Decision learning framework for architecture design decisions of complex systems and system-of-systems

被引:12
|
作者
Raman, Ramakrishnan [1 ]
D'Souza, Meenakshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Honeywell Technol Solut Lab, Bangalore 560103, Karnataka, India
[2] Int Inst Informat Technol, Bangalore 560100, Karnataka, India
关键词
architecture design decisions; complex systems; learning cycles; system-of-systems; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1002/sys.21517
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Architecting complex systems and complex system-of-systems (SoS) have evinced keen interest recently. Architectural design decisions have a significant bearing on the operational measures of success, referred to as Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs), of the systems and SoS. Architecting complex systems and SoS involves making architecture design decisions despite uncertainty (due to knowledge gaps) on the implications associated with the decisions. The learning of whether the decision is optimal or not, and the impact on the MOEs and the emergent behavior of the SoS, often occur later, resulting in Learning Cycles. This paper proposes an integrated decision learning framework for architecture design decisions for complex systems and SoS. The proposed framework adopts a decision oriented view that factors the uncertainty associated with architectural decisions and the learning cycles and feedback loops experienced. The framework enables leverage of machine learning approaches to learn from the decision learning cycles experienced and factor it into the uncertainty assessments of the decisions. By inculcating various aspects such as knowledge gaps and learning cycles, by building models such as Learning Cycle Model and Uncertainty Model, and by incorporating deployment approaches such as codification of decision attributes and decision uncertainty assessments, the proposed framework enables progressive maturity of the architectural knowledge base and aids robustness in architecture design decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 560
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cognition Evolutionary Computation for System-of-systems Architecture Development
    Yang, Feng
    Dagli, Cihan
    Wang, Weiping
    COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS, 2011, 6
  • [22] A Novel Executable Modeling Approach for System-of-Systems Architecture
    Ge, Bingfeng
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Yang, Kewei
    Chen, Yingwu
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (01): : 4 - 13
  • [23] Simulation for a Coevolved System-of-Systems Meta-Architecture
    Muller, George
    Dagli, Cihan
    2016 11TH SYSTEMS OF SYSTEM ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (SOSE), IEEE, 2016,
  • [24] On the Emergent Behavior Oxymoron of System-of-Systems Architecture Description
    Oquendo, Flavio
    2018 13TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SOSE), 2018, : 417 - 424
  • [25] Technology Prioritization and Architecture Flexibility for Space System-of-Systems
    Guariniello, Cesare
    DeLaurentis, Daniel A.
    2023 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2023,
  • [26] Applicability of Fractal Architecture Based Microservices on System-of-Systems
    Dhamodaran, Bala Krishna
    DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, 2022, 465 : 109 - 125
  • [27] Design of an Optimized Architecture for Manned and Unmanned Combat System-of-Systems: Formulation and Coevolutionary Optimization
    Shu, Zhe
    Wang, Weiping
    Wang, Rui
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 52725 - 52740
  • [28] The design of a cloud-based tracker platform based on system-of-systems service architecture
    Chu, Victor W.
    Wong, Raymond K.
    Chi, Chi-Hung
    Zhou, Wei
    Ho, Ivan
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2017, 19 (06) : 1283 - 1299
  • [29] Validation Framework for Time-Triggered System-of-Systems
    Murshed, Ayman
    Abuteir, Mohammed
    Obermaisser, Roman
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROMISING ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES (ICPET 2017), 2017, : 103 - 108
  • [30] An Integrated Modeling Framework for Infrastructure System-of-systems Simulation
    Grogan, Paul T.
    de Weck, Olivier L.
    2013 7TH ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON 2013), 2013, : 483 - 490