Evaluation of modelled LOTOS-EUROS with observational based PM10 source attribution

被引:8
|
作者
Timmermans, R. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
van Pinxteren, D. [2 ]
Kranenburg, R. [1 ]
Hendriks, C. [1 ]
Fomba, K. W. [2 ]
Herrmann, H. [2 ]
Schaap, M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res TNO, Climate Air & Sustainabil Dept, Princetonlaan 6, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Leibniz Inst Tropospher Res TROPOS, Atmospher Chem Dept ACD, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Freie Univ Berlin FUB, Inst Meteorol, Berlin Carl Heinrich Becker Weg 6-10, D-12165 Berlin, Germany
[4] Princetonplein 6, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Ctr Sustainabil Challenges, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT-X | 2022年 / 14卷
关键词
Source attribution; Air pollution; Chemistry transport model; Germany; Particulate matter; PMF; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; EUROPEAN EMISSION INVENTORY; REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; PARTICULATE MATTER; AEROSOL; PM2.5; IMPACT; DUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100173
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to its serious health impact particulate matter is one of the air pollutants subject to abatement policies. Information on the main sources responsible for high concentrations of pollutants is therefore crucial to enable effective policy measures. In this study we compared two different methods for attribution of particulate matter concentrations to different sources: A tagging approach within the regional chemistry transport model LOTOSEUROS and an observational method using speciated particulate matter observations and Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF). The methods have been applied for winter 2016/2017 over Eastern Germany where in wintertime high woodburning emissions, cold temperatures and regular easterly winds can lead to a build-up of pollutant concentrations. The comparison allows the validation of the modelled source attribution for a selection of source categories. The contributions for biomass and total combustion compare well between both methods providing trust in the determined contributions, applied emissions including their timing. The total contribution from combustion is estimated between 3.3-7.7 mu g/m(3) (PMF) and 3.3-7.2 mu g/m(3) (LOTOS-EUROS) for the 9 stations incorporated in the study. The temporal Pearson correlation coefficient ranges between 0.3-0.64 for total combustion and 0.34 and 0.7 for biomass combustion. The mean absolute contributions for traffic at background stations also compare well with most values between 1.5-2.0 mu g/m(3) for PMF and 1-1.6 mu g/m(3) for LOTOS-EUROS. A lack of correlation for this contribution however suggests that the model has difficulty in representing the source category traffic in a time consistent manner and developments are needed to improve the temporal distribution of the traffic emissions within the model. The modelled particulate matter concentrations displayed a 20-40% underestimation of the observed concentrations with an increasing bias during high pollution events. The underestimation showed a high correlation with the observed contribution from combustion and secondary particulate matter including ammonium sulfate and organic carbon suggesting that at least a part of the missing mass in LOTOS-EUROS is related to transformation of volatile combustion emissions, likely from solid fuels, to secondary particle mass and missing enhanced formation of sulfate. Implementation of these missing processes would help to improve the source attribution of particulate matter with the LOTOS-EUROS model.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seasonal Variation and Source Identification of PM10 in an Industrialized City
    Khobragade, Pallavi Pradeep
    Ahirwar, Ajay Vikram
    MACROMOLECULAR SYMPOSIA, 2023, 410 (01)
  • [32] Source apportionment of PM10 in six cities of northern China
    Bi, Xiaohui
    Feng, Yinchang
    Wu, Jianhui
    Wang, Yuqiu
    Zhu, Tan
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (05) : 903 - 912
  • [33] Air Quality and PM10 Source Analysis on the Railway Vehicles
    Park, Duckshin
    Kim, Dongsool
    Cho, Youngmin
    Kwon, Soonbark
    Park, Eunyoung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 23 (03) : 311 - 321
  • [34] PM10 source characterization at urban and highway roadside locations
    Furusjo, Erik
    Sternbeck, John
    Cousins, Anna Palm
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 387 (1-3) : 206 - 219
  • [35] Receptor model based source apportionment of PM10 in the metropolitan and industrialized areas of Mangalore
    Kalaiarasan, Gopinath
    Balakrishnan, Raj Mohan
    Khaparde, V. V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2016, 6 : 195 - 203
  • [36] Source apportionment of indoor PM10 in Elderly Care Centre
    Almeida-Silva, M.
    Faria, T.
    Saraga, D.
    Maggos, T.
    Wolterbeek, H. T.
    Almeida, S. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (08) : 7814 - 7827
  • [37] PM10 Source Identification: A Case of a Coastal City in Colombia
    Gomez-Plata, Leandro
    Agudelo-Castaneda, Dayana
    Castillo, Margarita
    Teixeira, Elba C.
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (10)
  • [38] Estimating the emission source reduction of PM10 in central Taiwan
    Lu, HC
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2004, 54 (07) : 805 - 814
  • [39] Source identification and estimation of source apportionment for ambient PM10 in Seoul, Korea
    Yi S.-M.
    Hwang I.
    Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 2014, 8 (3) : 115 - 125
  • [40] Source apportionment of indoor PM10 in Elderly Care Centre
    M. Almeida-Silva
    T. Faria
    D. Saraga
    T. Maggos
    H. T. Wolterbeek
    S. M. Almeida
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23 : 7814 - 7827