N.
    Kwak, J.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (05) : E228 - E228
  • [38] Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nigri, Giuseppe
    Petrucciani, Niccolo
    Belloni, Elena
    Lucarini, Alessio
    Aurello, Paolo
    D'Angelo, Francesco
    di Saverio, Salomone
    Fancellu, Alessandro
    Ramacciato, Giovanni
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [39] Distal Bowel Surgical Margin Shorter than 1 cm After Preoperative Radiation for Rectal Cancer: Is It Safe?
    Rutkowski, Andrzej
    Bujko, Krzysztof
    Nowacki, Marek P.
    Chmielik, Ewa
    Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Anna
    Wojnar, Andrzej
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (11) : 3124 - 3131
  • [40] Comment on: Prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin in the era of evolving surgical and multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meyer, Jeremy
    Wheeler, James
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Davies, Justin
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (05) : 1592 - 1593