Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT)

被引:3
|
作者
Pal, Abhijit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stapleton, Sarah [2 ]
Yap, Christina [4 ,5 ]
Lai-Kwon, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Daly, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Magkos, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Baikady, Bindumalini Rao [1 ,2 ]
Minchom, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Banerji, Udai [1 ,2 ]
De Bono, Johann [1 ,2 ]
Karikios, Deme [3 ]
Boyle, Frances [3 ]
Lopez, Juanita [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp Sutton, Drug Dev Unit, London, England
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Birmingham, Canc Res UK, Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Clin Trials & Stat Unit, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
QUALITY; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049217
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Early phase cancer clinical trials have become increasingly complicated in terms of patient selection and trial procedures-this is reflected in the increasing length of participant information sheets (PIS). Informed consent for early phase clinical trials has been contentious clue to the potential ethical issues associated with performing experimental research on a terminally ill population which has exhausted standard treatment options. Empirical studies have demonstrated significant gaps in patient understanding regarding the nature and intent of these trials. This study aims to test whether enhanced informed consent for patient education can improve patient scores on a validated questionnaire testing clinical trial comprehension. Methods and analysis This is a randomised controlled trial that will allocate patients who are eligible to participate in one of four investigator-initiated clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit to either a standard arm or an experimental arm, stratified by age and educational level. The standard arm will involve the full length trial PIS, followed by electronic or paper administration of the Quality of Informed Consent Questionnaire Parts A and B (QuIC-A and QuIC-B). The experimental arm will involve the full length trial PIS, exposure to a two-page study aid and 10 online educational videos, followed by administration of the QuIC-A and QuIC-B. The primary endpoint will be the difference (using a one-sided two-sample t-test) in the QuIC-A score, which measures objective understanding, between the standard and experimental arm. Accrual target is at least 17 patients per arm to detect an 8 point difference (80% power, alpha 0.05). Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was granted by the National Health Service Health Research Authority on 15 June 2020-IRAS Project ID 277065, Protocol Number CCR5165, REC Reference 20/EE/0155. Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Contents and Readability of Informed Consent Forms for Oncology Clinical Trials
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    Pond, Gregory R.
    Heslegrave, Ronald J.
    Enright, Katherine
    Potanina, Larissa
    Siu, Lillian L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 33 (04): : 387 - 392
  • [22] Optimized Informed Consent for Psychotherapy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gerke, Leonie
    Ladwig, Soenke
    Pauls, Franz
    Trachsel, Manuel
    Haerter, Martin
    Nestoriuc, Yvonne
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [23] Digital solutions to improve the informed consent process for clinical trials
    Abujarad, Fuad
    Lizbinski, R. Leonardo
    Ibrahim, Hagar
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (01) : 10 - 12
  • [24] Prospective and observational study of the patient informed consent for clinical trials with drugs
    Ordovas Baines, Juan Pablo
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2008, 131 (11): : 422 - 425
  • [25] Assessing participant understanding of clinical trials and the informed consent.
    Debari, Rhea
    Servodidio, Camille
    Clark, Edith
    Newlin, Jonathan
    Kozlowski, Cecilia
    Rodriguez-Furlow, Maria
    Palomares, Maria
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2007, 34 (01) : 243 - 243
  • [26] Understanding, voluntariness and informed consent in daily clinical trials practice: perceptions of oncology nurses
    Beadle, G.
    Mengersen, K.
    Moynihan, S.
    Yates, P.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 212 - 212
  • [27] Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials - An ''elaborate ritual''?
    Mason, S
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 1997, 76 (03): : F143 - F145
  • [28] Outcome reporting in informed consent randomised controlled trials lacks consistency
    McCain, R. S.
    Gray, R. T.
    Convie, L.
    McKinley, N.
    Clarke, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 16 - 17
  • [29] Clinical trials research: Challenges of patient education and informed consent
    Levine, A
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2005, 32 (04) : 737 - 739
  • [30] Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms
    Davis, TC
    Holcombe, RF
    Berkel, HJ
    Pramanik, S
    Divers, SG
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (09): : 668 - 674