DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model to Urban Public Infrastructure Investment Comprehensive Efficiency of China

被引:49
|
作者
Sun, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Huixia [1 ]
Zhou, Chi [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ Commerce, Sch Publ Adm, Tianjin 300134, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ Technol, Sch Management, Tianjin 300384, Peoples R China
关键词
RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1155/2016/9814313
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In managerial application, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used by numerous studies to evaluate performances and solve the allocation problem. As the problem of infrastructure investment becomes more and more important in Chinese cities, it is of vital necessity to evaluate the investment efficiency and assign the fund. In practice, there are competitions among cities due to the scarcity of investment funds. However, the traditional DEA model is a pure self-evaluation model without considering the impacts of the other decision-making units (DMUs). Even though using the cross-efficiency model can figure out the best multiplier bundle for the unit and other DMUs, the solution is not unique. Therefore, this paper introduces the game theory into DEA cross-efficiency model to evaluate the infrastructure investment efficiency when cities compete with each other. In this paper, we analyze the case involving 30 provincial capital cities of China. And the result shows that the approach can accomplish a unique and efficient solution for each city (DMU) after the investment fund is allocated as an input variable.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] China's municipal public infrastructure: Estimating construction levels and investment efficiency using the entropy method and a DEA model
    Liu, Qianqian
    Wang, Shaojian
    Zhang, Wenzhong
    Li, Jiaming
    Zhao, Yabo
    Li, Wan
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 64 : 59 - 70
  • [22] Evaluation and spatial convergence of carbon emission reduction efficiency in China's power industry: Based on a three-stage DEA model with game cross-efficiency
    Wei, Xiaoxue
    Zhao, Rui
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 906
  • [23] Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model
    Zhang, Wenyu
    Yu, Hongze
    Ren, Lu
    Dong, Qing
    Zhao, Chenxiao
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 (12) : 9441 - 9454
  • [24] Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model
    Wenyu Zhang
    Hongze Yu
    Lu Ren
    Qing Dong
    Chenxiao Zhao
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 : 9441 - 9454
  • [25] Efficiency evaluation research of a regional water system based on a game cross-efficiency model
    Zhang, Wenyu
    Yu, Hongze
    Ren, Lu
    Dong, Qing
    Zhao, Chenxiao
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2022, 34 (12): : 9441 - 9454
  • [26] Analysis of the environmental efficiency in China based on the DEA cross-efficiency approach under different policy objectives
    Chen, Lei
    Wu, Fei-Mei
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Li, Mei-Juan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2020, 37 (03)
  • [27] Aggregating the DEA prospect cross-efficiency with an application to state key laboratories in China
    Liu, Hui-hui
    Song, Yao-yao
    Liu, Xiao-xiao
    Yang, Guo-liang
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2020, 71
  • [28] Operation Efficiency Evaluation of the China-Europe Freight Train Based on Grey Cross-Efficiency DEA
    Zhang, Jun
    Chang, Jianpeng
    Lin, Ping
    Song, Minzi
    Gong, Yanqiu
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2020, 2020
  • [29] Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
    Liang, Liang
    Wu, Jie
    Cook, Wade D.
    Zhu, Joe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 113 (02) : 1025 - 1030
  • [30] Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 128 (01) : 332 - 338