Changes in biofilm composition and microbial water quality in drinking water distribution systems by temperature increase induced through thermal energy recovery

被引:14
|
作者
Ahmad, Jawairia Imtiaz [1 ,3 ]
Dignum, Marco [2 ]
Liu, Gang [1 ,4 ]
Medema, Gertjan [1 ,5 ,6 ]
van der Hoek, Jan Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Water Management, Sanit Engn, POB 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Waternet, Korte Ouderkerkerdijk 7, NL-1096 AC Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Environm Sci & Engn, H-12 Sect, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Key Lab Drinking Water Sci & Technol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[5] KWR Water Res Inst, POB 1072, NL-3430 BB Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[6] Michigan State Univ, 1405 S Harrison Rd, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
关键词
Cold recovery; Drinking water distribution system; Temperature increase; Microbial water quality; Primary colonizers; Microbial source tracking; Biofilm; NUCLEIC-ACID-CONTENT; BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES; BULK WATER; DYNAMICS; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2020.110648
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs) have been thoroughly studied, but the concept of thermal energy recovery from DWDSs is very new and has been conceptualized in the past few years. Cold recovery results in a temperature increase of the drinking water. Its effects on drinking water quality and biofilm development are unclear. Hence, we studied both bulk water and biofilm phases for 232 days in two parallel pilot scale distribution systems with two temperature settings after cold recovery, 25 degrees C and 30 degrees C, and compared these with a reference pilot system without cold recovery. In all three pilot distributions systems (DSs) our results showed an initial increase in biomass (ATP) in the biofilm phase, along with occurrence of primary colonizers (Betapro-teobacteriales) and subsequently a decrease in biomass and an increasing relative abundance of other microbial groups (amoeba resisting groups; Xanthobacteraceae, Legionellales), including those responsible for EPS formation in biofilms (Sphingomonadaceae). The timeline for biofilm microbial development was different for the three pilot DSs: the higher the temperature, the faster the development took place. With respect to the water phase within the three pilot DSs, major microbial contributions came from the feed water (17-100%) and unkown sources (2-80%). Random contributions of biofilm (0-70%) were seen between day 7-77. During this time period sixfold higher ATP concentration (7-11 ng/l) and two-fold higher numbers of high nucleic acid cells (5.20-5.80 x 10(4) cells/ml) were also observed in the effluent water from all three pilot DSs, compared to the feed water. At the end of the experimental period the microbial composition of effluent water from three pilot DSs revealed no differences, except the presence of a biofilm related microbial group (Sphingomonadaceae), within all three DSs compared to the feed water. In the biofilm phase higher temperatures initiated the growth of primary colonizing bacteria but this did not lead to differences in microbial diversity and composition at the end of the experimental period. Hence, we propose that the microbiological water quality of DWDSs with cold recovery should be monitored more frequently during the first 2-3 months of operation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environment protection -: Modeling water quality in drinking water distribution systems
    Gavrila, C
    Târlea, G
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2006, 57 (01): : 101 - 103
  • [32] Water quality in drinking water distribution systems: research trends through the 21st century
    Weston, Sally L.
    Scheili, Anna
    Behmel, Sonja
    Rodriguez, Manuel J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 8 (12) : 3054 - 3064
  • [33] Effects of bacterial community composition and structure in drinking water distribution systems on biofilm formation and chlorine resistance
    Zhu, Zebing
    Shan, Lili
    Zhang, Xinyun
    Hu, Fengping
    Zhong, Dan
    Yuan, Yixing
    Zhang, Jie
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2021, 264 (264)
  • [34] Understanding, Monitoring, and Controlling Biofilm Growth in Drinking Water Distribution Systems
    Liu, Sanly
    Gunawan, Cindy
    Barraud, Nicolas
    Rice, Scott A.
    Harry, Elizabeth J.
    Amal, Rose
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (17) : 8954 - 8976
  • [35] The bacterial biofilm resistome in drinking water distribution systems: A systematic review
    Gholipour, Sahar
    Shamsizadeh, Zahra
    Gwenzi, Willis
    Nikaeen, Mahnaz
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2023, 329
  • [36] Influence of phosphorus on biofilm formation in model drinking water distribution systems
    Fang, W.
    Hu, J. Y.
    Ong, S. L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 106 (04) : 1328 - 1335
  • [37] Effects of phosphorus on biofilm disinfections in model drinking water distribution systems
    Fang, Wei
    Hu, Jiangyong
    Ong, Say Leong
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2010, 8 (03) : 446 - 454
  • [38] Comparison of biofilm cell quantification methods for drinking water distribution systems
    Waller, Sharon A.
    Packman, Aaron I.
    Hausner, Martina
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 144 : 8 - 21
  • [39] Response of microorganisms in biofilm to sulfadiazine and ciprofloxacin in drinking water distribution systems
    Wang, Haibo
    Hu, Chun
    Shen, Yi
    Shi, Baoyou
    Zhao, Dan
    Xing, Xueci
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2019, 218 : 197 - 204
  • [40] Impact of orthophosphate addition on biofilm development in drinking water distribution systems
    Gouider, Mbarka
    Bouzid, Jalel
    Sayadi, Sami
    Montiel, Antoine
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 167 (1-3) : 1198 - 1202