A global snapshot of marine biodiversity offsetting policy

被引:19
|
作者
Niner, Holly J. [1 ]
Milligan, Ben [2 ]
Jones, Peter J. S. [3 ]
Styan, Craig A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London, Torrens Bldg 220 Victoria Sq, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] UCL, Ctr Law & Environm, Bentham House, London WC1H0EG, England
[3] UCL, Dept Geog, Pearson Bldg Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
No net loss; Compensation; Marine offsets; Mitigation hierarchy; NO NET LOSS; COMPENSATION; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biodiversity offsetting is used in diverse policy contexts to reduce, halt or reverse losses of biodiversity arising from development or other uses of the natural environment. Despite increasing interest in the concept of biodiversity offsetting, relatively little attention has been devoted to investigating its use in marine environments. This paper presents a systematic review of documents evidencing the application or inclusion of biodiversity offset principles in policy frameworks concerning the marine environment, and in marine development projects. Biodiversity offsetting policies applicable to marine environments were found to exist in six countries (US, Canada, Australia, France, Germany, Colombia) and have been actively considered in at least 27 others. Outside of these, a wide range of other approaches promoting uptake of biodiversity offsetting principles in a marine context were identified. These range from preliminary studies to identify potential compensatory habitat, to nascent biodiversity markets, and project-level application of corporate standards of no net loss. Evidence suggests that where offsetting policy is developed for specific marine application, the preferred approach is to pool financial contributions from developers into funds for strategic action for biodiversity benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 374
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Review of Condition Metrics Used in Biodiversity Offsetting
    Borges-Matos, Clarice
    Maron, Martine
    Metzger, Jean Paul
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 72 (04) : 727 - 740
  • [42] Environmental Policy Instruments for Conserving Global Biodiversity
    Hu, Wuyang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 92 (05) : 1490 - 1491
  • [43] Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting
    Gibbons, Philip
    Macintosh, Andrew
    Constable, Amy Louise
    Hayashi, Kiichiro
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (02) : E643 - E654
  • [44] Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting
    Jacob, Celine
    Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte
    Bas, Adeline
    Calvet, Coralie
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 21 : 92 - 102
  • [45] Sustaining Canadian marine biodiversity: Policy and statutory progress
    Hutchings, Jeffrey A.
    Baum, Julia K.
    Fuller, Susanna D.
    Laughren, Josh
    VanderZwaag, David L.
    FACETS, 2020, 5 : 264 - 288
  • [46] Policy: Marine biodiversity needs more than protection
    Ray Hilborn
    Nature, 2016, 535 : 224 - 226
  • [47] Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: refraning nature to save it
    Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
    Adams, William M.
    ORYX, 2017, 51 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [48] Biodiversity offsetting: problematisation of an emerging governance regime
    Tregidga, Helen
    ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2013, 26 (05): : 806 - 832
  • [49] Global biodiversity patterns of marine forests of brown macroalgae
    Fragkopoulou, Eliza
    Serrao, Ester A.
    De Clerck, Olivier
    Costello, Mark J.
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    Duarte, Carlos M.
    Krause-Jensen, Dorte
    Assis, Jorge
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2022, 31 (04): : 636 - 648
  • [50] Marine biodiversity urgently needs global scale protection
    Arnaud-Haond, Sophie
    OCEANIS, VOL 35, NOS 1 AND 2: TOWARDS A NEW GOVERNANCE OF HIGH SEAS BIODIVERSITY, 2009, 35 (1-2): : 55 - 56