Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting

被引:48
|
作者
Gibbons, Philip [1 ]
Macintosh, Andrew [2 ]
Constable, Amy Louise [2 ]
Hayashi, Kiichiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Nagoya Univ, Civil & Environm Engn Int Programs Off, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
averted loss; avoided loss; biodiversity offsets; deforestation; land clearing; restoration; NO-NET-LOSS; WETLAND MITIGATION; ET-AL; POLICY; CONSERVATION; COVER; TIME; DEFORESTATION; LANDSCAPE; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.13977
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We quantified net changes to the area and quality of native vegetation after the introduction of biodiversity offsetting in New South Wales, Australiaa policy intended to "prevent broad-scale clearing of native vegetation unless it improves or maintains environmental values." Over 10 years, a total of 21,928 ha of native vegetation was approved for clearing under this policy and 83,459 ha was established as biodiversity offsets. We estimated that no net loss in the area of native vegetation under this policy will not occur for 146 years. This is because 82% of the total area offset was obtained by averting losses to existing native vegetation and the rate that these averted losses accrue was over-estimated in the policy. There were predicted net gains in 10 of the 14 attributes used to assess the quality of habitat. An overall net gain in the quality of habitat was assessed under this policy by substituting habitat attributes that are difficult to restore (e.g. mature trees) with habitat attributes for which restoration is relatively easy (e.g. tree seedlings). Long-term rates of annual deforestation did not significantly change across the study area after biodiversity offsetting was introduced. Overall, the policy examined here provides no net loss of biodiversity: (i) many generations into the future, which is not consistent with intergenerational equity; and (ii) by substituting different habitat attributes, so gains are not equivalent to losses. We recommend a number of changes to biodiversity offsetting policy to overcome these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:E643 / E654
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monitoring in biodiversity offsetting
    Moilanen, Atte
    Jalkanen, Joel
    Halme, Panu
    Nieminen, Eini
    Kotiaho, Janne S.
    Kujala, Heini
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2024, 54
  • [2] Ethics and biodiversity offsetting
    Karlsson, Mikael
    Edvardsson Bjornberg, Karin
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (02) : 578 - 586
  • [3] Biodiversity Offsetting in Transnational Governance
    Penca, Jerneja
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2015, 24 (01) : 93 - 102
  • [4] BIODIVERSITY OFFSETTING AND AGRICULTURE: IS THIS COMPATIBLE?
    Roussel, Sebastien
    Tardieu, Lea
    Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2019, 70 (01): : 123 - 137
  • [5] Are we ready for biodiversity offsetting?
    Crous, Casparus J.
    Pryke, James S.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2024, 120 (7-8)
  • [6] A spatial model for biodiversity offsetting
    Brunetti, Ilaria
    Sabatier, Rodolphe
    Mouysset, Lauriane
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2023, 481
  • [7] The politics of influence in biodiversity offsetting
    Barral, Stephanie
    Ghosh, Ritwick
    Corbera, Esteve
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2025,
  • [8] Biodiversity offsetting destroys wildlife
    Wilson, Philip J.
    WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2025, 2025 (02)
  • [9] Calculation of biodiversity level between different land-uses to improve conservation outcomes of biodiversity offsetting
    Millon, Lara
    Barre, Kevin
    Julliard, Romain
    Compere, Pierre
    Kerbiriou, Christian
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 101
  • [10] A global overview of biodiversity offsetting governance
    Droste, Nils
    Olsson, Johanna Alkan
    Hanson, Helena
    Knaggard, Asa
    Lima, Guilherme
    Lundmark, Linda
    Thoni, Terese
    Zelli, Fariborz
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 316