Does Public Investment Promote Intergenerational Mobility? Who Really Benefits?

被引:5
|
作者
Song, Lijie [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Intergeneration income mobility; Public investment; Beneficiaries; Bias; China; LIFE-CYCLE BIAS; INCOME MOBILITY; CHINA; INEQUALITY; EDUCATION; EARNINGS; PERSISTENCE; TRENDS; DETERMINANTS; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-021-02708-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The conventional model of intergenerational income mobility suggests child's income is a function of his human capital investment determined by parental income, which neglects the role of public investment. This paper aims to distinguish whether and how public investment affects intergenerational income mobility and who are the actual beneficiaries. Data used for analysis is from China Health and Nutrition Survey, and is precisely matched to provincial public investment data. To mitigate the potential biases, average income of at least three waves is adopted. Through investigations, this study finds public investment could promote intergenerational income mobility obviously but unequally. Middle-distributed income groups are found to benefit more from public investment than the upper and bottom tail of the income distribution. The opportunities for the middle-distributed income groups are fairly better, while it seems harder for individuals of the bottom income distribution to have a breakthrough. Positional changes between middle income groups and top income groups contribute largely to the intergenerational income mobility during the sample period. Regions with higher public investment present higher mobility as well. To promote intergenerational mobility, public investment should target more precisely at lower income groups.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 80
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Who really benefits from surgical tray reduction?
    John-Baptiste, Ava
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 : S2074 - S2075
  • [42] Does organizational form really matter to investment firms?
    Han, XiaoXiao
    Lazrak, Skander
    Trabelsi, Samir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2023, 19 (03) : 473 - 490
  • [43] How does gender really affect investment behavior?
    Marinelli, Nicoletta
    Mazzoli, Camilla
    Palmucci, Fabrizio
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 151 : 58 - 61
  • [44] Evidence of economic benefits for public investment in MPAs
    Pascal, Nicolas
    Brathwaite, Angelique
    Brander, Luke
    Seidl, Andrew
    Philip, Maxime
    Clua, Eric
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 30 : 3 - 13
  • [45] Construction of Public Investment Benefits Indicator System
    Lei, Chen
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION REFORM AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION (ERMI 2012), VOL 3, 2013, : 9 - 12
  • [46] Does proxy voting really promote corporate sustainability?
    Bernard, Julie
    Boiral, Olivier
    Guillaumie, Laurence
    Brotherton, Marie-Christine
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2023, 31 (03) : 445 - 463
  • [47] DOES ANSWERING QUESTIONS REALLY PROMOTE ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING
    PRESSLEY, M
    BRYANT, SL
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1982, 53 (05) : 1258 - 1267
  • [48] Major sales:: Who really does the buying?
    Bonoma, TV
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 84 (7-8) : 172 - +
  • [49] MAJOR SALES - WHO REALLY DOES THE BUYING
    BONOMA, TV
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1982, 60 (03) : 111 - 119
  • [50] Boycotting a dictatorship: who does it really hurt?
    Delacote, Philippe
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2009, 29 (03): : 1856 - 1862