Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT)

被引:3
|
作者
Pal, Abhijit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stapleton, Sarah [2 ]
Yap, Christina [4 ,5 ]
Lai-Kwon, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Daly, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Magkos, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Baikady, Bindumalini Rao [1 ,2 ]
Minchom, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Banerji, Udai [1 ,2 ]
De Bono, Johann [1 ,2 ]
Karikios, Deme [3 ]
Boyle, Frances [3 ]
Lopez, Juanita [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp Sutton, Drug Dev Unit, London, England
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Birmingham, Canc Res UK, Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Clin Trials & Stat Unit, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
QUALITY; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049217
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Early phase cancer clinical trials have become increasingly complicated in terms of patient selection and trial procedures-this is reflected in the increasing length of participant information sheets (PIS). Informed consent for early phase clinical trials has been contentious clue to the potential ethical issues associated with performing experimental research on a terminally ill population which has exhausted standard treatment options. Empirical studies have demonstrated significant gaps in patient understanding regarding the nature and intent of these trials. This study aims to test whether enhanced informed consent for patient education can improve patient scores on a validated questionnaire testing clinical trial comprehension. Methods and analysis This is a randomised controlled trial that will allocate patients who are eligible to participate in one of four investigator-initiated clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit to either a standard arm or an experimental arm, stratified by age and educational level. The standard arm will involve the full length trial PIS, followed by electronic or paper administration of the Quality of Informed Consent Questionnaire Parts A and B (QuIC-A and QuIC-B). The experimental arm will involve the full length trial PIS, exposure to a two-page study aid and 10 online educational videos, followed by administration of the QuIC-A and QuIC-B. The primary endpoint will be the difference (using a one-sided two-sample t-test) in the QuIC-A score, which measures objective understanding, between the standard and experimental arm. Accrual target is at least 17 patients per arm to detect an 8 point difference (80% power, alpha 0.05). Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was granted by the National Health Service Health Research Authority on 15 June 2020-IRAS Project ID 277065, Protocol Number CCR5165, REC Reference 20/EE/0155. Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigator Disclosure and Advanced Cancer Patient Understanding of Informed Consent and Prognosis in Phase I Clinical Trials
    Hlubocky, Fay J.
    Kass, Nancy E.
    Roter, Debra
    Larson, Susan
    Wroblewski, Kristen E.
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    Daugherty, Christopher K.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 14 (06) : 375 - +
  • [42] Pilot study demonstrating effectiveness of targeted education to improve informed consent understanding in AIDS clinical trials
    Sengupta, Sohini
    Lo, Bernard
    Strauss, Ronald P.
    Eron, Joseph
    Gifford, Allen L.
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2011, 23 (11): : 1382 - 1391
  • [43] Ethical concerns about patients understanding of the informed consent in clinical trials
    Meneguin, S.
    Machado Cesar, L. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 859 - 859
  • [44] Improved participants’ understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials
    Nut Koonrungsesomboon
    Thipaporn Tharavanij
    Kittichet Phiphatpatthamaamphan
    Ratha-korn Vilaichone
    Sudsayam Manuwong
    Parichat Curry
    Sith Siramolpiwat
    Thanachai Punchaipornpon
    Supakit Kanitnate
    Nattapol Tammachote
    Rodsarin Yamprasert
    Waipoj Chanvimalueng
    Ruchirat Kaewkumpai
    Soiphet Netanong
    Peerapong Kitipawong
    Paskorn Sritipsukho
    Juntra Karbwang
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2017, 73 : 141 - 149
  • [45] Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials
    Koonrungsesomboon, Nut
    Tharavanij, Thipaporn
    Phiphatpatthamaamphan, Kittichet
    Vilaichone, Ratha-korn
    Manuwong, Sudsayam
    Curry, Parichat
    Siramolpiwat, Sith
    Punchaipornpon, Thanachai
    Kanitnate, Supakit
    Tammachote, Nattapol
    Yamprasert, Rodsarin
    Chanvimalueng, Waipoj
    Kaewkumpai, Ruchirat
    Netanong, Soiphet
    Kitipawong, Peerapong
    Sritipsukho, Paskorn
    Karbwang, Juntra
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 73 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [46] Patient reported measures of informed consent for clinical trials: A systematic review
    Gillies, Katie
    Duthie, Alexander
    Cotton, Seonaidh
    Campbell, Marion K.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [47] Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension
    Sanchini, Virginia
    Reni, Michele
    Calori, Giliola
    Riva, Elisabetta
    Reichlin, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2014, 40 (04) : 269 - 275
  • [48] A randomized controlled trial comparing video-assisted informed consent with standard consent for Mohs micrographic surgery
    Miao, Yueyue
    Venning, Victoria L.
    Mallitt, Kylie-Ann
    Rhodes, Julia E. J.
    Isserman, Noah J.
    Moreno, Gilberto
    Lee, Simon
    Ryman, William
    Fischer, Gayle
    Saunderson, Rebecca B.
    Leonards
    JAAD INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 1 (01): : 13 - 20
  • [50] A brief measure of perceived understanding of informed consent in a clinical trial was validated
    Guarino, P
    Lamping, DL
    Elbourne, D
    Carpenter, J
    Peduzzi, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (06) : 608 - 614