Does Public Investment Promote Intergenerational Mobility? Who Really Benefits?

被引:5
|
作者
Song, Lijie [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Intergeneration income mobility; Public investment; Beneficiaries; Bias; China; LIFE-CYCLE BIAS; INCOME MOBILITY; CHINA; INEQUALITY; EDUCATION; EARNINGS; PERSISTENCE; TRENDS; DETERMINANTS; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-021-02708-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The conventional model of intergenerational income mobility suggests child's income is a function of his human capital investment determined by parental income, which neglects the role of public investment. This paper aims to distinguish whether and how public investment affects intergenerational income mobility and who are the actual beneficiaries. Data used for analysis is from China Health and Nutrition Survey, and is precisely matched to provincial public investment data. To mitigate the potential biases, average income of at least three waves is adopted. Through investigations, this study finds public investment could promote intergenerational income mobility obviously but unequally. Middle-distributed income groups are found to benefit more from public investment than the upper and bottom tail of the income distribution. The opportunities for the middle-distributed income groups are fairly better, while it seems harder for individuals of the bottom income distribution to have a breakthrough. Positional changes between middle income groups and top income groups contribute largely to the intergenerational income mobility during the sample period. Regions with higher public investment present higher mobility as well. To promote intergenerational mobility, public investment should target more precisely at lower income groups.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 80
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development?
    Khan, Saleem M.
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2006, 17 (06) : 1128 - 1130
  • [32] Does foreign direct investment promote development?
    Griffith, W. H.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2006, 40 (04) : 1174 - 1176
  • [33] Return of migrant workers, educational investment in children and intergenerational mobility in China?
    Junwu, Xu
    Zhaoxiong, Chen
    Junjie, Wu
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2022, 76 : 997 - 1009
  • [34] The effect of intergenerational mobility on family education investment: evidence from China
    Nan Zhao
    Wanqing Liao
    Jun Xia
    Zizhe Zhang
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [35] The effect of intergenerational mobility on family education investment: evidence from China
    Zhao, Nan
    Liao, Wanqing
    Xia, Jun
    Zhang, Zizhe
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [36] Secondary cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: who really benefits?
    Giudice, Maria Teresa
    D'Indinosante, Marco
    Cappuccio, Serena
    Gallotta, Valerio
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Petrillo, Marco
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (05) : 873 - 879
  • [37] Secondary cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: who really benefits?
    Maria Teresa Giudice
    Marco D’Indinosante
    Serena Cappuccio
    Valerio Gallotta
    Anna Fagotti
    Giovanni Scambia
    Marco Petrillo
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 873 - 879
  • [38] Physicians, pharmaceutical representatives, and patients: Who really benefits?
    Westfall, JM
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 49 (09): : 817 - 819
  • [39] Surgical Ventricular Restoration: Who Really Benefits? Reply
    Prucz, Roni
    Weiss, Eric S.
    Conte, John V.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 88 (02): : 709 - 709
  • [40] RAIN-FOREST MARKETING - WHO REALLY BENEFITS
    MEEKERLOWRY, S
    EARTH ISLAND JOURNAL, 1993, 8 (03) : 42 - 43