Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Aziz, Muhammad [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohaib [2 ]
Haghbin, Hossein [3 ]
Pervez, Asad [4 ]
Goyal, Hemant [5 ]
Kamal, Faisal [6 ]
Kobeissy, Abdallah [1 ]
Nawras, Ali [1 ]
Adler, Douglas G. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Internal Med, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ascens Providence Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Southfield, MI USA
[4] West Virginia Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[5] Wright Ctr Grad Med Educ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Scranton, PA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Porter Adventist Hosp, Ctr Adv Therapeut Endoscopy CATE, Centura Hlth, Peak Gastroenterol, Denver, CO 80210 USA
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; BOWEL PREPARATION; RISK-FACTORS; WHITE-LIGHT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ENDOSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1794-0346
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Recent studies evaluated the impact of i-scan in improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. We aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of this technique. Methods A thorough search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. Full-text RCTs and cohort studies directly comparing i-scan and HD colonoscopy were deemed eligible for inclusion. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled and compared using random effects model and DerSimonianLaird approach. For each outcome, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value was generated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of five studies with six arms were included in this analysis. A total of 2620 patients (mean age 58.6 +/- 7.2 years and female proportion 44.8%) completed the study and were included in our analysis. ADR was significantly higher with any i-scan (RR: 1.20, [CI: 1.06-1.34], P = 0.003) compared to HD colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ADR was significantly higher using iscan with surface and contrast enhancement only (RR: 1.25, [CI: 1.07-1.47], P = 0.004). Conclusions i-scan has the potential to increase ADR using the surface and contrast enhancement method. Future studies evaluating other outcomes of interest such as proximal adenomas and serrated lesions are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:E824 / E831
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High-Definition Colonoscopy With I-Scan Gives to Young Endoscopists Similar Accuracy in Detecting Colonic Lesions Than Expert Endoscopists
    Notaristefano, Chiara
    Viale, Edi
    Testoni, Pier Alberto
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 483 - 483
  • [42] Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fernandes, Carlos
    Estevinho, Manuela
    Cruz, Manuel Marques
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 57 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [43] Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Hassan, Cesare
    La Marca, Marina
    Paci, Valentina
    Smania, Veronica
    De Bortoli, Nicola
    Bazzoli, Franco
    Repici, Alessandro
    Rex, Douglas
    Cadoni, Sergio
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (04) : 589 - +
  • [44] New Technologies Increase Adenoma Detection Rate, Adenoma Miss Rate and Polyp Detection Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Castaneda, Daniel
    Verheyen, Elijah
    Wander, Praneet
    Popov, Violeta
    Gross, Seth A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S110 - S110
  • [45] High Definition Colonoscopy With I-SCAN and Digital Chromoendoscopy in the Pit Pattern Analysis: a Single Center Experience
    Notaristefano, Chiara
    Viale, Edi
    Di Marco, Benedetto
    Maselli, Roberta
    Testoni, Pier Alberto
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB384 - AB384
  • [46] Improved Overall Adenoma Detection Rate and Sessile Serrated Adenoma Detection Rate With Endocuff: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Saligram, Shreyas
    Pant, Chaitanya
    Kanakadandi, Vijay
    Bansal, Ajay
    Wani, Sachin B.
    Rastogi, Amit
    Olyaee, Mojtaba S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB362 - AB362
  • [47] MORNING VERSUS AFTERNOON ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Barakat, Mohamed
    Carr-Locke, David L.
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB397 - AB398
  • [48] Morning versus afternoon adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barakat, Mohamed
    Panchal, Ankur
    Abdelfatah, Mohamed M.
    Elhanafi, Sherif
    Carr-Locke, David L.
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 467 - 474
  • [49] Impact of cuff-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qi
    Gao, Hai-de
    Liu, Chun-Cheng
    Zhang, Hao
    Li, Xun-Hai
    Wu, Jia
    Zhang, Xian-Kai
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (20)
  • [50] Use of artificial intelligence improves colonoscopy performance in adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Makar, Jonathan
    Abdelmalak, Jonathan
    Con, Danny
    Hafeez, Bilal
    Garg, Mayur
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 101 (01)