Evaluation of modelled LOTOS-EUROS with observational based PM10 source attribution

被引:8
|
作者
Timmermans, R. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
van Pinxteren, D. [2 ]
Kranenburg, R. [1 ]
Hendriks, C. [1 ]
Fomba, K. W. [2 ]
Herrmann, H. [2 ]
Schaap, M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res TNO, Climate Air & Sustainabil Dept, Princetonlaan 6, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Leibniz Inst Tropospher Res TROPOS, Atmospher Chem Dept ACD, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Freie Univ Berlin FUB, Inst Meteorol, Berlin Carl Heinrich Becker Weg 6-10, D-12165 Berlin, Germany
[4] Princetonplein 6, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Ctr Sustainabil Challenges, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT-X | 2022年 / 14卷
关键词
Source attribution; Air pollution; Chemistry transport model; Germany; Particulate matter; PMF; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; EUROPEAN EMISSION INVENTORY; REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; PARTICULATE MATTER; AEROSOL; PM2.5; IMPACT; DUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100173
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to its serious health impact particulate matter is one of the air pollutants subject to abatement policies. Information on the main sources responsible for high concentrations of pollutants is therefore crucial to enable effective policy measures. In this study we compared two different methods for attribution of particulate matter concentrations to different sources: A tagging approach within the regional chemistry transport model LOTOSEUROS and an observational method using speciated particulate matter observations and Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF). The methods have been applied for winter 2016/2017 over Eastern Germany where in wintertime high woodburning emissions, cold temperatures and regular easterly winds can lead to a build-up of pollutant concentrations. The comparison allows the validation of the modelled source attribution for a selection of source categories. The contributions for biomass and total combustion compare well between both methods providing trust in the determined contributions, applied emissions including their timing. The total contribution from combustion is estimated between 3.3-7.7 mu g/m(3) (PMF) and 3.3-7.2 mu g/m(3) (LOTOS-EUROS) for the 9 stations incorporated in the study. The temporal Pearson correlation coefficient ranges between 0.3-0.64 for total combustion and 0.34 and 0.7 for biomass combustion. The mean absolute contributions for traffic at background stations also compare well with most values between 1.5-2.0 mu g/m(3) for PMF and 1-1.6 mu g/m(3) for LOTOS-EUROS. A lack of correlation for this contribution however suggests that the model has difficulty in representing the source category traffic in a time consistent manner and developments are needed to improve the temporal distribution of the traffic emissions within the model. The modelled particulate matter concentrations displayed a 20-40% underestimation of the observed concentrations with an increasing bias during high pollution events. The underestimation showed a high correlation with the observed contribution from combustion and secondary particulate matter including ammonium sulfate and organic carbon suggesting that at least a part of the missing mass in LOTOS-EUROS is related to transformation of volatile combustion emissions, likely from solid fuels, to secondary particle mass and missing enhanced formation of sulfate. Implementation of these missing processes would help to improve the source attribution of particulate matter with the LOTOS-EUROS model.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trend analysis of observational PM10 concentrations in Shimla city, India
    Ganguly, Rajiv
    Sharma, Divyansh
    Kumar, Prashant
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 51
  • [42] Source Apportionment of PM10 in Four Cities of Northeastern China
    Ni, Tianru
    Han, Bin
    Bai, Zhipeng
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (04) : 571 - 582
  • [43] Origin and source regions of PM10 in the Eastern Mediterranean atmosphere
    Kocak, Mustafa
    Mihalopoulos, Nikos
    Kubilay, Nilguen
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2009, 92 (04) : 464 - 474
  • [44] Evaluation and Prediction of PM10 and PM2.5 from Road Source Emissions in Kuala Lumpur City Centre
    Azhari, Azliyana
    Halim, Nor Diana Abdul
    Mohtar, Anis Asma Ahmad
    Aiyub, Kadaruddin
    Latif, Mohd Talib
    Ketzel, Matthias
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [45] Evaluation of Spatial Variability of PM10 Concentrations in London
    J. C. M. Pires
    F. G. Martins
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2012, 223 : 2287 - 2296
  • [46] WIND-TUNNEL EVALUATION OF PM10 SAMPLERS
    RANADE, MB
    WOODS, MC
    CHEN, FL
    PURDUE, LJ
    REHME, KA
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 13 (01) : 54 - 71
  • [47] Evaluation of EPA approved FRM PM10 samplers
    Thelen, Mary K.
    Faulkner, William B.
    Shaw, Bryan W.
    Lacey, Ronald E.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 238 : 433 - 433
  • [48] Evaluation of Spatial Variability of PM10 Concentrations in London
    Pires, J. C. M.
    Martins, F. G.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2012, 223 (05): : 2287 - 2296
  • [49] Field evaluation of PM10 detectors in a quarry environment
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Roma 3 University, Rome, Italy
    Int. J. Sustainable Dev. Plann., 3 (361-372):
  • [50] Association of alveolar macrophage carbon loading and annual modelled PM10 at residence in healthy children
    Kulkarni, N
    Pierse, N
    Rushton, L
    Grigg, J
    THORAX, 2005, 60 : II18 - II18