DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model to Urban Public Infrastructure Investment Comprehensive Efficiency of China

被引:49
|
作者
Sun, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Huixia [1 ]
Zhou, Chi [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ Commerce, Sch Publ Adm, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ Technol, Sch Management, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
关键词
RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1155/2016/9814313
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In managerial application, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used by numerous studies to evaluate performances and solve the allocation problem. As the problem of infrastructure investment becomes more and more important in Chinese cities, it is of vital necessity to evaluate the investment efficiency and assign the fund. In practice, there are competitions among cities due to the scarcity of investment funds. However, the traditional DEA model is a pure self-evaluation model without considering the impacts of the other decision-making units (DMUs). Even though using the cross-efficiency model can figure out the best multiplier bundle for the unit and other DMUs, the solution is not unique. Therefore, this paper introduces the game theory into DEA cross-efficiency model to evaluate the infrastructure investment efficiency when cities compete with each other. In this paper, we analyze the case involving 30 provincial capital cities of China. And the result shows that the approach can accomplish a unique and efficient solution for each city (DMU) after the investment fund is allocated as an input variable.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DEA Cobb-Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency
    Cook, W. D.
    Zhu, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (02) : 265 - 268
  • [32] DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement
    Wu, Jie
    Chu, Junfei
    Sun, Jiasen
    Zhu, Qingyuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (02) : 571 - 579
  • [33] A DEA cross-efficiency approach based on bargaining theory
    Contreras, I.
    Lozano, S.
    Hinojosa, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2021, 72 (05) : 1156 - 1167
  • [34] DEA altruism and exclusiveness cross-efficiency evaluation models
    Li, L.
    Dai, W.
    Chu, J.
    Liu, X.
    Wang, Y.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2020, 27 (05) : 2499 - 2513
  • [35] Improving DEA cross-efficiency optimization in portfolio selection
    Amin, Gholam R.
    Hajjami, Mohaddeseh
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 168 (168)
  • [36] DEA altruism and exclusiveness cross-efficiency evaluation models
    Li L.
    Dai W.
    Chu J.
    Liu X.
    Wang Y.
    Scientia Iranica, 2020, 27 (05): : 2499 - 2513
  • [37] Environmental Efficiency Measurement Based on Cross-efficiency DEA models in Power Industry
    Niu, Dan
    Guo, Shuyu
    ADVANCED RESEARCH ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, INDUSTRY AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 63-64 : 659 - +
  • [38] DEA cross-efficiency framework for efficiency evaluation with probabilistic linguistic term sets
    Pan, Ling
    Xu, Zeshui
    Ren, Peijia
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2021, 72 (05) : 1191 - 1206
  • [39] DEA cross-efficiency framework for efficiency evaluation with probabilistic linguistic term sets
    Pan, Ling
    Xu, Zeshui
    Ren, Peijia
    Pan, Ling (xuzeshui@263.net), 2021, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (72) : 1191 - 1206
  • [40] The Study on the Evaluation Model of DEA Cross-efficiency and Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment in Decision making for Bidding of Construction Projects
    Li, Chuanjun
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED SCIENCES AND MANUFACTURING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 850-851 : 986 - 989