Decision learning framework for architecture design decisions of complex systems and system-of-systems

被引:12
|
作者
Raman, Ramakrishnan [1 ]
D'Souza, Meenakshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Honeywell Technol Solut Lab, Bangalore 560103, Karnataka, India
[2] Int Inst Informat Technol, Bangalore 560100, Karnataka, India
关键词
architecture design decisions; complex systems; learning cycles; system-of-systems; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1002/sys.21517
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Architecting complex systems and complex system-of-systems (SoS) have evinced keen interest recently. Architectural design decisions have a significant bearing on the operational measures of success, referred to as Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs), of the systems and SoS. Architecting complex systems and SoS involves making architecture design decisions despite uncertainty (due to knowledge gaps) on the implications associated with the decisions. The learning of whether the decision is optimal or not, and the impact on the MOEs and the emergent behavior of the SoS, often occur later, resulting in Learning Cycles. This paper proposes an integrated decision learning framework for architecture design decisions for complex systems and SoS. The proposed framework adopts a decision oriented view that factors the uncertainty associated with architectural decisions and the learning cycles and feedback loops experienced. The framework enables leverage of machine learning approaches to learn from the decision learning cycles experienced and factor it into the uncertainty assessments of the decisions. By inculcating various aspects such as knowledge gaps and learning cycles, by building models such as Learning Cycle Model and Uncertainty Model, and by incorporating deployment approaches such as codification of decision attributes and decision uncertainty assessments, the proposed framework enables progressive maturity of the architectural knowledge base and aids robustness in architecture design decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 560
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The design of a cloud-based tracker platform based on system-of-systems service architecture
    Victor W. Chu
    Raymond K. Wong
    Chi-Hung Chi
    Wei Zhou
    Ivan Ho
    Information Systems Frontiers, 2017, 19 : 1283 - 1299
  • [32] Convergence Research as a System-of-Systems': A Framework and Research Agenda
    Gajary, Lisa C.
    Misra, Shalini
    Desai, Anand
    Evasius, Dean M.
    Frechtling, Joy
    Pendlebury, David A.
    Schnell, Joshua D.
    Silverstein, Gary
    Wells, John
    MINERVA, 2024, 62 (02) : 253 - 286
  • [33] A System-of-Systems Framework of Data Analytics to Support Strategic Decision-Making in the Construction Industry
    Nickdoost, Navid
    Choi, Juyeong
    Abdelrazig, Yassir
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2022: COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, AUTOMATION, AND DATA ANALYTICS, 2022, : 412 - 421
  • [34] Approach to Capability-Based System-of-Systems Framework in Support of Naval Ship Design
    Olivier, Jacques P.
    Balestrini-Robinson, Santiago
    Briceno, Simon
    2014 8TH ANNUAL IEEE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON), 2014, : 388 - 395
  • [35] SAM-SoS: A Stochastic Software Architecture Modeling and Verification Approach for Complex System-of-Systems
    Mohsin, Ahmad
    Janjua, Naeem Khalid
    Islam, Syed M. S.
    Babar, Muhammad Ali
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 177580 - 177603
  • [36] Understanding the Dynamics of System-of-Systems in Complex Regional Conflicts
    Rapaport, Barbara
    Ireland, Vernon
    COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS 2012, 2012, 12 : 43 - 48
  • [37] System-of-Systems Architecture Selection: A Survey of Issues, Methods, and Opportunities
    Fang, Zhemei
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (03): : 4768 - 4779
  • [38] Obstacles of System-of-Systems
    Tekinerdogan, Bedir
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ISSE), 2022,
  • [39] A Network-Centric Architecture for Combat System-of-Systems Model
    Tian, Hua
    Gan, Zhi-chun
    INFORMATION AND AUTOMATION, 2011, 86 : 411 - 417
  • [40] System-of-Systems Complexity
    Kopetz, Hermann
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2013, (133): : 35 - 39