Does i-scan improve adenoma detection rate compared to high-definition colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Aziz, Muhammad [1 ]
Ahmed, Zohaib [2 ]
Haghbin, Hossein [3 ]
Pervez, Asad [4 ]
Goyal, Hemant [5 ]
Kamal, Faisal [6 ]
Kobeissy, Abdallah [1 ]
Nawras, Ali [1 ]
Adler, Douglas G. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Internal Med, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ascens Providence Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Southfield, MI USA
[4] West Virginia Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[5] Wright Ctr Grad Med Educ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Scranton, PA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Porter Adventist Hosp, Ctr Adv Therapeut Endoscopy CATE, Centura Hlth, Peak Gastroenterol, Denver, CO 80210 USA
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; BOWEL PREPARATION; RISK-FACTORS; WHITE-LIGHT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ENDOSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1794-0346
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Recent studies evaluated the impact of i-scan in improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. We aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of this technique. Methods A thorough search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. Full-text RCTs and cohort studies directly comparing i-scan and HD colonoscopy were deemed eligible for inclusion. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled and compared using random effects model and DerSimonianLaird approach. For each outcome, relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value was generated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of five studies with six arms were included in this analysis. A total of 2620 patients (mean age 58.6 +/- 7.2 years and female proportion 44.8%) completed the study and were included in our analysis. ADR was significantly higher with any i-scan (RR: 1.20, [CI: 1.06-1.34], P = 0.003) compared to HD colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ADR was significantly higher using iscan with surface and contrast enhancement only (RR: 1.25, [CI: 1.07-1.47], P = 0.004). Conclusions i-scan has the potential to increase ADR using the surface and contrast enhancement method. Future studies evaluating other outcomes of interest such as proximal adenomas and serrated lesions are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:E824 / E831
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High definition colonoscopy combined with i-Scan is superior in the detection of colorectal neoplasias compared with standard video colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Hoffman, A.
    Sar, F.
    Goetz, M.
    Tresch, A.
    Mudter, J.
    Biesterfeld, S.
    Galle, P. R.
    Neurath, M. F.
    Kiesslich, R.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (10) : 827 - 833
  • [32] High-Resolution Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Adenoma Detection Rate
    Koneru, Praveen
    Han, Samuel
    Singh, Anupam
    Levey, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 : S548 - S548
  • [33] Endoscopy Unit Level Interventions to Improve Adenoma Detection Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Arora, Anshul
    Mcdonald, Cassandra
    Guizzetti, Leonardo
    Iansavichene, Alla
    Brahmania, Mayur
    Khanna, Nitin
    Wilson, Aze
    Jairath, Vipul
    Sey, Michael
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (13) : 3238 - 3257
  • [34] High Definition Plus Colonoscopy Combined with I-Scan Is Superior in the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Neoplasias Compared to Standard Video Colonoscopy - A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Hoffman, Arthur
    Sar, Fachrie
    Goetz, Martin
    Mudter, Jonas
    Biesterfeld, Stefan
    Galle, Peter R.
    Neurath, Markus F.
    Kiesslich, Ralf
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB131 - AB132
  • [35] Does Intravenous Glucagon Improve Colonoscopy Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ghazaleh, Sami
    Beran, Azizullah
    Nehme, Christian
    Awad, Mohammed T.
    Sharma, Sachit
    Patel, Dipen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S268 - S269
  • [36] Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boregowda, Umesha
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Paleti, Swathi
    Olyaee, Mojtaba
    Rastogi, Amit
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 34 (02): : 214 - +
  • [37] NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVICES INCREASE SESSILE SERRATED ADENOMA DETECTION RATE IN COLONOSCOPY - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Verheyen, Elijah
    Castaneda, Daniel
    Gross, Seth A.
    Popov, Violeta
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB486 - AB486
  • [38] Improved detection of proximal colon adenomas with i-scan in comparison to high-definition white light endoscopy
    Neumann, Helmut
    Vieth, Michael
    Guenther, Claudia
    Neurath, Markus F.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 9 - 10
  • [39] Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Iannone, Andrea
    Maselli, Roberta
    Jovani, Manol
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Yu, Honggang
    Areia, Miguel
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Wallace, Michael
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 77 - +
  • [40] Devices and Techniques to Improve Colon Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alali, Ali
    Barkun, Alan N.
    Martel, Myriam
    Cadrin-Tourigny, Anne
    Von Renteln, Daniel A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB55 - AB55