Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multidetector CT

被引:379
|
作者
Lee, Mi-Jung
Kim, Sungjun
Lee, Sung-Ah
Song, Ho-Taek
Huh, Yong-Min
Kim, Dae-Hong
Han, Seung Hwan
Suh, Jin-Suck
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Korea Project Med Sci 21, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kuri City, Kyunggi Do, South Korea
[5] Ajou Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Suwon 441749, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.273065087
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
At magnetic resonance ( MR) imaging and multidetector computed tomography ( CT), artifacts arising from metallic orthopedic hardware are an obstacle to obtaining optimal images. Although various techniques for reducing such artifacts have been developed and corroborated by previous researchers, a new era of more powerful MR imaging and multidetector CT modalities has renewed the importance of a systematic consideration of methods for artifact reduction. Knowledge of the factors that contribute to artifacts, of related theories, and of artifact reduction techniques has become mandatory for radiologists. Factors that affect artifacts on MR images include the composition of the metallic hardware, the orientation of the hardware in relation to the direction of the main magnetic field, the strength of the magnetic field, the pulse sequence type, and other MR imaging parameters ( mainly voxel size, which is determined by the field of view, image matrix, section thickness, and echo train length). At multidetector CT, the factors that affect artifacts include the composition of the hardware, orientation of the hardware, acquisition parameters ( peak voltage, tube charge, collimation, and acquired section thickness), and reconstruction parameters ( reconstructed section thickness, reconstruction algorithm used, and whether an extended CT scale was used). A comparison of images obtained with different hardware and different acquisition and reconstruction parameters facilitates an understanding of methods for reducing or overcoming artifacts related to metallic implants. (C) RSNA, 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 803
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lower extremity MR angiography: Universal retrofitting of high-field-strength systems with stepping kinematic imaging platforms-initial experience
    Shetty, AN
    Bis, KG
    Duerinckx, AJ
    Narra, VR
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (01) : 284 - 291
  • [42] ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TEAR - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF MIDDLE-FIELD-STRENGTH AND HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR-IMAGING AT 1.5 AND 0.5 T
    VELLET, AD
    LEE, DH
    MUNK, PL
    HEWETT, L
    ELIASZIW, M
    DUNLAVY, S
    VIDITO, L
    FOWLER, PJ
    MINIACI, A
    AMENDOLA, A
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) : 826 - 830
  • [43] A low-cost, high-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging-compatible actuator
    Secoli, Riccardo
    Robinson, Matthew
    Brugnoli, Michele
    Rodriguez y Baena, Ferdinando
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2015, 229 (03) : 215 - 224
  • [44] Acute and subacute ischemic stroke at high-field-strength (3.0-T) diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Intraindividual comparative study
    Kuhl, CK
    Textor, J
    Gieseke, I
    von Falkenhausen, M
    Gernert, S
    Urbach, H
    Schild, HH
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) : 509 - 516
  • [45] Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging: The Promise of High-Field-Strength MRI in Coronary Artery Disease Assessment
    Rahsepar, Amir Ali
    Kim, Daniel
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 313 (01)
  • [46] Comparison of 1.0-T Extremity MR and 1.5-T Conventional High-Field-Strength MR in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Naraghi, Ali M.
    White, Lawrence M.
    Patel, Chirag
    Tomlinson, George
    Keystone, Edward C.
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (03) : 829 - 837
  • [47] MR Monitoring of NaCl-enhanced Radiofrequency Ablations: Observations on Low- and High-Field-Strength MR Images with Pathologic Correlation
    Nour, Sherif Gamal
    Goldberg, S. Nahum
    Wacker, Frank K.
    Rafie, Shervin
    Paul, Simi
    Heidenreich, Jens O.
    Rodgers, Mark
    Abdul-Karim, Fadi W.
    Duerk, Jeffrey L.
    Lewin, Jonathan S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (02) : 449 - 459
  • [48] Carbon fiber–reinforced PEEK versus titanium implants: an in vitro comparison of susceptibility artifacts in CT and MR imaging
    Theresa Krätzig
    Klaus C. Mende
    Malte Mohme
    Helge Kniep
    Marc Dreimann
    Martin Stangenberg
    Manfred Westphal
    Tobias Gauer
    Sven O. Eicker
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 2163 - 2170
  • [49] Biliary Imaging in Healthy Volunteers: Application of High-Field-Strength MRI and Gadoxetic Acid Contrast Agents
    Vessie, E.
    Harris, A.
    Spielmann, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)
  • [50] Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice -: Part II.: Technical considerations and clinical applications
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Traeber, Frank
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Drahanowsky, Wolfgang
    Morakkabati-Spitz, Nuschin
    Willinek, Winfried
    Von Falkenhausen, Marcus
    Manka, Christoph
    Schild, Hans H.
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 247 (01) : 16 - 35