Dose-position and dose-volume histogram analysis of standard wedged and intensity modulated treatments in breast radiotherapy

被引:47
|
作者
Donovan, EM
Bleackley, NJ
Evans, PM
Reise, SF
Yarnold, JR
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2002年 / 75卷 / 900期
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.75.900.750967
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this work was to evaluate the positional distribution of dose in a concise manner and to analyse dose-histogram results in tangential breast radiotherapy in 300 patients, randomized to standard wedged or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), for future correlation with clinical outcome data. A simple method for analysing the dose-position relationship in the treatment volume was used to compare the spatial distribution of dose in patients. The breast was divided into equal thirds (upper, middle and lower) and dose was assessed using three dose bands; 95-105%, > 105-110% and >110% of the prescription dose. The effect of using IMRT on the dosimetry was assessed from dose-volume histogram data using the following parameters: percentage of the target volume receiving a dose less than 95%, greater than 105%, either less than 95% or greater than 105% of that prescribed; the mean dose; and the maximum dose. Doses greater than 105% were predominantly in the upper and lower regions of the breast in the standard wedged treatment. 96% of these patients received doses greater than 105% in the upper region of the breast and 70% received doses greater than 105% in the lower breast. Only 4% of patients allocated IMRT received doses greater than 105% in either region. Analysis of dose-volume histogram data showed that IMRT reduced the volume receiving a dose greater than 105% by a mean of 10.7% (p=<0.001); the mean change in the volume receiving a dose less than 95% was 0.2% (p=0.63). Average mean plan dose was 101.6% for standard treatment and 99.6% for IMRT (p<0.001 for each compared with 100.0% ideal). The mean value of maximum dose was reduced from 111% to 106% in the group of patients randomized to IMRT. A simple method for describing the relationship between dose and position in the breast, which is helpful for the effective correlation of dosimetry and clinical effects, is reported. Further, application of IMRT to the tangential field irradiation of the breast has been demonstrated to reduce high dose regions in both volume and dose level without compromising either minimum dose coverage or mean dose delivered to the breast.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 973
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dose-volume histogram and dose-surface histogram analysis for skin reactions to carbon ion radiotherapy for bone and soft tissue sarcoma
    Yanagi, Takeshi
    Kamada, Tadashi
    Tsuji, Hiroshi
    Imai, Reiko
    Serizawa, Itsuko
    Tsujii, Hirohiko
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 95 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [22] Dose-volume factors associated with ear disorders following intensity modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Ji-Jin Yao
    Guan-Qun Zhou
    Li Lin
    Wang-Jian Zhang
    Ying-Lin Peng
    Lei Chen
    Ling-Long Tang
    Yan-Ping Mao
    Jun Ma
    Ying Sun
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [23] Dose-volume factors associated with ear disorders following intensity modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Yao, Ji-Jin
    Zhou, Guan-Qun
    Lin, Li
    Zhang, Wang-Jian
    Peng, Ying-Lin
    Chen, Lei
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    Ma, Jun
    Sun, Ying
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [24] Comparison of the dose-mass-histogram (DMH) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) concepts in predicting radiation induced pneumonitis from breast cancer radiotherapy
    Plataniotis, G.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Adamus Gorka, M.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Lind, B. K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S281 - S282
  • [25] A dose-volume histogram analysis of the seminal vesicles in men treated with conformal radiotherapy to 'prostate alone'
    Parker, C
    Haycocks, T
    Bayley, A
    Alasti, H
    Warde, P
    Catton, C
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 14 (04) : 298 - 302
  • [26] Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques and standard wedged tangents for whole breast radiotherapy
    Fong, Andrew
    Bromley, Regina
    Beat, Mardi
    Vien, Din
    Dineley, Jude
    Morgan, Graeme
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [27] Dose-volume histogram evaluation of prone and supine patient position in external beam radiotherapy for cervical and endometrial cancer
    Pinkawa, M
    Gagel, B
    Demirel, C
    Schmachtenberg, A
    Asadpour, B
    Eble, MJ
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (01) : 99 - 105
  • [28] The effect of delineation method and observer variability on bladder dose-volume histograms for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Rosewall, Tara
    Bayley, Andrew J.
    Chung, Peter
    Le, Lisa W.
    Xie, Jason
    Baxi, Siddhartha
    Catton, Charles N.
    Currie, Geoffrey
    Wheat, Janelle
    Milosevic, Michael
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) : 479 - 485
  • [30] LARGE COHORT DOSE-VOLUME RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PAROTID GLAND FUNCTION AFTER RADIOTHERAPY: INTENSITY-MODULATED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY
    Dijkema, Tim
    Terhaard, Chris H. J.
    Roesink, Judith M.
    Braam, Petra M.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Moerland, Marinus A.
    Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04): : 1101 - 1109